TextSearch

Is Space Fake?

Many people on youtube think space is fake. I want evidence that proves space is fake.

· archived 5/18/2026, 12:38:09 AMcached html
Is Space Fake? - The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com - Debate Anything The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com DebateIsland.com Sign In Register    + New Debate   New Casual Debate   New Formalish Debate   New Lincoln-Douglas Debate   New Traditional Debate   New Persuade Me DebateDebate NewsAbout     MoreDebating Tips TournamentsBest ArgumentsCompetition About Debra AI About Communities About Private Communities About DebateIsland Education FAQMy Drafts LostCry.com frame Howdy, Stranger! It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons! Sign In Register DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website. Communities 7.4K All Communities229 Technology 1.7K Politics 582 United States 483 Global 59 Immigration 1.8K Religion 147 TV SHOWS 52 Movies 65 History 34 Work Place 419 Philosophy 361 Science 61 Earth Science 7 Books 80 Economy 34 Investments 11 Europe 8 Tea 5 Coffee 56 Sports 35 Products 277 News 13 Airplanes 33 Cars 729 General 9 Mafia Games 19 Art And Design 18 Space 47 Military 2 Premium Member ​ DEBATE NEWS  BREAKING NEWSDamar Hamlin's uncle shares update: "His heart went out twice"Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin remains hospitalized after collapsing during Monday night's game against the Cincinnati Bengals. Charlie De Mar spoke with Hamlin's uncle outside the... In this Debate March 2020 JGXdebatePRO February 2020 MisterMan February 2020 [Deleted User] June 2018 LogicVault May 2018 TheShaun May 2018 MayCaesar May 2018 averyapro May 2018 Fredsnephew June 2018 EmeryPearson June 2018 Evidence February 2018 JustIgnoreMe February 2018 Gooberry June 2018 Erfisflat February 2018 billpassed February 2018 joecavalry Home › Space Is Space Fake? Debate Information Many people on youtube think space is fake. I want evidence that proves space is fake.  Live PollIs Space Fake?35 votesYes14.29%No85.71%  0  0  0 Google +0 Reddit0  0  0  New I could either have the future pass me or l could create it.  “We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain .” - Benjamin Franklin  So flat Earthers, man-made climate change deniers, and just science deniers.I friended myself!  «12» Debra AI Prediction Erfisflat Predicted To Win JustIgnoreMe Predicted To Win Tie Details + Total: Erfisflat - TiedArguments: Winning by 2 PtsSources: TiedSpelling & Grammar: Losing by 1 PtsConduct: Losing by 1 Pts LEARN MORE ABOUT DEBRA Post Argument Now Debate Details + By Pogue 584 Pts February 2018 Arguments joecavalry 430 Pts   -  February 2018 Space is not fake. Their are images of space by government organizations such as NASA and possibly private companies. DebateIslander and a DebateIsland.com lover.  Debra AI Analytics      +      Considerate: 88%     Substantial: 42%     Spelling & Grammar: 95%     Sentiment: Neutral     Avg. Grade Level: 10.86     Sources: 0  ____________________   Political Analysis: No Political Affiliation  ____________________   Clear (Beta): 39%     Relevant (Beta): 94%     Learn More About Debra billpassed 146 Pts   -  February 2018 No, space is not fake. Their are images that show space which were taken by many sources. Debra AI Analytics      +      Considerate: 95%     Substantial: 40%     Spelling & Grammar: 94%     Sentiment: Neutral     Avg. Grade Level: 5.34     Sources: 0  ____________________   Political Analysis: No Political Affiliation  ____________________   Clear (Beta): 51%     Relevant (Beta): 93%     Learn More About Debra Erfisflat 1674 Pts   -  February 2018 Evidence against space.Opposing pressure systems.On any practical scale, opposing pressure systems can not exist adjacent to each other. Canned air, light bulbs, the supposed spaceships, submarines, etc are all great examples. Logically, the whole equilibrium excuse sounds good, but without practical evidence, that claim is pseudoscience. A bare assertion. The fact that we are in a positive pressure system at all refutes the idea that we are surrounded by an unfathomably large vacuum, that no one but government sources and friends have witnessed.Stars and moon with high zoom camerasWhat appears to be a clear liquid is seen through high zoom cameras, when zooming into stars. The cameras are fairly inexpensive, and the evidence is gathered from multiple unbiased sources, the videos litter YouTube.3:10Proof of a firmament:RainbowsHere is what science claims.A rainbow is a meteorological phenomenon that is caused by reflection, refraction and dispersion of light in water droplets resulting in a spectrum of light appearing in the sky. It takes the form of a multicoloured circular arc. Rainbows caused by sunlight always appear in the section of sky directly opposite the sun.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RainbowHowstuffworks.com claims that each droplet of water acts as a prism.https://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/climate-weather/atmospheric/question41.htmThey even give us a few diagrams of how they feel the model acts.They, curiously enough, give us only 2 drops, fairly close to each other, implying that each droplet produces it's own rainbow, like the prism, as you can see the red line reaches the eye from a different angle. The purple line dos not reach the eye from the top droplet for, reasons...As if that isn't enough, Wikipedia's entry implies that we should be able to produce the rainbows in our shower!The reality of rainbows is that we need two light sources, or a light source and a reflective surface from which to bounce the same light source from a different angle, with rainwater acting as a lens, or "3d screen" for lack of a better term, where those two rays intersect. For more information, see this short and detailed explanation.Atmospheric Elves.Again we see a similar shape at the 100km. range in atmospheric elves. Is this phenomenon lighting up the dome?https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/finnish_astronomer_snaps_high_altitude_lightning/5972450"Escaping earth's gravity"We all see the shuttle's perform a big parabolic dive in the sky when they go to "space". In theory, and with many assumptions, it is logical and sound, but in reality, I think they hit the dome too many times and found out it was easier just to fish the aircraft out of the sea.The myths and urban legends about this area started up during the space race.A claimed abrupt and extreme rise in temperature ...at, you guessed it, 100km.Operation fishbowl and Admiral ByrdAdmiral Richard Byrd was acclaimed one of the best explorers in history. He explored the north pole early on and moved on towards the south. In the 50's, Byrd was given a small army to go to Antarctica in an operation called "High Jump" to "explore" Antarctica...https://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/operation-highjump-18223476/Operation deep freeze is also discussed in that article, which happened shortly after. Here is Admiral Richard Byrd discussing his adventures in Antarctica:The operation was ended early, and the US Navy came home, apparently defeated, what defeated them is still "classified".Even after the reports of "abundant resources" and "a land as big or bigger than the United States", southern polar exploration ended abruptly. Interestingly named "operation fishbowl" started up shortly thereafter, where the US sent up several warheads, my guess is trying to penetrate the impenetrable firmament.Then, the Antarctic treaty was signed, effectively preventing any civilian from discovering the same thing they did. NASA was formed, using Nazi scientists captees about this time, and the upper limits of our prison was protected from civilian eyes as well. There are more proofs against space and for the firmament, but we'll go over these first.@Pogue and 2 others.Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.Wayne Dyer Debra AI Analytics      +      Considerate: 93%     Substantial: 86%     Spelling & Grammar: 95%     Sentiment: Positive     Avg. Grade Level: 9.66     Sources: 21  ____________________   Political Analysis: No Political Affiliation  ____________________   Clear (Beta): 2%     Relevant (Beta): 6%     Learn More About Debra Erfisflat 1674 Pts   -  February 2018 Erfisflat said: Evidence against space.Opposing pressure systems.On any practical scale, opposing pressure systems can not exist adjacent to each other. Canned air, light bulbs, the supposed spaceships, submarines, etc are all great examples. Logically, the whole equilibrium excuse sounds good, but without practical evidence, that claim is pseudoscience. A bare assertion. The fact that we are in a positive pressure system at all refutes the idea that we are surrounded by an unfathomably large vacuum, that no one but government sources and friends have witnessed.Stars and moon with high zoom camerasWhat appears to be a clear liquid is seen through high zoom cameras, when zooming into stars. The cameras are fairly inexpensive, and the evidence is gathered from multiple unbiased sources, the videos litter YouTube.3:10Proof of a firmament:RainbowsHere is what science claims.A rainbow is a meteorological phenomenon that is caused by reflection, refraction and dispersion of light in water droplets resulting in a spectrum of light appearing in the sky. It takes the form of a multicoloured circular arc. Rainbows caused by sunlight always appear in the section of sky directly opposite the sun.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RainbowHowstuffworks.com claims that each droplet of water acts as a prism.https://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/climate-weather/atmospheric/question41.htmThey even give us a few diagrams of how they feel the model acts.They, curiously enough, give us only 2 drops, fairly close to each other, implying that each droplet produces it's own rainbow, like the prism, as you can see the red line reaches the eye from a different angle. The purple line dos not reach the eye from the top droplet for, reasons...As if that isn't enough, Wikipedia's entry implies that we should be able to produce the rainbows in our shower!The reality of rainbows is that we need two light sources, or a light source and a reflective surface from which to bounce the same light source from a different angle, with rainwater acting as a lens, or "3d screen" for lack of a better term, where those two rays intersect. For more information, see this short and detailed explanation.Atmospheric Elves.Again we see a similar shape at the 100km. range in atmospheric elves. Is this phenomenon lighting up the dome?https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/finnish_astronomer_snaps_high_altitude_lightning/5972450"Escaping earth's gravity"We all see the shuttle's perform a big parabolic dive in the sky when they go to "space". In theory, and with many assumptions, it is logical and sound, but in reality, I think they hit the dome too many times and found out it was easier just to fish the aircraft out of the sea.The myths and urban legends about this area started up during the space race.A claimed abrupt and extreme rise in temperature ...at, you guessed it, 100km.Operation fishbowl and Admiral ByrdAdmiral Richard Byrd was acclaimed one of the best explorers in history. He explored the north pole early on and moved on towards the south. In the 50's, Byrd was given a small army to go to Antarctica in an operation called "High Jump" to "explore" Antarctica...https://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/operation-highjump-18223476/Operation deep freeze is also discussed in that article, which happened shortly after. Here is Admiral Richard Byrd discussing his adventures in Antarctica:The operation was ended early, and the US Navy came home, apparently defeated, what defeated them is still "classified".Even after the reports of "abundant resources" and "a land as big or bigger than the United States", southern polar exploration ended abruptly. Interestingly named "operation fishbowl" started up shortly thereafter, where the US sent up several warheads, my guess is trying to penetrate the impenetrable firmament.Then, the Antarctic treaty was signed, effectively preventing any civilian from discovering the same thing they did. NASA was formed, using Nazi scientists captees about this time, and the upper limits of our prison was protected from civilian eyes as well. There are more proofs against space and for the firmament, but we'll go over these first.@Pogue maybe he can finally respond to these arguments too. Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.Wayne Dyer Debra AI Analytics      +      Considerate: 93%     Substantial: 86%     Spelling & Grammar: 95%     Sentiment: Positive     Avg. Grade Level: 9.8     Sources: 21  ____________________   Political Analysis: No Political Affiliation  ____________________   Clear (Beta): 3%     Relevant (Beta): 6%     Learn More About Debra Gooberry 608 Pts   -  February 2018 Erfisflat said: Erfisflat said: Evidence against space.Opposing pressure systems.On any practical scale, opposing pressure systems can not exist adjacent to each other. Canned air, light bulbs, the supposed spaceships, submarines, etc are all great examples. Logically, the whole equilibrium excuse sounds good, but without practical evidence, that claim is pseudoscience. A bare assertion. The fact that we are in a positive pressure system at all refutes the idea that we are surrounded by an unfathomably large vacuum, that no one but government sources and friends have witnessed.Stars and moon with high zoom camerasWhat appears to be a clear liquid is seen through high zoom cameras, when zooming into stars. The cameras are fairly inexpensive, and the evidence is gathered from multiple unbiased sources, the videos litter YouTube.3:10Proof of a firmament:RainbowsHere is what science claims.A rainbow is a meteorological phenomenon that is caused by reflection, refraction and dispersion of light in water droplets resulting in a spectrum of light appearing in the sky. It takes the form of a multicoloured circular arc. Rainbows caused by sunlight always appear in the section of sky directly opposite the sun.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RainbowHowstuffworks.com claims that each droplet of water acts as a prism.https://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/climate-weather/atmospheric/question41.htmThey even give us a few diagrams of how they feel the model acts.They, curiously enough, give us only 2 drops, fairly close to each other, implying that each droplet produces it's own rainbow, like the prism, as you can see the red line reaches the eye from a different angle. The purple line dos not reach the eye from the top droplet for, reasons...As if that isn't enough, Wikipedia's entry implies that we should be able to produce the rainbows in our shower!The reality of rainbows is that we need two light sources, or a light source and a reflective surface from which to bounce the same light source from a different angle, with rainwater acting as a lens, or "3d screen" for lack of a better term, where those two rays intersect. For more information, see this short and detailed explanation.Atmospheric Elves.Again we see a similar shape at the 100km. range in atmospheric elves. Is this phenomenon lighting up the dome?https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/finnish_astronomer_snaps_high_altitude_lightning/5972450"Escaping earth's gravity"We all see the shuttle's perform a big parabolic dive in the sky when they go to "space". In theory, and with many assumptions, it is logical and sound, but in reality, I think they hit the dome too many times and found out it was easier just to fish the aircraft out of the sea.The myths and urban legends about this area started up during the space race.A claimed abrupt and extreme rise in temperature ...at, you guessed it, 100km.Operation fishbowl and Admiral ByrdAdmiral Richard Byrd was acclaimed one of the best explorers in history. He explored the north pole early on and moved on towards the south. In the 50's, Byrd was given a small army to go to Antarctica in an operation called "High Jump" to "explore" Antarctica...https://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/operation-highjump-18223476/Operation deep freeze is also discussed in that article, which happened shortly after. Here is Admiral Richard Byrd discussing his adventures in Antarctica:The operation was ended early, and the US Navy came home, apparently defeated, what defeated them is still "classified".Even after the reports of "abundant resources" and "a land as big or bigger than the United States", southern polar exploration ended abruptly. Interestingly named "operation fishbowl" started up shortly thereafter, where the US sent up several warheads, my guess is trying to penetrate the impenetrable firmament.Then, the Antarctic treaty was signed, effectively preventing any civilian from discovering the same thing they did. NASA was formed, using Nazi scientists captees about this time, and the upper limits of our prison was protected from civilian eyes as well. There are more proofs against space and for the firmament, but we'll go over these first.@Pogue maybe he can finally respond to these arguments too. “On any practical scale, opposing pressure systems can not exist adjacent to each other.” This is a lie: Earth is replete with high pressure and low pressure systems next to each other in both weather systems, and with decreasing pressure as you get higher. We know, f

… truncated (116,182 more characters in archive)