Operation Northwoods was a plan circulated in the U.S. government in 1962 to stage false flag terrorist attacks inside the U.S. and abroad to provoke “military intervention in Cuba”. The plan called
Operation Northwoods | Public Intelligence Search for: Main menu Skip to content About Contact Contribute Joint Chiefs of Staff Operation Northwoods March 9, 2010 Proposed Top Secret plan from 1962 stating intent among the Joint Chiefs of Staff to stage terrorist attacks, including killing innocent civilians, to provoke war with Cuba Proposals include use of drone aircraft to stage foreign attacks, staging hijackings, staging attacks on U.S. vessels and facilities, staging riots, as well as the creation of “terror campaigns” on U.S. soil Operation Northwoods was a plan circulated in the U.S. government in 1962 to stage false flag terrorist attacks inside the U.S. and abroad to provoke “military intervention in Cuba”. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.” The document was signed by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Lemnitzer and reportedly presented to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962. 1 2 The previously Top Secret document was originally made public on November 18, 1997, by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board, a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy’s assassination.3 “Appendix to Enclosure A” and “Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A” of the Northwoods document were first published online by the National Security Archive on November 6, 1998 in a joint venture with CNN as part of CNN’s 1998 Cold War television documentary series—specifically, as a documentation supplement to “Episode 10: Cuba,” which aired on November 29, 1998. “Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A” is the section of the document which contains the proposals to stage terrorist attacks.4 U.S. Government’s Willingness to Stage Terrorist Attacks In the recommendations section of the “Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)” memo, the Joint Chiefs of Staff make clear their willingness to stage actual terrorist events with legitimate casualties to sustain their intentions to “intervene” militarily in Cuba’s affairs. The cumulative effect of many of the recommendations is stated as being to provoke reactions from the Cuban government which would justify “military intervention”. Many of the suggested actions have a strong component of Psychological Operations (PSYOPS) designed to simultaneously engender domestic U.S. support for “military intervention” while portraying the Cuban government as a rogue, dangerous entity which will internationally serve to justify the U.S. military intervention. The suggested actions include: Use of drone (unmanned) aircraft to simulate air-related catastrophes 8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight. a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone. b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell” the incident.5 Staging “hijacking attempts” of civilian vessels 7. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba.6 Creation of “terror campaigns” inside the U.S. with legitimate victims 4. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.7 Destruction of U.S. military vessels A “Remember the Maine” incident could be arranged in several forms: a. We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to “evacuate” remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.8 Staging fires and mortar attacks on U.S. military bases to cause actual damage to installations and potentially personnel 5. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires. 6. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage). 7. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.9 Using friendly provocateurs to stage riots 4. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans)10 Share this:Source notes: Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuban Invasion in 1962. National Security Archive. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/index.html []Lyman Lemnitzer. Wikipedia.org. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyman_Lemnitzer []Operation Northwoods. Wikipedia.org. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods []Ibid. []Operation Northwoods Documents. Public Intelligence. https://publicintelligence.net/operation-northwoods-documents/ []Ibid. []Ibid. []Ibid. []Ibid. []Ibid. [] Tags:Central Intelligence Agency Cuba Department of Defense False Flag False Flag Terrorism Fidel Castro Joint Chiefs of Staff Top Secret Search for: Follow Us A D V E R T I S E M E N T Categories Documents Afghanistan Africa African Development Bank African Union Botswana Côte d'Ivoire Djibouti Egypt Ethiopia Gabon Guinea Kenya Liberia Libya Mali Mauritania Morocco Mozambique Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan Tanzania Tunisia Uganda Andean Community of Nations Australia Bahrain Bank of International Settlements Belarus Belgium Bermuda Bilderberg Bilderberg Archive Bilderberg Participant Lists Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Burma Cambodia Canada Chile China Colombia Corporate Council of Europe Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Dominican Republic El Salvador European Union European Central Bank Europol Eurosystem Finland France G8 Georgia Germany Greece Guatemala Honduras Hungary India Indonesia International Criminal Police Organization International Monetary Fund Iran Iraq Israel Israel Defense Forces Israel Military Industries Italy Japan Jordan Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Liechtenstein Lithuania Macedonia Malawi Malaysia Mexico Michigan Moldova Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua North Atlantic Treaty Organization North Korea Norway Oman Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Pakistan Palestine Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of Iceland Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scholarly Singapore Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand Threats and Takedown Notices Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Her Majesty's Treasury Home Office United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency International Council of Chemical Associations International Fund for Agricultural Development World Health Organization United States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives Business Executives for National Security California Center for Strategic and International Studies Centers for Disease Control Central Intelligence Agency Foreign Broadcast Information Service Colorado Congressional Budget Office Congressional Research Service Connecticut Delaware Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Department of Commerce Department of Defense Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Intelligence Agency Defense Logistics Agency Defense Security Service Defense Threat Reduction Agency Department of Veterans Affairs Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization Multi-National Corps Iraq National Defense University National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency National Reconnaissance Office National Security Agency North American Aerospace Defense Command Office of Inspector General of the Depratment of Defense U.S. Africa Command U.S. Air Force U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory U.S. Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army War College U.S. Central Command U.S. Coast Guard U.S. Forces Iraq U.S. Forces Japan U.S. Joint Forces Command U.S. Marine Corps U.S. Navy Naval Network Warfare Command Naval Sea Systems Command Office of Naval Intelligence Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command U.S. Northern Command U.S. Pacific Command U.S. Southern Command U.S. Special Operations Command U.S. Strategic Command U.S. Cyber Command United States Military Academy Department of Education Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services Indian Health Service Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection Department of Homeland Security Testimony Immigration and Customs Enforcement Intelligence Fusion Centers Regional Information Sharing Systems Transportation Security Administration U.S. Secret Service Department of Housing and Urban Development Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration Department of State Department of the Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program Department of Transportation Departmnet of the Interior District of Columbia Environmental Protection Agency Federal Aviation Administration Federal Bureau of Investigation Infragard Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Communications Commission Federal Reserve Federal Reserve Bank of New York FEMA Florida Food and Drug Administration General Services Administration Georgia Government Accountability Office Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Guard National Institute of Standards and Technology National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Transportation Safety Board Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority North Carolina North Dakota Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Director of National Intelligence Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency National Counterintelligence Executive National Counterterrorism Center National Intelligence Council Open Source Center Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Pennsylvania Securities and Exchange Commission Tennessee Texas U.S. Agency for International Development U.S. District Court Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia White House National Security Council Wisconsin Wyoming Uruguay Uzbekistan Vatican Venezuela Verizon Vietnam World Bank World Trade Organization News Featured Public Eye Headline Contribute Documents and Information • Contact Us