Near the end of his 2019 autobiography, Bob Lazar writes, “I’m no kind of hero.” With each passing day, that seems less true. I know what you’re thinking: Is this idiot really devoting a column to a controversial UFO whistleblower during a global...
Evidence suggests UFO whistleblower Bob Lazar was telling the truth all along - world owes him an apology -- High Strangeness -- Sott.net Welcome to Sott.net Thu, 05 Jan 2023 The World for People who Think Sections SOTT Focus Best of the Web Puppet Masters Society's Child Secret History Science & Technology Earth Changes Fire in the Sky Health & Wellness Science of the Spirit High Strangeness Don't Panic! Lighten Up! Picture of the Day Quote of the Day Quantum Quirks Archive Topics 9/11 Animals Comets Comets and Catastrophe Series Drought Earthquakes Extreme Temperatures Fireballs Floods JFK Series Plagues Sinkholes Smoking SOTT Radio Network SOTT Summaries Storms Strange Skies Strange Sounds Volcanoes Wildfires Sections SOTT News SOTT Focus SOTT Radio Network Best of the Web Puppet Masters Society's Child Secret History Science & Technology Earth Changes Fire in the Sky Health & Wellness Science of the Spirit High Strangeness Don't Panic! Lighten Up! Topics 9/11 Animals Comets Comets and Catastrophe Series Drought Earthquakes Extreme Temperatures Fireballs Floods JFK Series Plagues Sinkholes Smoking SOTT Radio Network SOTT Summaries Storms Strange Skies Strange Sounds Volcanoes Wildfires Help keep SOTT online! High Strangeness Evidence suggests UFO whistleblower Bob Lazar was telling the truth all along - world owes him an apology Vinay MenonThe StarFri, 24 Jul 2020 17:46 UTC Near the end of his 2019 autobiography, Bob Lazar writes, "I'm no kind of hero." With each passing day, that seems less true. I know what you're thinking: Is this idiot really devoting a column to a controversial UFO whistleblower during a global pandemic? Should I stop reading this tinfoil claptrap right now and spend the next few minutes on something more productive? Answers: 1. Yes. 2. Probably. OK. To everyone still here, why is Bob Lazar on my mind? Because I just read a New York Times story — "No Longer in Shadows, Pentagon's U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public" — that includes a buried nugget about how astrophysicist and Pentagon contractor Eric W. Davis gave a classified briefing to government officials in March about retrieved "off-world vehicles not made on this earth." I know. It's nuts. If you ever watched "The X-Files," the U.S. government has basically done a 180 on UFOs. For nearly a century, intel gathering under clandestine programs — Project Mogul, Project Sign, Project Grudge, Project Blue Book, Project Ozma — had one guiding principle: blanket denial. The stated goal was to investigate UFO sightings. The outcome was official excuses. UFOs were weather balloons or street lamps or migrating birds. They were illusions refracted by the natural world. They were fantasies of deranged imaginations. They were not real. All of that has changed dramatically, starting with a 2017 New York Times blockbuster that revealed the existence of the U.S. government's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, created a decade earlier to analyze unexplained phenomena. The Navy has since publicly verified three videos that show unidentified aircraft violating the laws of aerodynamics. Apparently, there are more. What was once the stuff of supermarket tabloids is now taken seriously by politicians and scientists. So isn't it time Bob Lazar got a second hearing in the court of public opinion? The man put Area 51 on the pop-cultural map in 1989, when during an interview with Las Vegas investigative reporter George Knapp, he made claims that would have sent Fox Mulder to a fainting couch. Lazar said he had worked at a top-secret military base, S-4, near Papoose Lake, where his job was to reverse-engineer crashed alien flying saucers. It was like hearing someone casually say they provided dental care to the Loch Ness Monster. I'm sorry, what? I remember thinking Bob must be smoking crack out of a Bunsen burner. But here's the thing: 30 years later, nothing Lazar said has been disproven. Nothing. Oh, I know the skeptics want to discredit him based on flimsy allegations he falsified his education or previous employment with the Los Alamos National Laboratory. But did he? Knapp visited that lab with Lazar many moons ago and they were granted access without showing credentials. Security recognized Lazar, who gave Knapp a guided tour while waving to former colleagues who waved back. I can tell you right now, if I wander into the Globe and Mail newsroom and start waving at people, I'm going to get tackled and escorted out by security. You can't fake working at a place. So if Lazar really worked at Los Alamos — which officially has no record of him — why should we question his Area 51 claims? There is also no record of Lazar's birth. Does that mean he does not exist? I'd then go several steps further and ask, "Why should we doubt anything Lazar says about UFOs?" In a video authenticated by the Navy this year, a spacecraft is rotating and flying belly-up, exactly as Lazar described in the '80s. It's eerie. When he first talked about Element 115 as a possible power source of antigravitational propulsion, it didn't exist on the periodic table. Now it does. Is that not a strange coincidence? What about his sketches that could now be blueprints for UFOs? As far as I can tell, Bob Lazar has been vindicated at every turn. And you know what? The world owes him an apology. But if you google Lazar, you get sucked into a black hole that suggests he is a "fraud," "liar," "conspiracy theorist" and "UFO hoaxster." What he was saying in 1989 — we have recovered crashed alien saucers that defy everything we know about the universe — was a stick of dynamite to rational thought. But what he was saying then is now backed up by the official record. Please read Lazar's autobiography "Dreamland," or watch the Netflix doc "Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers," and tell me why you still think he is a deceptive kook. Spoiler alert: You can't do it. Lazar has never once tried to profit from the whistle-blowing that ruined his career. He's not on any lucrative speaking circuits. He's not selling kitschy T-shirts of Little Green Men. He goes about his business in the shadow of infamy and ridicule. Thirty years later, he just wants to move on and change the subject. He wants breathing room amid the suffocation of terrestrial doubt. But if, as reported this week, more UFO revelations are forthcoming — and they involve new insights on retrieved meta-materials not of this world — isn't it time to set the record straight on our most famous UFO whistleblower? Isn't it time we landed this flying saucer on consensus? Bob Lazar is either a diabolical liar or some kind of hero. He can't be both. But what he could be, now more than ever, is an invaluable tour guide into the unknown. Vinay Menon is the Star's pop culture columnist based in Toronto. Follow him on Twitter: @vinaymenon See Also: Internet abuzz after mysterious red lights spotted in Atlantic ocean Government report claims 'cosmic' and 'phantom' UFOs are all over Ukraine's skies New documentary reveals people claim they saw aliens after UFO crash-landed in Brazil in 1996 Login — Register to add your comments! Reader Comments (50) scrutinizer · 2 years ago 1. There is no "global pandemic" ... there are no deaths as a direct result of a coronavirus infection and there never will be, PERIOD. I'm a microbiologist not just a guy repeating something. There is however, a huge destruction of society, culture, education, and economy in prep for mass starvation possibly due to the current GSM. 2. Lazar probably recently wrote a book and this piece is to boost sales a bit, but I actually believed him somewhat as I saw an old video showing his name actually was in an area 51 directory/personnel list and subsequently removed. Joyly · 2 years ago We are arrogant enough to think we know everything about the universe, that we are the only living species, that other life supporting planets do not exist. Here is a man prepared to blow up his own career to inform the public of what the powers don’t want us to know. If what he says is true then either we do not understand fully the laws of aerodynamics or there is another modality of Laws that can override aerodynamics, in the same way aerodynamics overrides the laws of gravity. Either way isn’t it worth investigating? Apparently the AATIP think it is; and if so why do they want to keep it secret? Also worth investigating. Arrogantly believing ‘we know’ stops us from seeking truth. Why would we do that? Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago Rich Planet TV: Statement analysis carried out by Peter Hyatt on Bob Lazar (18:03)....[Link] baron · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute Yea Richard Hall is a good guy, I sent him some information, but understanding the technical side is not easy because it involves another physics, and so that aspect is beyond him and most others. It's not that Lazar ever lied, it's that his preconceived ideas which were implanted into his mind via conventinal physics allowed his controllers to make up lies, and which he and many others believe and have continued to believe, and specifically in regards to this rediculious claim of there being an stable isotope of element 115 which has these magical antigravity properties. BTW...thanks for the edit function Sott.net Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago baron It's not that Lazar ever lied Did you watch Hyatt's statement analysis on X2 speed? baron · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute No, not yet, just sending you a note is all. So youre saying watch it. baron · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute Well I should know better considering it's Richard Hall. He's a good investigator. Does still fit with my belief that Lazar was a mind control vicitim, but I see what you're saying. Will have to watch the whole thing. It's been a while since I checked in on Richard. Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago baron Hall's hypothesis towards the end, that Lazar may have been used by Naval Intelligence as a disinfo artist, seems a bit iffy to me. Surely, if they'd wanted to do that they would have either picked a better liar, or put Lazar through a crash course in 'how to fib'. LOL. Coffee Talk · 2 years ago baron Where exactly is this editing function? I don't see it anywhere around my comments. Is it only available to longtime members? You get it after 2000 comments? Coffee Talk · 2 years ago baron Oh nevermind, i see it now. baron · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute I've never spent a lot of time studying the details of the Lazar story mainly because it, along with that of the late Edgar Fouche were perposterous technically speaking, as are the insane propositons of another self proclaimed expert known as "alien scientist." Whom I know Rich has talked about in the same light as an enemy agent of human advancement in this area. I have extensively studied this topic, both historically and technically speaking. Gravity control and manipulation begins with the Vril Saucer designs, a design which almost assuredly came from the leading Greman Scientists among whom included Physicist Otto Schumann. Gravity control is closely associated with efforts to create cloaking devices by way of the theory of operation. The Vril design uses a novel and imaginative method to manipulate how matter obtains weight in mass. It's truly brilliant in conception. However, to understand how UFO's work requries an understanding of unofficially approved science. UFO's do not use the physics which are taught today in colleges and universities. They use the physics of Tesla's time, the man whom called Einstein a fuzzy haired crackpot. Tesla further alluded to the possibility that Einstein was insane. A theory I quite agree with. Suffice to say this; right now gravity control is being demonstrated by a flying scrap heap, the Vril design has been successfully reverse engineered, and shortly Bob Lazar will be shown a fool or worse, along with just about every other pesudo scientific expert teaching physics today under the Einsteinian umbrella. You will probably live to see real antigravity in the near future. Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago baron I have no major reason to doubt the possibility of back-engineered flying disks or whatever, and what I think of Bob Lazar is irrelevant to that. It seems to me Bob Lazar is either: a useless liar, someone with very poor communication skills, someone with alzheimer's etc-you-name-it. What Bob Lazar is not, is a reliable witness. Joyly · 2 years ago baron Thankyou. I love it. This is one area where we are stuck because we think we know and that stops further investigation. baron · 2 years ago Joyly You want to follow Ken Wheeler, author of; "Uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism." Just search yucktube using the title to find Ken's video's. He's the bald headed young man with the tatoo's. The book is a field theory on magnetism, but it's much more than that, and it will be necessary to understand this theory in the near future. Also search the title to find the 3rd Ed for free online. Bellheezy · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute That statement analysis is pretty weak. People get nervous during interviews and words don't come out as polished as they should. Have you ever thought to yourself, "man l can't believe l said that?" I don't have any problems believing Bob Lazar. He has no motive and everything has checked out. Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago Bellheezy Gravity waves, interdimensional Zeta-Reticulans, back-engineered alien anal probes, Nazi Haunebu flying disk technology, all of the above may or may not be true, but if anyone thinks Bob Lazar is a reliable pointer to any of that, I've got a nice white montmorillonite mine just outside of Area 51 I'd like to sell them....[Link] Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute Off-topic, I know, but speaking of which, this is interesting.... Montmorillonite-catalysed formation of RNA oligomers: the possible role of catalysis in the origins of life....[Link] Joyly · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute Interesting link: interesting that scientists investigating the origin of life are discovering the hierarchical building blocks that make up the human physical body, but the life force is not there. Then there is the spirit body which is similarly made up of hierarchical constructs, but the life force is not there either. The life force is provided by God in the human soul which connects to and provides life force to the spirit body which connects to the physical body giving life force. It is when this connection breaks that ‘death’ occurs to the physical body. Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago Joyly Puts a new spin on Adam & Eve yarns. I guess there's no real reason why all aspects of so-called abiogenesis theories and so-called intelligent design theories should be mutually incompatible. Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago Joyly Interestingly enough, NASA seem quite excited that, at least according to them, both montmorillonite and borax have been discovered on Mars. Researchers in December 2016 announced the discovery by the Curiosity rover of the element boron in mineral veins on the planet Mars. No other mission to Mars has found boron. However, boron was found in Martian meteorites that included MIZ 09030 in 2013, MIL 09030, Nakhla, Lafayette, and Chassigny. For boron to be present in the veins there must have been a temperature between 0-60 degrees Celsius and a neutral-to-alkaline pH. The temperature, pH, and dissolved minerals of the groundwater support a habitable environment. Moreover, boron has been suggested to be necessary for life to form. Its presence stabilizes the sugar ribose which is an ingredient in RNA. Ribose would rapidly decompose in water without boron being present. On Earth, boron compounds may have been needed to link the organic compounds that were produced without life into RNA-like molecules that were used for the very first life forms. One popular hypothesis for the origin of life suggests that the nucleic acid, RNA, performed two important roles: RNA stored genetic information and also catalyzed the chemical reactions that helped get life started. A hurdle in this route to life is that we don’t know how the first RNA molecules themselves were formed. A new study supported by the NASA Astrobiology Institute and led James Ferris of the New York Center for Astrobiology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute may further our understanding of the ‘RNA world’ hypothesis.RNA molecules are built from smaller pieces ( a.k.a. monomers). When pieced together to form RNA, these monomers must be ‘activated’ – in other words, they need to be switched ‘on’ and chemically ready to react with other molecules. This produces a strand of RNA that could be useful in the RNA world scenario.A new study is shedding light on this step in the process. The research focuses on montmorillonite – a group of soft minerals that are usually found in the form of clay and occur naturally on Earth. Previous work has shown that activated nucleic acids can be formed when montmorillonite minerals are present to catalyze the reaction. However, not all montmorillonites are catalytic – and the new research is helping us understand why. The extent of catalysis depends on the magnitude of the negative charge between layers of montmorillonite minerals, the number of negatively charged ions that produce this charge, and also the pH at which the reaction occurs.The study also reveals new characteristics of the RNA molecules formed by montmorillonite catalysis, and is beginning to unravel the mechanism by which montmorillonite helps RNA form.Scientists are not sure if montmorillonite or nucleic acids were present on the early Earth, but it is possible. Additionally, the recent discovery of montmorillonite on Mars raises questions about whether or not a similar process could have occurred on the red planet.The study, “The role of montmorillonite in its catalysis of RNA synthesis,” was published in the journal Applied Clay Science under lead author Michael F. Aldersley and coauthors Prakash Joshi, Jonathan Price and James Ferris. The research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the NASA Astrobiology Institute. What may also be interesting is that montmorillonite and borax are both used in vaccines. Joan · 2 years ago Maybe it would be a good idea to check out the archival footage from George Knapp, regarding the UFO phenomena. It is interesting. Look at old videos regarding Bob Lazar and his disclosures regarding UFO workings of alien craft, then the recent disclosures regarding the pentagon videos. The gimble video to my mind offers some insight into what Bob Lazar was saying decades ago [Link] Wikki pentagon videos, really it's the best I have seen so far without outlandish comments. Also for those inclined, the Lazar interview on Joe Rogan, and the recent interview with George Knapp, also the now retired Commander of the force that captured the footage. The archival footage of of George Knapp's website, lot's of interesting information [Link] Mystery Wire. Then come back and discuss the topic. But there is the phrase at the back of my mind. Why now? This has been documented throughout the centuries, for those that are aware of strange and unusual phenomena and sightings in our skies. Joyly · 2 years ago Joan Why now? only thing that comes to mind is to play with people’s fears of aliens (which has been created with the help of Hollywood) to support big budgets coming up for space weaponisation. Highland Fleet Lute · 2 years ago Joyly People should be afraid of aliens....[Link] Martin Harris · Joyly Bingo. · 2 years ago Joyly · 2 years ago Highland Fleet Lute Thanks for the link. Interesting. My take is a little different - still considering. Nathan Carney · 2 years ago Joyly Given that many sightings have a hallucinating component; there are a lot of strange things that will occur as we move into 4d… truncated (23,266 more characters in archive)