Is Tesla Motors Really a Techn - GuruFocus.com
GuruFocus Article or News written by Soid Ahmad and the topic is about: It has no presence among top patent holders across automotive assembly
· archived 5/18/2026, 12:36:20 AMscreenshotcached html Is Tesla Motors Really a Techn - GuruFocus.com 🚀 New Year Membership Promotion (Save up to 30%) ! ✨ Sign Up Login Home Homepage Membership Levels About Us General Discussion Complete Stock List The book Membership Data Coverage Founder's Message Free Trial Screeners GuruFocus Screeners All-In-One Screener Ben Graham Lost Formula Canadian Faster Growers CEO Buys CEO Buys after Price Drop > 20% Dividend Aristocrats 2022 Dividend Growth Portfolio Dividend Income Portfolio Fast Growers Good Companies Hedge Fund Guru Top 10 Aggregated High Quality High Quality Low Capex w ROE ROC min High Quality & Low Capex High Yield Insider Buys Historical High Dividend Yields International Gurus' Top Holdings James Montier Short Screen 3 New Margin Decliners 8 New Mega Caps Peter Lynch & Warren Buffett 7 New Peter Lynch Growth w Lower Valuation 1 New Peter Lynch S&L Traded Below Book PFCF Screener 17 New Piotroski Score Screener 9 New Predictable Growth Companies 2 New Profitable predictable margin expanders Stocks Sold w less Cash The Stalwarts My Screeners Create My Screener Value Screens Stock Ideas All-In-One Screener S&P 500 Map S&P 500 Bubble S&P 500 Aggregate Buffett-Munger Screener Industry Overview Undervalued Predictable Benjamin Graham Net-Net 52-week/3Y/5Y Lows 9 New 52-week/3Y/5Y Highs 9 New Magic Formula(Greenblatt) 20 New Dividend Stocks Peter Lynch Screen S&P500 Grid 20 New Predictable Companies 7 New Spin Off List Historical Low P/B List 3 New Historical Low P/S List 3 New High Short Interest Upcoming Special Dividends 20 New Delisted Stocks Model Portfolios Performances Overview Most Broadly Held Portfolio Most Weighted Portfolio Buffett-Munger Top 25 GF Score <= 100 Top 25 Top 25 Undervalued Predictable Top 25 52-week Low Predictable Top 25 Historical Low P/S Stock Comparison Airline Stocks Artificial Intelligence Stocks Bank Stocks Biotech Stocks Blockchain Stocks Chinese Stocks Dividend Stocks EV Stocks Growth Stocks Oil Stocks Value Stocks Virtual Reality Stocks Compare More Stocks… Gurus Guru Trades Latest Guru Picks Real Time Picks Guru Portfolio Top 10 Holdings View Guru Bargains Hot Picks Aggregated Portfolio Consensus Picks ETFs Score Board Sector Picks International Picks Industry Trends Geographic Trend Options European Shorting Guru Lists Complete Guru List Warren Buffett 3 New Bill Gates 2 New Mohnish Pabrai 1 New Carl Icahn 2 New George Soros 28 New David Tepper Seth Klarman 2 New Bill Ackman Joel Greenblatt 196 New Charlie Munger Michael Price Julian Robertson Chuck Akre David Einhorn Tom Gayner My Guru Lists Insiders Insider Trading Tracker Real-Time Insider Picks CEO Buys/Sells CFO Buys/Sells Insider Trends Insider Cluster Guru + Insider Double Buys Triple Buys/Sells Chinese Insider Complete Insider List Market US Market Valuation Buffett Indicator U.S. Treasury Yield Curve Shiller P/E Shiller P/E by Sectors GF Value for S&P 500 Index Buffett Assets Allocation Global Market Valuation Global Market Overview USA China Japan India Canada UK France Germany Brazil Australia More... Economic Indicators Economic Indicators Overview The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) SP 500 Index Nasdaq Composite Index Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Shiller PE Ratio of Wilshire 5000 over GNP Civilian Unemployment Rate Russell 2000 Small Cap Price Index CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) Total Nonfarm Payrolls: All Employees More... Sector & Industry Performance Global Industry Overview USA Asia Europe Canada UK/Ireland Oceania Latin America Africa India/Pakistan Articles Articles Editors' Picks Q&A with Gurus Top Ranked News Value Idea Contest Submit Articles Submit Article Online Writers Wanted Tools Model Portfolios All-In-One Screener Data Batch Download Guru Portfolio Download Insider Data Download Excel Add-In Google Sheets Add-On API Manual of Stocks DCF Calculator Interactive Chart Maps Fund Letters Archive Stock Comparison Table Mobile App Discussion Board ETF Pricing Tutorials Tutorials Financial Glossary FAQ Change Log Contact Us Support Chat Support Create a ticket Schedule a Meeting User Engagement Meeting 469-248-6885 Status Subscribe Free Trial Refer a Friend and Earn $50 Login Feedback 7-Day Free Trial Is Tesla Motors Really a Technology Company? It has no presence among top patent holders across automotive assembly Soid Ahmad Follow May 15, 2017 BookmarkCancel Confirm Tesla Motors (TSLA) is a technology company holding specific technology that other companies need in order to compete in the automotive space. Tesla is the Apple (AAPL) of the automotive industry. These are the kinds of things you hear from Tesla bulls on a regular basis. The problem is that Tesla is neither a technology company nor does it differentiate like Apple. Let’s address both of these myths. Exclusivity like Apple? Tesla is touted to be the Apple of the automotive industry. The problem is that Apple differentiates in design and has exclusive software and homegrown IC designs. Tesla, on the other hand, doesn’t hold such perks. The company has to compete in a market flooded with competitors and component providers. For instance, car platforms are a key differentiator if one wants to compete on quality. There are several providers for car platform products across industries. This is a snapshot of software platform partners of QNX software systems. There are service providers in every area of car platforms and infotainment ranging from vehicle-bus to system integrators. The point is that Tesla might not be able to differentiate as it doesn’t have exclusivity in this area. Battery technology isn’t the only thing that matters for the production of a competitive electric vehicle. Management of those batteries through software and embedded systems can create a whole lot of difference. That’s why car platforms are important. Tesla’s capabilities are easily replicable Having such a wide base of suppliers in every area of automotive, it won’t be a problem for other car manufacturers to match Tesla in terms of technology and in-car experience. It’s just a matter of outsourcing the right suppliers – not to mention the deep pockets of General Motors (GM) and Ford Motors (F) to actually do that. Big automotive can replicate what Tesla has been doing. There is no closed source iOS to make Tesla competitive. Apple’s success, in part, was derived from its closed source strategy, which made the phone more efficient. Anyhow, Tesla’s capabilities are easily replicable. Let’s now take a look at how much of a technology company Tesla actually is Electric powertrain? Source: lens.org, electric powertrain Ford Motor, General Motors and Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE: TM) are among the top owners of patents for electric powertrain. Tesla is nowhere to be seen in the top 10 patent holders. General Motors and Ford Motors also hold some of the key patents in electric vehicle powertrain. When searched for electric vehicle patents, neither does Tesla show up among the top 10 patent holders, nor does the company holds key patents, according to patent database lens.org. Source: lens.org, electric vehicles Interestingly, Tesla doesn’t even show up in a patent search for “battery electric vehicles.” Ford and General Motors hold the top two spots. To make things worse, LG Chem Ltd. (XKRX:051910) appears in the top 10 patent holders for battery electric vehicles. Note that LG Chem is eying the battery market and competing against the likes of Panasonic Corp. (TSE:6752) and Tesla Motors. Source: lens.org, battery electric vehicle Furthermore, Tesla uses a three-phase AC induction motor in its Model S60 as compared to permanent magnet AC synchronous electric used by Chevrolet Bolt. While three-phase motors are cheap and maintenance free, permanent magnet motors are better in terms of overall efficiency. Overall, it’s a trade-off, and Tesla doesn’t beat the competition at all ends. Advance driving assistance? Source: lens.org, driving assistance Regarding advanced driving assistance systems, or ADAS, Toyota holds the most patents for driving assistance followed by Denso Corp. (TSE:6902) and Nissan Motor (TSE:7201). General Motors, Delphi Technologies and Ford Motors are in the spotlight for automotive electronics. Note that key players in advanced driving systems, or ADAS, include Delphi, Bosch, Continental, Denso, Mobileye (MBLY) and QNX, etc. The point being, Tesla doesn’t hold a competitive advantage in advanced driving assistance that can justify its design leadership or the share price. See the patent distribution in automotive electronics below: Source: lens.org, automotive electronics Let’s move to batteries. When searched for lithium ion batteries, Toyota showed up on the top. It’s worth mentioning that LG Chem holds around 2,040 patents as compared to 1,051 patents held by Panasonic Corp. Given Tesla’s Gigafactory partnership with Panasonic, the company is lagging in terms of patents as compared to LG Chem. What’s more interesting is that automotive related battery patents are being led by GM Global technologies; Tesla isn’t in the top 10. See the chart below: Source: lens.org, automotive battery No earnings in sight Reuters reported that Tesla might be facing renegotiations from certain suppliers leading to incremental costs.“Tesla – experienced cost increases from certain suppliers in order to meet quality targets, development timelines and due to design changes. Tesla – certain suppliers, including for model X, have sought to renegotiate the terms of the supply arrangements.”Reuters further notes that the company is redesigning some components in order to reduce costs. Being on a deadline for Model 3, this doesn’t look good from a production perspective. Final thoughts Overall, let’s stop comparing Tesla to Apple as it doesn’t have exclusive differentiation. The IP portfolio isn’t impressive to warrant the current stock price. And, no, Tesla can’t replicate Qualcomm’s (QCOM) success licensing its IP because clearly, across the assembly, the company doesn’t show up in top patent holders, and there’s no evidence of Tesla licensing its IP to other providers as of now. Tesla is grossly overvalued and a quite risky proposition for the portfolio. Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. Start a free seven-day trial of Premium Membership to GuruFocus. Rating: 0 / 5 (0 votes) BookmarkCancel Confirm Please Login to Comment WRITTEN BY Follow Soid Ahmad Visit Soid Ahmad's Website Request A Demo Learn more about GuruFocus' key features, including All-In-One Screener, backtesting, 30-year financial, stock summary page, guru trades, insider trades, excel Add-in, google sheets and much more. Request A Demo GuruFocus Screeners Related Articles Research Tools All-In-One Screener Stock Ideas Stock List Guru List Guru Real-Time Picks Insider List Insider Trades Economic Indicators Sector & Industry Performance DCF Calculator Discussion Board Product Pricing Plans Excel Add-In Google Sheets Add-on Data API Stock Comparison Table Manual of Stocks Mobile App 中文 Education Financial Glossary Tutorials FAQ Schedule Free Session Buffett Indicator Shiller P/E Yield Curve Today Global Market Valuation Buffett Assets Allocation Company About GuruFocus Career Contact Us ETF ADV Part 2A ADV Part 2B ADV Part 3 Advertise Site Map Term of Use Privacy Policy Referral Program Affiliate Program Follow Us Disclaimers GuruFocus.com is not operated by a broker or a dealer. It has an affiliated registered investment adviser, which serves as the subadviser to an exchange traded fund. This investment adviser does not provide advice to individual investors. Under no circumstances does any information posted on GuruFocus.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute investment advice or recommendations. The individuals or entities selected as "gurus" may buy and sell securities before and after any particular article and report and information herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article and report posted herein. Gurus may be added or dropped from the GuruFocus site at any time. In no event shall GuruFocus.com be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on GuruFocus.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, GuruFocus.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. The gurus listed in this website are not affiliated with GuruFocus.com, LLC. Stock quotes provided by InterActive Data. Fundamental company data provided by Morningstar, updated daily. © 2004-2023 GuruFocus.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved.