The mainstream media would like us to believe that Adrenochrome would have little effect on an individual and therefore there is no reason to suspect that it is used by “elites”. Howeve…
The Truth About Adrenochrome. – The Expose The Expose Home Friday, January 12th, 2024|Twitter Telegram Youtube Gab GETTR Search for... Menu Home Did You Know? Opinion Pages The Expose Blog World News Keep up with The Exposé Contact us About us We Need Your Support How bad is my Covid-19 Vaccine batch? Search for... TranslatePowered by Translate Support The Exposé The Exposé relies solely on your support to allow us to report the facts the mainstream refuse to. If you like what we do then please help us to keep doing it with a one-time or monthly donation today... Follow Us Twitter Telegram Recent Posts Gaza War Expands As US, UK Warplanes Bomb Houthi Strongholds In Yemen. Yale professor says prion diseases are on the rise but no one is discussing the condition – Who’s no one? Canadian government lobbies WHO to include climate change in the definition of a pandemic emergency Today at the Hague – South Africa Lists the Genocidal Acts Committed By Israeli Forces in Gaza. The Exposé’s January Fundraising Campaign – The Establishment is trying to shut us down & we rely solely on YOUR support… The Expose Blog The Truth About Adrenochrome. By Patricia Harrity on December 13, 2023 • ( 18 Comments ) The mainstream media would like us to believe that Adrenochrome would have little effect on an individual and therefore there is no reason to suspect that it is used by “elites”. However, Adrenochrome is a potent drug that has diverse effects on the body and mind and can even cause sudden death. There is a recognised association between rising to the top in many professions and psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies and while some individuals may naturally possess these traits, others might turn to chemical assistance, such as adrenochrome, to achieve similar effects, according to biomedical scientist, Simon Lee, who claims that, Adrenochrome can enable these individuals to feel disinterested and superior and where causing others to suffer may ordinarily disturb them the drug helps them to navigate without emotional disturbance, maintaining a belief in their mental clarity. The Truth About Adrenochrome By Simon Lee, Science Officer, Anew UK “One of the most ludicrous arguments proffered by the mainstream media, meant to “debunk” the adrenochrome allegations, is that “adrenochrome is a relatively mundane chemical compound created by oxidizing adrenaline.” Therefore, mainstream media reporters argue, there is no reason for suspected “élite” adrenochrome junkies to drink child blood.” Iain Davis The Deplorables Start to Gossip so the Propagandists and Censors Get to Work. Google Trends showed significant spikes in searches for “adrenochrome” in March and June of 2020 and public interest has increased since then. Adrenochrome groups are now prevalent on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Reddit, and other social media sites. This has led to frantic attempts, by the globalist propagandists and censors, to regain control of the narrative. According to the propaganda, we returned to the dark ages in 2020 because we were “beset with plague, rampant medical misinformation, and a persistent rumour that “global elites” torture children to harvest the chemical adrenochrome from their blood, which they then inject in order to stay healthy and young”. So, just to be clear, there was no “plague” it was a pseudopandemic psy-op, and it should now be clear to informed people that the “rampant medical misinformation” was coming from the medical authorities themselves not those of us questioning the official pandemic narrative. With this in mind, why would anyone believe what these same propagandists say about adrenochrome? According to the propagandists, adrenochrome harvesting “isn’t outwardly blamed on Jews” but nevertheless is still “anti-Semitic” and anybody discussing this subject is of course therefore “far right”. As we are all now well aware, these unfounded smears are routinely deployed against anyone questioning the official globalist narrative on any topic. Even Jewish people are now “anti-Semitic” if they go off script. Regarding adrenochrome, it is claimed that “little scientific research has been done beyond a few studies in the mid-20th century on whether it could play a role in schizophrenia” and that “biologists didn’t find much of interest”. Since adrenochrome “isn’t that important” allegedly it “doesn’t get written about much by scientists, journalists, or academics”. In reality, a search of the PubMed database ( comprising more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books ) returns 773 results for adrenochrome at the time of writing. Only 57 of these were published up to and including the year 1950. Despite this, the propagandists describe adrenochrome as an “imaginary drug”. According to the propagandists, it is really bad for ideas to go “undetected and undebunked” by online platforms and the mainstream media because this has “enabled the rapid growth of antivax communities, Covid-19 disinformation, and the prevalence of the adrenochrome harvesting theory”. They insist that in the absence of “trustworthy information” from “authoritative sources” a “data void” is created, allowing the spread of “misinformation and conspiracism” by the deplorables. What the stupid, uneducated peasants need instead is “well-curated, timely, and relevant” content in order to “halt the progress of conspiracists operating largely unchecked in ideological echo chambers”. What is apparently required is “active promotion of authoritative content” so as to “inoculate against the disinformation”. Tech companies should team up with “experts” to “get ahead of these trends with timely relevant information”. Since the deplorable peasants (like me) are barely literate, it seems reasonable to ask “Would a peer-reviewed study on andrenochrome’s inability to reanimate aging global elites even impact the communities that spread these complex falsehoods?”. The predictably patronising sneering answer offered is “Probably not”. According to a peer-reviewed study: “The fact that adrenochrome and adrenolutin have produced changes in the perception, thinking, and feeling of humans makes them very interesting for psychiatrists and physiological psychologists, although some deny that adrenochrome is active in humans. If it were true that adrenochrome is indeed inactive in humans, we would then have the curious situation of a chemical which is active in many species of animals, including the monkey, being inactive in man.” Dr A. Hoffer According to the narrative, if the tech companies don’t eradicate “hate speech”, “medical misinformation”, and the “bigotry laundered through modern conspiracy” then they “may accelerate the arrival of a new dark age”. Gulp. Nobody wants that. This is the uncensored truth about adrenochrome… Chemistry and Physiological Effects of Adrenochrome Contrary to the propaganda, adrenochrome is not a drug “drummed up by a semi-fictional memoir” it is a real drug that has been the subject of a significant amount of peer reviewed scientific research. Propagandist Jennifer Walker-Journey claims to be “Untangling the Conspiracy Theories Around Adrenochrome” in HowStuffWorks with lies such as this: “In truth, adrenochrome is a rather innocuous chemical compound produced by the oxidation of the body’s stress hormone adrenaline, also called epinephrine.” In actual truth, a wide range of physiological activity has been ascribed to adrenochrome and closely related substances. Many claims and counterclaims have been made, thereby stimulating interest in its physical and chemical properties. This has resulted in a “considerable volume of literature on the physiological and pharmacological properties of adrenochrome and related compounds.” according to Dr A. Hoffer. A red oxidation product of adrenaline was isolated in crystalline form from the products of an enzymatic oxidation and identified by Green and Richter in 1937, who proposed the name “adrenochrome”. When these crystals are crushed, the resulting powder is bright red in colour. Although pure adrenochrome is relatively stable in the solid state, its aqueous solutions, decompose rapidly with the formation of black precipitates of melanin. Adrenochrome is a chemically very reactive substance, and it reacts with a wide variety of bodily constituents. It clearly interferes with sensory perception suggesting that the brain is the main target. Research interest in adrenochrome has been shown in the fields of neurology, cardiology, and psychiatry. The research in cardiology shows that adrenalin is very readily oxidized into adrenochrome which is toxic to myocardial tissue and may be responsible for fibrillation and sudden death under stress. Myocardial tissue is very high in the enzyme which oxidises adrenalin to adrenochrome. Cocaine blocks two of the enzyme systems the body normally uses to destroy adrenalin, thereby forcing more of it into the adrenochrome pathway. This could be the explanation for sudden death sometimes associated with cocaine abuse. Adrenochrome interferes with the growth and function of intact cells. It inhibits respiratory reactions, glycolysis, and cell division (mitosis). Adrenochrome inhibits decarboxylation of the neurotransmitter glutamic acid in brain tissue, oxidises simple amino acids, is an antagonist of the neurotransmitter serotonin, can inhibit synaptic transmission, and it is polymerised to brownish melanin pigments in brain, intestinal mucosa, and skin. When adrenochrome is added to living neurons: “The normal neurons pulsated slowly and rhythmically. When a small quantity of adrenochrome was added to the culture the cells began to pulsate more quickly and vigorously. Each cell appeared to develop contortions or convulsions in slow motion. After some time, the neurons rounded up in a spherical structure. Then the membrane must have ruptured for the cell disappeared leaving a spherical ring of dark fragments and pigmented material. LSD and serotonin also influenced pulsatile behaviour but did not kill the cells (Geiger, 1960). Schizophrenic serum was also toxic.” Dr A. Hoffer Vitamin B3, niacin or niacinamide, protects brain tissue against some of the toxic effects of adrenochrome such as EEG changes and schizophrenic-like symptoms. However, the effects of adrenochrome are not always toxic or inhibitory. Derouaux and Roskam (1949) found that sympathetic nerves in the rabbit’s ear did not fatigue as rapidly in the presence of adrenochrome. The Adrenochrome Hypothesis of Schizophrenia “The adrenochrome hypothesis accounts for the syndrome of schizophrenia more accurately than do any of the competing hypotheses.” Dr A Hoffer Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, perceives reality, and relates to others. It can be chronic and disabling. Symptoms of schizophrenia can include delusions, hallucinations, disorganised speech, trouble with thinking, and lack of motivation. People with schizophrenia may seem like they have lost touch with reality, which can be distressing for them and their family and friends. An alternative interpretation, is that people labelled with schizophrenia, are actually more in touch with reality than the average person, which can also be distressing for all concerned. The adrenochrome hypothesis of schizophrenia was first proposed in published form by Dr A. Hoffer, Dr H. Osmond and Dr Smythies in 1954. They hypothesised that adrenochrome acts as an endogenous schizophrenogen and plays a causative role in the disease. Strangely, they “first publicly discussed” their “adrenochrome hypothesis in 1952 before the Dementia Praecox Committee of the Scottish Rites Masons in New York.” before belatedly publishing it in an academic journal two years later. The original adrenochrome hypothesis proposed that schizophrenia arose when too much adrenochrome was formed, that adrenochrome then interfered with brain function, and that created the conditions needed for the development of schizophrenia. They collaborated with Dr. R. Heacock to conduct a large series of clinical studies to determine if adrenochrome and the related adrenalin derivative andrenolutin are hallucinogens. The researchers sought answers to the following questions: (1) was adrenochrome made in the body, where, how much, by which enzymes? (2) was adrenochrome an hallucinogen? (3) would reversing or preventing the formation of adrenochrome be therapeutic for schizophrenia? Because adrenochrome in solution is highly reactive, extracting it directly from the body is problematic. When scientists observed adrenalin turning pink in solution, it seemed likely that what happened in vitro could also occur in the body. All the conditions required for the oxidation of adrenalin to adrenochrome are present in the body. Psychological Effects of Adrenochrome It is not true to say that the “supposedly psychedelic properties” of adrenochrome “have been debunked”. Which is what the globalist propagandists would have you believe. Adrenochrome alters the EEG pattern of the brain and may affect the brain by interfering with the blood-brain barrier. It decreases the penetration of glucose into the brain, and it has been suggested that hallucinogens could act by decreasing transfer of glucose into the brain thereby inhibiting many enzyme systems in the brain. Adrenochrome causes perceptual changes, that are not usually as pronounced as those caused by LSD or mescalin, but the effect may last a long time. When Dr Hoffer took adrenochrome himself it caused a “two-week paranoid depression” and when a distinguished colleague of his took it they experienced a “one-week paranoid depressive reaction with visual illusions”. They experimented with LSD combined with adrenochrome and concluded that: “LSD did not act as a hallucinogen per se but that it induced an increase in the production of adrenochrome which was the hallucinogen. An individual who could not make enough adrenochrome would not be able to have the typical LSD reaction.” Fear and loathing adrenochrome trips “Some of the changes produced by adrenochrome may persist several days, and in some cases the effects nearly led to disastrous results. These experiences with adrenochrome have made us quite cautious with this drug which seems to be so mild in its action, but which can be SO dangerous because of the lack of insight it induces in some subjects.” Dr A . Hoffer In 1962, Dr. Hoffer reviewed many of the clinical trials of the psychological effects of adrenochrome performed on humans: A young 16-year-old girl (Miss F. M.), was given 50 mg of adrenochrome by vein and after 10 minutes, she developed a “feeling of estrangement and fear” perceptual changes ensued in that “all faces were strange; there were marked Deja vu, feelings of estrangement and unreality, and visual hallucinations.” She had developed a thought disorder “(her present life was merely a show and a replay of a previous period in her life; she was confused, rambling, and almost incoherent) and referential ideas with delusions of guilt, and she was paranoid.” A young 18-year-old boy (Mr D. S) was given 10 mg of adrenochrome by vein and almost immediately he became more relaxed but developed vivid hallucinations. “He could see his hands growing larger and smaller, he could no longer estimate distance of people from himself, and pictures appeared very vivid”. An hour later when looking in a mirror, he saw “his face divided into two halves, one white and one black.” This continued for the next 6 days whenever he became very tense. Schwarz et al. (1956a) gave 50, 60, and 75 mg of adrenochrome by vein to a male subject who “suffered body image disturbances and had a loosening of associations.” They gave another male subject 50 and 60 mg of adrenochrome who developed “a pleasant smile and marked relaxation.” He experienced catalepsy both times which persisted for more than 30 minutes. He held his arms in unnatural positions for long periods of time. Catalepsy is a nervous condition characterised by muscular rigidity and fixed posture regardless of external stimuli, as well as decreased sensitivity to pain. An epileptic patient was “very relaxed and drowsy” after adrenochrome but there were no other changes. Taubmann and Jantz (1957) administered adrenochrome sublingually to their test subjects to avoid decomposition of the substance by the blood and liver. They saw “marked psychological activity” in their subjects. Grof et al (1961) purchased adrenochrome from L. Light and Company or obtained it from Dr. V. Vitek who synthesised it to perform a year long study. They performed double blind placebo studies on 15 volunteers using “intelligent, educated, normal subjects as well as some psychiatric patients”. They used 15 and 30 mg dose of adrenochrome given sublingually. Four people experienced “depersonalization and derealization” in body image including one who “felt his legs were short”. Five people experienced visual perceptual changes which ranged from “increased sensitivity to colour, to illusions, pseudo-hallucinations, and hallucinations”. Auditory changes were reported by 4 people and included increased acuity for sound to clear auditory hallucinations of “mysterious messages in telegraphic code coming from the universe”. Three people experienced tactile hallucinations. Eight experienced alterations in perception and estimation of time. One developed negativism, ambivalence, and splitting of personality. Another developed “inappropriate behaviour” like “sitting in a wastebasket or creeping along the floor”. Two subjects had no insight into the fact that their mental condition had been changed. The most sensitive method for demonstrating the effects of adrenochrome was the word-association experiment. There was a high level of disturbed associations compared to the placebo experiments. The time between stimulus word and response (latency period), was prolonged significantly by adrenochrome, and 25% of the test subjects showed disturbed word associations. The researchers discovered that in many cases “the subjects formed answers before they understood the meaning of the stimulus word”. In a few people, these disturbed associations persisted until the next placebo experiment which was something that had never been observed with LSD, mescaline, or psilocybine. It was concluded that the changes in thinking induced by adrenochrome were similar to those observed in schizophrenia. Adrenochrome caused an “elective inhibition of the process which determines the content of associative thinking”. This occurred in doses which did not “heighten lability of basic processes, did not reduce excitation, and did not loosen temporary connections as was the case with LSD”. Sommer et al. (1960) used 30mg of adrenochrome administered sublingually to nine people. Six experienced “euphoria and silly laughter or giggling”. Three became anxious, one was fearful, and one became hostile and depressed. Very often the initial tension or anxiety was replaced by euphoria and relaxation. In another adrenochrome experiment the researcher gives this very interesting account of the response of one man: “While lined up in a cafeteria for coffee, the other people appeared to be puppets. When he drank his coffee, he complained about the noisiness. He felt the people around him were puppet like, lacked understanding. They annoyed him but he stated he was superior to them. They seemed empty people…The white uniforms of nurses in the cafeteria annoyed him.” Some drugs, such as LSD, increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier which enables certain intravenously injected drugs to act on selected brain centres not normally accessible. With this in mind, some researchers investigated how people reacted to the combination of LSD followed by adrenochrome. They discovered a marked potentiat… truncated (26,211 more characters in archive)