TextSearch

Did Nero Really Burn Down Rome? The Truth Behind the Myth | Walks Inside Rome

The emperor Nero is infamous for setting the imperial capital ablaze (and fiddling while he watched it burn). Is there any truth in this?

· archived 5/18/2026, 12:38:51 AMscreenshotcached html
Did Nero Really Burn Down Rome? The Truth Behind the Myth | Walks Inside Rome .woocommerce-product-gallery{ opacity: 1 !important; } Home Tours Vatican Tours Special Tours Venice Tours Florence tours Pompeii and Amalfi Tours Most Popular Tours Colosseum Tours Small Group Tours Culinary Experiences Rome culinary experiences Florence Venice Cinque Terre Alba and Langhe Amalfi Coast, Capri and Pompeii Puglia and Matera Sicily and Pantelleria Kids & Families Rome Kids & Families Experiences Rome Kids & Families Tours Vatican Kids and Families Tours Venice Kids & Families Experiences Venice Kids and Families Tours Cooking Classes for Kids in Rome Login Account Contact Info Address: Via Giustiniani, 23, 00186 Roma RM Phone: (0039) 06 6624626 Mobile: (0039) 334 7243374 Emergency: (0039) 335 8193359 Email: [email protected] MENUMENUHomeTours Most Popular ToursSpecial ToursColosseum ToursSmall Group Tours Vatican ToursFlorence toursVenice ToursPompeii and Amalfi Tours Culinary Experiences Rome culinary experiencesFlorenceVeniceCinque Terre Alba and LangheAmalfi Coast, Capri and PompeiiPuglia and MateraSicily and Pantelleria Kids & Families Rome Kids & Families ExperiencesRome Kids & Families ToursVatican Kids and Families Tours Venice Kids & Families ExperiencesVenice Kids and Families ToursCooking Classes for Kids in Rome LoginAccount Call Now Whatsapp 0 Did Nero Really Burn Down Rome? The Truth Behind the Myth Home / Blog / Did Nero Really Burn Down Rome? The Truth Behind the Myth If the mad, bad, and dangerous-t0-know emperor Nero is famous for one thing it’s fiddling while Rome burned. The image of him performing with glee as the imperial capital burned around him has entered our lexicon. Serving as a metaphor for gross incompetence and inversion of priorities in the midst of a crisis. The event in question was the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD. Starting in the shops around the Circus Maximus, the fire raged for 9 days, destroying two thirds of the imperial capital. It was by no means the only fire to devastate the sprawling city. Rome’s wooden architecture and its population’s close confinement sparked numerous incendiaries that tore through the capital. But the Great Fire is notorious for one reason – many believed the emperor had started it. We have three ancient sources for Nero’s involvement in the Great Fire: Suetonius, Tacitus, and Cassius Dio. What the ancient authors say Our first author, Suetonius, was an imperial courtier, who wrote his biographies of the first twelve emperors in the 110s and 120s – around 50 years after Nero’s reign. Suetonius’ largely sensationalist account describes how, as if upset by the ugliness of Rome’s architecture and its narrow, winding streets, Nero ordered the city to be set ablaze. Watching from the Tower of Maecenas (today the Torre delle Milizie overlooking the Roman Forum) and dressed up, as he often was, in stage costume, Nero warbled his way through “The Fall of Troy”.  A popular musical throwback to another fire-consumed ancient city. Our second source, Tacitus, is less sure about Nero’s involvement.  The greatest of Rome’s historians expresses doubt as to whether Nero arranged for the fire. Some suggested he did, Tacitus muses, others put it down to divine providence. Tacitus does, however, tell us that Nero was away from Rome in the coastal town of Antium when the conflagration broke out. And that he only returned to the capital when it threatened the palace he had built between the Tower of Maecenas and the Palatine Hill. Tacitus further credits Nero with helping out Rome’s traumatised citizenry, many of whom were said to have committed suicide upon realising they had lost everything to the flames. While some wandered Rome’s streets either fanning the flames or looting, Tacitus tells us that Nero did his best to help those most afflicted. Throwing open his private gardens to house the homeless and reducing the corn-price to help the poor.  Tacitus does tell us of a rumour that went around about Nero singing “the Fall of Troy”. But he is adamant that it was just that – a rumour. Our third source, Cassius Dio, is of comparatively little use. Writing around 150 years after the Great Fire of Rome, he seems to have based his history on Suetonius’s biography, as he reports Nero’s complicity in the fire as concrete fact. But if the disagreement among our three sources isn’t enough to debunk one of history’s most pervasive myths, there’s one final detail: the fiddle wasn’t invented until around the eleventh century.  So even if Nero did indeed accompany himself to “the Fall of Troy”, it would have had to be with the cithara! So where does the story that Nero burned Rome down come from? In most likelihood, the accusation that Nero burned down vast swathes of the imperial capital was made retrospectively, by the emperors political enemies and imperial successors. The image of Nero fiddling while Rome burned and revelling in the destruction is just too farfetched to fathom. It renders Nero a caricature of his worst characteristics. The all-singing, all-dancing performer who’s more interested in matters of the stage and being accepted as an artist than in traditional Roman values of militarism and modesty. It’s hard to describe just how shocking it would have been to see a Roman emperor playing the fiddle or performing on stage. But imagine Queen Elizabeth II pole dancing and you get something of the idea!  Nero’s behaviour in the wake of the disaster certainly didn’t help to fan the rumour’s flames. The emperor used the land cleared by the conflagration as the site for his Domus Aurea (Golden Palace) – an almost indescribably luxurious palace spanning much of the Oppian Hill. Only a fraction of the Domus Aurea remains – though you can visit it on an experience which brings this remarkable palace to life with Virtual Reality. More often visited is the structure which Nero’s Flavian successors built on the site of his Golden Palace: the Flavian Amphitheater, which we now know as the Colosseum. Written by Alexander Meddings #Ancient History#Emperor Nero#Fiddling while Rome Burned#Great Fire of Rome#Nero#Roman Emperor#Roman Emperors#Rome Posted By Alexander Meddings Alexander Meddings is an experienced copywriter and content specialist. After completing his MPhil in Ancient History at the University of Oxford, he moved to Rome to pursue his passion at the source. Reach him for enquiries at www.alexandermeddings.com You might also like 13 August, 2020 The Scandalous Private Life of Tiberius Caesar 25 June, 2020 Demystifying Domitian: Rome’s Most Misunderstood Emperor? 14 May, 2020 Julius Caesar’s Scandalous Sex Life For More Information (0039) 334 7243374 Mon - Sat / 08:30 AM - 8:30 PM Related Tours About Us Attractions Blog Contact us Sitemap Travel Advice and Guidance Rome Guided Tours Cooking Classes in Rome Day trips from Rome Rome Small Group Tours Sustainability About Rome What to do in Rome Payment Methods: Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Copyright © 1990-2022 Secrets Italy by Walks Inside Rome srl Via Giustiniani 23, 00186 Rome. P.IVA 12144571002 Autorizzazione Provincia di Roma N°154320/14 Iscrizione al registro Imprese RM1353660 C.C.I.A.A. di Roma Share Did Nero Really Burn Down Rome? The Truth Behind the Myth 1 Sign in Remember me Log in Forgot your password? Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive mail with link to set new password. Reset password Back to login ×InformativaNoi e terze parti selezionate utilizziamo cookie o tecnologie simili per finalità tecniche e, con il tuo consenso, anche per altre finalità come specificato nella cookie policy. Il rifiuto del consenso può rendere non disponibili le relative funzioni.Usa il pulsante “Accetta” o chiudi questa informativa per acconsentire. Premi ancora per continuare 0/2Scopri di piùAccetta Chat