Did Aliens Build the Pyramids? – SAPIENS Anthropology Magazine Is War Inevitable? Consider the Ancient Maya Standpoints Best of SAPIENS 2022 Letters A Native Alaska Community’s Reckoning With Vaccine Hesitancy Maladies Did Meat Do Neanderthals In? Unearthed A Major Museum’s Attempt to Center Native American Voices Viewpoint The Dangers of Ancient Apocalypse’s Pseudoscience Counterpoint How a Song Bridged Diné and Ndebele Worlds Expressions How Diverse Was Medieval Britain? Decoded A Mass Shooting in the “Evangelical Vatican” Reflections Monogamy. Grandmas. Milk. The Evolution of Childhood Is Very Strange. Excerpt What Commentators Get Wrong (and Right) About North Korea Conflicted Broadening Demands for Reproductive Justice Standpoints Do Mountains Have Souls? Phenomenon What Is Linguistic Anthropology? Ask SAPIENS A Somali Archaeologist Is Championing Heritage in the Horn of Africa Field Notes Heritage Forensics Is Tackling Devastating New Forms of Cultural Erasure Crisis The Family Lives of the Last Neanderthals Kinship Alive in the Flapping of Infinite Orange Wings Entanglements Purple in Cycles Reflections Hunting Down the Facts About Paleo Diets Counterpoint The Aztec Antichrist Chronicles Indigenous Resistance and Religious Conversion Decoded Aztec Antichrist: A Performance of the Apocalypse Excerpt Centering the Voices of Victims and Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse Reflections What Cargo Cult Rituals Reveal About Human Nature Decoded Will a Nobel Prize Make Paleogenomics More Accountable? Decoded How Can Societies Decolonize Conservation? Viewpoint Unsung Native Collaborators in Anthropology Icons Why AI Will Never Fully Capture Human Language Decoded Why Indigenous Fire Management Works Cultural Relativity Derogatory Place Names Need Indigenous Revision Counterpoint Confronting Xenophobia Through Food—and Comics Field Notes Extracting Hominin Evolution From Fossilized Teeth Unearthed Search + - Branch + - Story type + - Tags ↻ Clear Archaeology Biology Culture Language Column Essay Interview Op-ed Photo Essay Poem Video History Environment Indigenous Identity Health Opinion Violence Politics Emotions Relationships Race Biology More... Migration Science Food Economics Power Communication Ritual Place Policy Mind Ethics Evolution Paleolithic Memory Gender Disasters Preservation War Medicine Death Art Animals Religion Law Genetics Methods Sex Hominins Primates Video Development Sports Urban Disease Colonialism Technology Space Heritage Agriculture Museums Climate Change Water Music Media Activism Crime Kinship Education Labor Children Conservation Clothing Disability Dance ↻ Clear Copy link Facebook Twitter Email Print Republish Share Republish You may republish this article, either online and/or in print, under the Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 license. We ask that you follow these simple guidelines to comply with the requirements of the license. In short, you may not make edits beyond minor stylistic changes, and you must credit the author and note that the article was originally published on SAPIENS. Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder. Read this article in: Español (Spanish) Love our work? Your support keeps SAPIENS accessible to all. Donate Donate (RE)THINK HUMAN Get our newsletter with new stories delivered to your inbox every Friday. Subscribe Newsletter Essay / Lost in Translation Did Aliens Build the Pyramids? And Other Racist Theories Pseudoarchaeology, conspiracy theories that ancient civilizations were founded by aliens or the denizens of Atlantis, are more than just silly—they’re dangerous. By Stephanie Halmhofer 5 Oct 2021 The Egyptian pyramids are a focal point for conspiracy theories about alien intervention. Sheilapic76/Flickr ✽ One afternoon in June, I found an email in my inbox from Atlantis Rising: The Research Group. The blog and YouTube channel claims to “challenge orthodox thinking” and archaeologically explore questions about human history that are “still largely neglected by academia.” Questions like: “Were aliens involved?” It might be easy to simply dismiss organizations that push speculative conspiracy theories while presenting themselves as purveyors of supressed knowledge. But what caught my attention in this email was a section advertising a video interview with Frank Joseph. Since 1987, Joseph has published several books, mainly focused on the mythical continent of Atlantis. From 1993 to 2007, Joseph was also the editor-in-chief of the pseudoarchaeological Ancient American magazine. Perhaps more importantly, Frank Joseph is the pen name for Frank Collin, who was the former coordinator for the American Nazi Party and founder of the National Socialist Party of America. This is who Atlantis Rising was recommending to their audience. For a long time, pseudoarchaeology was pushed to the fringe by archaeologists as something not worth their attention. But the fringe is where ideas can fester and become dangerous. The idea of a lost city or continent called Atlantis persists in the public imagination. George Grie/Wikimedia Commons As an archaeologist currently working on my doctorate, I have spent the last year examining the ways various groups, such as white nationalists, use pseudoarchaeology in their worldviews. [1] [1] In this article, white is styled lowercase throughout, contrary to SAPIENS’ house style, at the request of the author. Understanding this feels particularly important today, considering the recent increase of such groups in the United States. According to a 2019 report from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the number of white nationalist hate groups in the United States increased by 55 percent between 2017 and 2019. Pseudoarchaeology comes in many shapes and forms but relies on the same core argument: People of the past did not have the knowledge, technology, and/or capability to achieve all that they are said to have accomplished, so someone or something else was involved. Ancient alien proponents will tell you Egypt’s great pyramids, for example, or Peru’s Nazca lines were really due to extraterrestrials, while hyperdiffiusionist proponents will tell you they were built by residents of Atlantis, or another “highly advanced civilization” that lived more than 13,000 years ago. Archaeologists are often accused of conspiring to hide the “truth” of these histories. These pseudoarchaeological arguments may seem to be simply fun to entertain. But they are invariably heavily biased against Black people, Indigenous peoples, and other people of color (BIPOC), who are doubted to have been responsible for their own histories. Archaeological sites from Africa, Asia, and the Americas are often put forth as proof of external interventions, while the achievements of those who lived in ancient Greece or Italy, for example, are rarely questioned. In other words, these arguments are often racist. ✽ While arguments about extraterrestrial or Atlantean ancestors may seem outlandish, some people do believe in these arguments. Chapman University in California, which conducted the Survey of American Fears between 2016 and 2018, found in 2018 that 57 percent of their respondents believed that ancient advanced civilizations such as Atlantis existed (a 17 percent increase from 2016), and 41 percent believed that aliens visited the Earth in the ancient past (a 14 percent increase from 2016). These have become more than just beliefs: They’re realities for those who have embraced them. Fifty-seven percent of survey respondents believed that ancient advanced civilizations such as Atlantis existed. Pseudoarchaeology is useful to white nationalism specifically because it casts doubt on the achievements of BIPOC communities, opening the doors to rewriting history through a white power lens. The SPLC has noticed this and written about connections between pseudoarchaeology and far-right ideologies such as antisemitism and white nationalism. White nationalism is a pro-white racial ideology that shares many interests with white supremacy, such as anti-immigration stances and beliefs that the interests of white people must be placed first. White nationalists also encourage enhanced protections and rights to defend what they see as the “purity” of the white race, a pseudoscientific concept built on extremely reimagined views of history and genetic ancestry. A core belief of white nationalism is a conspiracy theory referred to as the “great replacement,” which suggests a “white genocide” is happening: that white people are nearing extinction and need to be protected. Though anthropologists and geneticists have long noted that race is not a genetically defined concept but rather socially defined, white nationalists have sought to genetically define and support the concept of a “pure white race.” For example, at-home genetic ancestry tests have become popular with white nationalists, who reinterpret the results in a variety of ways to support their beliefs that a “pure white race” exists and that, without protection, this special race will be replaced. ✽ Although ancient alien theories have been discussed on white nationalist websites such as Stormfront and the Renegade Tribune, it is hyperdiffusionist theories—the distribution of cultural traits or people spread across vast distances—about Atlantis, Aryans, and Solutreans that are especially popular with white nationalists in North America. Hyperdiffusionist theories are the easiest to adapt to the conspiracy of replacement: ancient white Atlanteans, Aryans, or Solutreans traveled to North America first and were “replaced” by Indigenous peoples. For example, books and articles by Frank Joseph and Patrick Chouinard, a regular contributor to the Renegade Tribune, adhere to early 20th-century Nazi beliefs that white Aryans were descended from the people of Atlantis, who purportedly also spread to the Americas tens of thousands of years ago and brought technology and wisdom with them. Joseph and Chouinard argue that these white descendants in North America were replaced over time by Indigenous peoples. The Solutrean culture lived in Europe some 20,000 years ago. There is no convincing evidence that they were the first settlers of North America. Sémhur and MPants at work/Wikimedia Commons Similarly, writers on Stormfront argue in support of the Solutrean hypothesis, a hypothesis widely rejected by archaeologists that proposes people from the Solutrean culture of southwestern Europe were the first to settle on the east coast of North America between 17,000 and 20,000 years ago. On Stormfront, science suggesting the Solutrean people had darker skin is ignored, and instead people argue that white Solutreans in North America were abruptly and violently displaced by Indigenous peoples. Archaeological evidence does not support these theories. While the full story of life during the Pleistocene in the Americas is still evolving, there is no evidence for a violent displacement of white Solutreans anywhere in North America, at any point in time. The continent was always the land of Indigenous peoples. Read more from the archives: “Archaeologists Should Be Activists Too.” Pseudoarchaeology contributes to the marginalization of BIPOC communities by denying their histories and instead reattributing them to mythical continents or even extraterrestrials. White nationalists use this denialism to rewrite—or rather “re-white”—history to bolster their own systems of power. The public and the discipline must challenge pseudoarchaeology and the violent, white power structures that often use it to support their own goals. It is through these challenges that all of us can support recentering the voices of marginalized groups in telling their own histories and ensure those are the histories being heard. Stephanie Halmhofer Stephanie Halmhofer is an archaeologist in Canada. She is a Ph.D. student in the anthropology department at the University of Alberta and a scholar of the Institute of Prairie and Indigenous Archaeology. Her doctoral research examines the use of archaeology and pseudoarchaeology by historic and contemporary far-right and conspiritual movements in North America. Open Bio Close Bio Copy link Facebook Twitter Email Print Republish Share Republish You may republish this article, either online and/or in print, under the Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 license. We ask that you follow these simple guidelines to comply with the requirements of the license. In short, you may not make edits beyond minor stylistic changes, and you must credit the author and note that the article was originally published on SAPIENS. Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder. Read this article in: Español (Spanish) Love our work? Your support keeps SAPIENS accessible to all. Donate Donate (RE)THINK HUMAN Get our newsletter with new stories delivered to your inbox every Friday. Subscribe Newsletter Suggestions for You Why Are Black People’s Remains in Museums? Human Rights Haunted by My Teaching Skeleton Identities Who Gets to Study Whom? Identities The Sisters of Loretto Share a Kinship With the Earth Dwelling The Blockbuster Exhibit That Shouldn’t Have Been Curiosities Is Donated Blood a Gift or a Commodity? Culture Lab Does DNA Simplify or Complicate Repatriation Claims? Counterpoint Repatriation Has Transformed, Not Ended, Research Material World ←Back to Menu All Articles Podcast Teaching Write Contributors Donate About Staff Contact An editorially independent anthropology magazine of the Wenner-Gren Foundation & University of Chicago Press