Blair Blair Blair was Her Majesty's Prime Minister and the supremely bad one having done more to destroy liberty than any other. He is however effective. So was Adolf but it was not remembered to his credit. Here are some essays on Blair and his works. “And remember, where you have a concentration of power in a few hands, all too frequently men with the mentality of gangsters get control. History has proven that. All power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Lord Acton misquoted on Politics Blair Is A War Criminal On The Run Blair Is An Embarrassment Says Guardian Blair is a shit driven by greed says Grauniad. It took them years to admit his evil but even they got there in the end albeit there is no mention of screwing Murdoch's wife. Lord Butler lambasts Blair Robin Butler as Cabinet Secretary knew Blair all to well. Given that the supreme civil servant, a man in a position of utter trust should break precedent to abuse Her Majesty's prime minister is remarkable in itself. That is over and above the substance of his remarks. Blair's Old Woman Is A Superstitious Fool Says Ugly JewCohen is also a Marxist so you might ask why he is abusing her. The answer: Blair is past his Sell By Date. Why Blair Must Be DestroyedSean Gabb, England's leading Libertarian explains. Hank Gonzales, former Mayor of Mexico City and billionaire said: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician" Faces of Evil. Blair's Woman is on the Left and even Uglier He didn't need anyone whispering in his ear at night. If any question Why we died, Tell them because Our fathers lied. Epitaphs of War, (1914-1918) and Kipling - he lost a son to the Western Front. A Dead Statesman I could not dig: I dared not rob: Therefore I lied to please the mob. Now all my lies are proved untrue And I must face the men I slew. What tale shall serve me here among Mine angry and defrauded young? Kipling: EPITAPHS 1914 With friends like Blair who needs enemies? Illegal immigrants for votes, Jews for finance & the working man be damned. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2002302/How-onetime-Labour-bigwigs-raking-private-sector.html They walk laughing. They walk into money, the golden shower, the pay offs for services rendered. Blair Is Not Even Good At Lying This is from Robert Henderson who loathes Blair with reason. Blair Fingered By Brown QUOTEThe screamed threat “I’ll bring you down with sleaze” that the fiery Scot is alleged to have launched at the Prime Minister has, understandably, hogged the headlines. However, what most people seem to have missed is that Chancellor Brown yelled this (with or without accompanying mobile phone we do not know) according to witnesses in March 2006….six months before Blair finally handed over the reins of power.UNQUOTE This tells us WHEN Brown found the crime he needed to blackmail Bliar. Brown Blackmails Blair QUOTE Like John F. Kennedy thirty-seven years earlier, Tony Blair came to power with a clean-cut, charismatic image that promised 'safe' change, more social justice, and a strong head on his shoulders. But also like JFK, the youthful leader of 'New' Labour had more than a few skeletons trailing behind him. True or not, they remain the subject of intense gossip - and a number of incontrovertible facts - to this day. ....... Ugly Rumours While researching Blair's early Parliamentary career, The Slog (or Not Born Yesterday as it then was) received the following email content: 'In the autumn of 1983, a young well-dressed man presented himself to Bow St Magistrates' Court on a morals charge. He was given a conditional discharge and bound over to keep the peace. The young man gave his name as Charles Lynton. He is now among the highest in the land.' Blair's middle names are Charles and Lynton. I have asked for the records of the period (the Court no longer exists) but failed to trace any mention there of the 'case' - if indeed it ever existed......... By 1988, Tony Blair had already formed his two strongest alliances: one with the Party's spin-doctor Peter Mandelson (just like him in many ways) and the other with Gordon Brown (unlike him in almost every way imaginable). Brown and Mandy disliked each other on sight........ New Tony, New Labour Now leader, Blair set about rapidly betraying almost everything Labour stood for. With the repositioning help of obscure adman Phil Gould, he basically gave Thatcherism a human smile and a soft edge - 'tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime', for example....although Brown continues to insist that he came up with the sound bite......... 1. Several sources cite this as the period when Blair allegedly had a 'brief dalliance' with another person. And 2. Others allege that there were 'some unpleasant' aspects to the case....and that Gordon Brown knew of these........ Other ticking time bombs Having already discounted two (perhaps three) alleged subjects for blackmail, it will be useful at this point to list the others bandied around by gossips, bloggers and genuine insiders. In no particular order they are:............ * Corruption relating to the Saudis from which Blair is said to have benefited personally on a massive scale. ( The BaE arms-supply bribery scandal, dating back to a deal in the mid 1980s) - [ I thought Maggie came in for a few mill on the Al Yamamah Job - Editor ] * The death of senior MoD civil servant David Kelly following leaks about the 'dodgy WMD dossier' to the BBC * A new allegation of which The Slog was made aware last month. This latest allegation has largely inspired The Slogger's consistent blogging on the subject in recent weeks........... The fact is, I don't have the proof [ as distinct from knowledge - Ed. ] any more than anyone else does. But three mysteries remain, and deserve further investigation: 1. Why was Tony Blair's decision to let the worst man for the job get it so very sudden? 2. Why are so many people in and around the Westminster village prepared to believe that both Blair and Brown are corrupt and ruthless? 3. Why did Tony Blair push through a sale of radar to an obscure country at an inflated price in the teeth of widespread opposition?UNQUOTEIf anyone chooses to tell us that Blair is utterly corrupt I am happy to believe him. I fancy that Slog knows what Blair did but cannot prove it. Blair is a War Criminal just like Cameron, Brown, Bush, Clinton... the list goes on. Blair, Treason And Communists [ 20 November 2009 ]QUOTEOn the whole, however, the communist infiltration of the T&G is hardly a joking matter: its influence in the Labour party was substantial. The decision to give Gordon Brown his first and only safe seat, Dunfermline East, was made by two T&G officials: Hugh Wyper, the regional boss and a Communist Party member, and Alec Kitson. This is not exceptional. Neil Kinnock, Tony Blair, Margaret Beckett, Harriet Harman, John Reid — to name just a few — were all T&G people who made their Labour party careers thanks to the union’s backing. And at that time, of course, T&G political backing was within the gift of Alec Kitson. Chernyaev only saw part of the story however. Other documents, still secret, show Labour’s Soviet relationships ran still deeper.UNQUOTEWhat a surprise that it. Well, perhaps not. Pandering to anyone and everyone who will give him leg up is the mark of a real politician, an unprincipled politician, a greedy politicians, a man desperate for power to harass us. Blair and the Army Blair sent the Army on another fool's errand; to murder people in Yugoslavia for some reason or other. Who remembers? Who cares? The dead say nothing. Blair laughs. Blair gets rich. Blair has bodyguards. Blair Cashing In He was in it for the money as well as the power to ruin our lives. The pay off was big time. Who paid and, more to the point, why? Blair and Corruption Blair is a master patter merchant and walked away with lotsa money; post dated cheques or not as the case may be. Blair And Jews It seems that he has a touch of Jew in his background. Blair's Protection of Elite Paedophile Rings Spells the End For His Career Mike James' prediction did not come to pass, sad to say. His accusation is still [ March 2010 ] out there on the Net for anyone who wants to read it. Blair is a lawyer and perfectly capable of suing for libel if he wants. It seems clear that he has not. More sources on this one are at Brown Accused Of Being A Paedophile Blair And Yugoslavia He sent the RAF to bomb the place for some reason. He killed for some reason. Blair is a war criminal. Blair and New Labour Andrew Rawnsley tells us that Blair lied to 400 Labour MPs on the day that he won power. Did they complain? Not as far as I know. Mr. Rawnsley worked for the BBC and The Observer which means that he is a communist subversive or, at least a leftie. Blair and Payments for Honours Bribery is illegal in England even if it is to get peerages and even if the bribes get called loans. One Pakistani was simple minded enough to complain that his bribe did not get a result. They are more honest where he comes from. They expect to get a result when they hand over their brown envelopes. But Blair walked away laughing. Surprised? Nor me. Blair Lied In Order To Make War Blair lied but then that is what Blair does. His weapon of choice is treachery. Blair On The Run Blair is a war criminal who sent men to their deaths, knowingly without caring in the slightest. Arrest him, charge him and see him lie his way out of it. PS There is a reward too. Blair Picture Competition This was for fun. His old woman gets photographed. She is more than passing ugly. Some of the pictures show him looking like a slimy little salesman losing a big deal. Blair the Liar Many politicians are liars. Some get forced into it. Blair is too enthusiastic for that. Blair looks amazed at getting away with it. Blair the Zionist Puppet Pandering to the Israelis has cost men's lives and billions of our money. Invading Iraq to steal oil for the Jews is a war crime but he will get away with it. Politics as normal. Blair's Ten Big Issues Blair's web site tells us about his Ten Big Issues. Iraq doesn't make it while Englishmen die for a foreign power. Blair's Manifesto Read the promises. Read the lies and know that they were lies. Blair's Old Woman And Corruption QUOTE The case of Cherie Blair provides a grotesque illustration of the attitudes and practices of the new Political Class. The Prime Minister's wife manifested a new morality in the heart of government, namely that it was acceptable to use the highest office as a method of personal enrichment............ In June 2005 she was paid some £30,000 to be interviewed before an audience by the CNN anchorwoman Paula Zahn, while Tony Blair was on an official visit to the White House. Sir David Manning, British ambassador to Washington and seemingly willing to stretch any point well beyond the cause of duty as far as Tony and Cherie Blair were concerned, made a warm-up speech............ Mrs. Blair's behaviour on this occasion nevertheless stretched the tolerance of the Prime Minister's civil service advisers past breaking point. She was strongly advised in advance not to take up this engagement by Cabinet Secretary Andrew Turnbull. Turnbull urged her not to embark on the undertaking at all, adding that, if she did insist on going ahead, she should donate her fee to charity. Cherie ignored this advice, saying: "Maybe we should not have done this, but we are in too deep." Mrs. Blair's speaking tour of Australia at the start of 2005 was another notable infraction. She agreed to make a series of speeches, one to raise funds for the Children's Cancer Institute Australia, a research charity. UNQUOTE Blair is a lawyer and she understands the fraudulent misapplication of funds when she wants to. Her old man is just as bent and it is entirely likely that she perverted him. Also at The rise of the sleaze-ocrats in Britain's ruling class Blair by Sean Gabb QUOTE In part, I say this without irony. Tony Blair is not merely a bad Prime Minister - he is also a profoundly bad man. He is driven by a hatred of England and its people. He is a liar, a traitor, a war monger. He has the blood of thousands on his hands. Not since the time of James II have we had a government directed so plainly to the abolition of our liberties. At no time in our history has an attack on these liberties been so sustained or so successful. So far as he opposes the continual forward drive of the Blair Government, and so far as he might be able to replace it, I welcome the election of Mr. Cameron. This is not saying much. Let it be granted that they might combine, and that they might also be able to beat Mr. Blair, I should probably welcome a coalition of George Galloway, Abu Hamza and Nick Griffin. The most important short term objective of anyone who cares about England must be to pull down Tony Blair and to execrate his memory. UNQUOTE Lord Butler on Blair For the Cabinet Secretary to talk about the prime minister in public is utterly unprecedented and a very good thing with the worst prime minister ever. Impeach Blair CampaignQUOTEOn 26 August 2004, a cross-party group of British MPs announced their campaign to impeach the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom at the time, Tony Blair for high crimes and misdemeanours. A campaign to impeach the US President, George W. Bush began around the same time and alleged evidence of collusion between the two leaders has since surfaced.UNQUOTE Some MPs are on the right lines. They failed sad to say. A Case to Answer gives the evidence against him. The War - Won but not Over QUOTE Until Saturday, I was willing to believe that such weapons would be “found” by the Americans. They had the means, motive and opportunity for planting them. But the surrender of Amir Hamudi Hasan al-Sadi has complicated any such plan. He was the chief weapons adviser to the Iraqi Government. Before the war, he had repeatedly denied that his country had any of the weapons it was alleged to have. He helped reveal the report on Iraqi weapons published by the British Government as a mass of lies—and often of plagiarized and obsolete lies. For his own safety, it was in his interest, once the war was over, to confess that he had been lying, and to validate all American claims. In fact, he called a news conference before surrendering and repeated his earlier denials: “I was knowledgeable about these programmes” he said. “I never told anything but the truth and time will bear me out”. Bearing in mind how little shame the present Government of America has about torturing prisoners of war, it will be interesting to see how long Mr. al-Sudi maintains this insistence. But no amount of retraction will now be believed. There were no “weapons of mass destruction”. There was no danger to this country. We were lied into this war. UNQUOTE We were lied into it by war criminals, Bush and Blair are the chief liars. Did Blair Approve NHS Scheme Without Knowing The Full Risks? [ 6 December 2008 ] QUOTEThe national programme is projected to cost between £18.6bn and £31bn over its 10-year life. UNQUOTEDid Blair even care about the cost? He knew that he would be long gone when the chickens came home to roost. Quite apart from which a few more billion here and there were going to make him a lot of friends among people who matter. A lot of civil servants will walk away and get their golden hellos. Pensioners freezing? Who cares as long as they vote Labour? Foot and mouth 'has cost £20 billion in lost business' [ 6 December 2008 ] QUOTELast Updated: 9:57AM BST 20 Jul 2001 FOOT and mouth has cost the economy £20 billion and the figure could double if the epidemic drags on until July, the Institute of Directors said yesterday. It was the institute's bleakest assessment yet, as cases of the disease rose by 15 to 1,400. But Prof David King, the Government's chief scientist, pronounced the epidemic "fully under control" [ Fool or rogue? Pass. Wrong at all events - Editor ]. He said there had been a significant drop in the daily number of cases over the past two weeks and forecast that this would be down to one or two a day by the likely date of the election on June 7. Leading vets and farmers' leaders disagree. They expect the epidemic to last far beyond July and perhaps until the end of the year. The institute, which represents 54,000 businesses, said the Government faced a huge demand for assistance across a wide spectrum of industry and commerce. UNQUOTEBlair used a computer wallah who knew nothing about the disease and kept on backing his guesswork long after it made sense but it was only other people's money and farmers committing suicide, not him. Blair And The £4 Billion Gas Deal [ 2 November 2009 ]QUOTE Gas from Gaza, mobile phones in Palestine and a $1m peace prize ...Tony Blair and the Middle Eastern Eldorado July 25, 2003: In the middle of that blazing summer, Prime Minister Tony Blair sat at his desk in Downing Street to write to his counterpart in Israel, Ariel Sharon [ the well known mass murderer - Editor ]........ Yet the rest of his cordial letter said nothing about peace or politics. Instead, it was concerned solely with business - a plea to Sharon to let a British Gas-led consortium start work in a vast natural gas field off the coast of the Palestinian Gaza Strip, a deal worth at least £4billion.UNQUOTE Blair is greedy as well as evil. One major reason for the Gaza Massacre was to steal Gaza's off shore gas fields. Blair had his sticky fingers in that pie - Gaza Gas Murder and Robbery Blair, Corruption And War Crime [ 28 January 2010 ]QUOTE Why has this been put in writing?Such was the shocking question asked by Downing Street when the chief lawyer at the Foreign Office warned Tony Blair's government of the consequences of going to war in Iraq without legal authority. With those seven damning words of his evidence to the Chilcot inquiry, Sir Michael Wood throws back the curtain on the secrecy, impropriety and deceit that surrounded Mr. Blair's decision to send British troops to their deaths. Yesterday's testimony is the most devastating yet in an inquiry that has already established how the great state institutions were subverted to satisfy one man's determination to go to war.UNQUOTEWill Blair get away with it? Believe it. There are too many other crooks who would go to the gallows if he were to get sorted out. Blair, The War Criminal Has A Price On His Head [ 27 January 2010 ]QUOTE The only question that counts is the one that the Chilcot inquiry won't address: was the war with Iraq illegal? If the answer is yes, everything changes. The war is no longer a political matter, but a criminal one, and those who commissioned it should be committed for trial for what the Nuremberg tribunal called "the supreme international crime": the crime of aggression........... Others have explored it, however. Two weeks ago a Dutch inquiry, led by a former supreme court judge, found that the invasion had "no sound mandate in international law". Last month Lord Steyn, a former law lord, said that "in the absence of a second UN resolution authorizing invasion, it was illegal". In November Lord Bingham, the former lord chief justice, stated that, without the blessing of the UN, the Iraq war was "a serious violation of international law and the rule of law".......... We also know that the UK government was aware that the war it intended to launch was illegal...... There are two problems. The first is that neither the government nor the opposition has any interest in pursuing these crimes, for the obvious reason that in doing so they would expose themselves to prosecution. The second … truncated (34,032 more characters in archive)