Tic Tac Oh! Are Strange Objects Sighted in U.S. Skies Extraterrestrial?
They’re unidentified objects that fly…just don’t call them UFO’s!They’re not saying it’s aliens…but they’re not saying it’s notCongress holding first hearing in more than
Tic Tac Oh! Are Strange Objects Sighted in U.S. Skies Extraterrestrial? - Parabolic Arc Skip to contentAdvertise on Parabolic ArcPolls Archive Parabolic ArcAll Space All the Time Advertise on Parabolic ArcPolls Archive Tic Tac Oh! Are Strange Objects Sighted in U.S. Skies Extraterrestrial? May 16, 2022May 16, 2022 Doug Messier News 13 Comments They’re unidentified objects that fly…just don’t call them UFO’s!They’re not saying it’s aliens…but they’re not saying it’s notCongress holding first hearing in more than 50 years on TuesdayPart II of IIby Douglas MessierManaging EditorDuring my recent visit to Roswell, NM, I toured a museum that posited the U.S. government covered up the crash of a spaceship with four aliens on a ranch outside the city 75 years ago. Although I came away far from convinced this actually happened, there was one thing I saw there that was seemed quite credible. (Part I: The Truth is Out There, Just Maybe Not in Roswell)I wandered into the museum’s small theater, which was showing an Australian news report on what the Pentagon has labeled unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) — what back in the day were known as unidentified flying objects (UFOs). (Apparently the DoD decided a rebrand was needed to make them sound less crackpotty.)Reports of these UAPs, which were nicknamed Tic Tacs due to their shape by a military pilot who saw one in 2004, are much more recent than the alleged Roswell incident. The witnesses are highly credible, there’s reliable videos of encounters with the objects, and a federal government has reversed decades of denials and begun to become more open on the subject.Something is out there. Nobody is quite sure what. Nobody is publicly saying they’re alien. On the other hand, they’re not entirely ruling it out, either.With Congress set to hold its first public hearing on UFOs UAPs in more than half a century on Tuesday morning, let’s look a closer a look at this subject.HearingDate/TimeWatch LiveHouse Intelligence Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation SubcommitteeTuesday, May 17 at 9:00 a.m. EDTWebcastChanging the Laws of PhysicsMontgomery Scott, chief engineer of the starship USS Enterprise, once famously opined that you can’t change the laws of physics. But one day in 2004, U.S. Navy pilots encountered a mysterious object that appeared to do exactly that off the coast of California. The New York Times was the first to report on the incident in a December 2017 story that focused on Navy Cmdr. David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Jim Slaight. (Story: 2 Navy Airmen and an Object That ‘Accelerated Like Nothing I’ve Ever Seen’)Then, Commander Fravor looked down to the sea. It was calm that day, but the waves were breaking over something that was just below the surface. Whatever it was, it was big enough to cause the sea to churn.Hovering 50 feet above the churn was an aircraft of some kind — whitish — that was around 40 feet long and oval in shape. The craft was jumping around erratically, staying over the wave disturbance but not moving in any specific direction, Commander Fravor said. The disturbance looked like frothy waves and foam, as if the water were boiling.Commander Fravor began a circular descent to get a closer look, but as he got nearer the object began ascending toward him. It was almost as if it were coming to meet him halfway, he said.Commander Fravor abandoned his slow circular descent and headed straight for the object.But then the object peeled away. “It accelerated like nothing I’ve ever seen,” he said in the interview. He was, he said, “pretty weirded out.”The USS Princeton, a Navy cruiser, directed the pilots to fly to a rendezvous point 60 miles away. The ship then told the pilots that the object had popped up on radar at that point in less than a minute.New York magazine interviewed Chad Underwood, the Navy pilot who took a video during the 2004 encounter. (Story: Navy Pilot Who Filmed the ‘Tic Tac’ UFO Speaks: ‘It Wasn’t Behaving by the Normal Laws of Physics’)In a military report made public by KLAS-TV in Las Vegas, another crew member with 17 years of experience on similar cruisers would later observe that the objects “exhibited ballistic-missile characteristics” as they zoomed from 60,000 feet to 50 feet above the Pacific Ocean, alarmingly without producing sonic booms. All told, radar operators with the Princeton spent about two weeks attempting to figure out what the objects were, a process that included having the ship’s radar system shut down and recalibrated to make sure that the mysterious radar returns were not not false positives, or “ghost tracks.”Eventually, David Fravor, commanding officer of the Black Aces, made visual confirmation of one of the objects midair during a flight-training exercise. An hour later, Underwood made his infrared recording on a second flight. “That day,” Underwood recalls, “Dave Fravor was like, ‘Hey, dude. BOLO.’ Like, be on the lookout for just something weird. I can’t remember the exact terms that he used. I didn’t really think much about it at the time. But once I was able to acquire it on the radar and on the FLIR [forward-looking infrared camera], that’s kind of where things — I wouldn’t say ‘went sideways’ — but things were just different.”The footage appears to depict what Fravor had identified as a 40-foot-long, white, oblong shape (hence “Tic Tac”), hovering somewhere between 15,000 and 24,000 feet in midair and exhibiting no notable exhaust from conventional propulsion sources, even as it makes a surprising dart leftward in the video’s final moments. Of the three UFO incidents captured by U.S. Navy airmen via infrared gun-camera pods, Underwood’s footage remains unique for its lack of cross talk between the pilots — a fact that has led to some speculation about its authenticity. But “there wasn’t anything on it that was protected,” Underwood’s retired former commanding officer Dave Fravor told Intelligencer. The missing audio, he says, “just didn’t make the copy that was taken from the storage drive.”A former fighter pilot who served on the Nimitz in 2004, who spoke to Intelligencer on condition of anonymity, recalled an exhilarating group screening of the FLIR1 video inside the Nimitz’s Carrier Vehicle Intelligence Center (CVIC): “Debriefs were usually pro forma in the CVIC, but this one in particular was so odd,” the former pilot said. “There weren’t really a lot of skeptics in that room.” Years later, Fravor told ABC News that he didn’t know what the Tic Tac was, but that “it was really impressive, really fast, and I would like to fly it.” In the CVIC that day, the anonymous pilot told Intelligencer, “We all had that. We all wanted to fly it.”Fravor, Underwood and Slaight are not the only pilots to see unidentified objects that behaved in ways that have defied the laws of physics. The news magazine 60 Minutes included additional details about the 2004 incident and the Pentagon’s investigation of UAPs. Wired produced a report that analyzes the behavior of objects captured by military pilots. The speeds at which these objects travel, the lack of visible propulsion, their ability to go from the air into the ocean and back again…all these things have left experts baffled. So, could this be a secret U.S. military project? A former government official with very high clearance told 60 Minutes that it is highly unlikely. Others in the videos doubt it, as well. Could it be a Chinese or Russian vehicle? It’s possible. But, it would be a massive leap in technology to produce a vehicle that could behave in such a manner.On orders from Congress, the Pentagon released a preliminary analysis on its investigation of unidentified aerial phenomena in June 2021. It was disappointing for anyone who was expecting a definitive answer. (Report: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena — Unclassified)In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis. There are probably multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations based on the range of appearances and behaviors described in the available reporting. Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall “other” bin. UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security. Safety concerns primarily center on aviators contending with an increasingly cluttered air domain. UAP would also represent a national security challenge if they are foreign adversary collection platforms or provide evidence a potential adversary has developed either a breakthrough or disruptive technology.In essence, these things could be anything. We don’t really know. They’re definitely a threat, at least to aviation. How much of a threat? We don’t know. As for what falls into the “Other” category…well, you get the picture.Other: Although most of the UAP described in our dataset probably remain unidentified due to limited data or challenges to collection processing or analysis, we may require additional scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them. We would group such objects in this category pending scientific advances that allowed us to better understand them. The UAPTF intends to focus additional analysis on the small number of cases where a UAP appeared to display unusual flight characteristics or signature management.The Pentagon also released a redacted version of the classified preliminary assessment earlier this year due to a request from John Greenewald, who runs The Black Vault website that is repository for documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. Given the number of redactions, the document is not all that revealing. (Report: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena — Classified)The one word everyone avoids saying is alien; the word isn’t in the reports. There is a section on the “sociocultural stigmas” attached to even reporting that you’ve seen an UAP.Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military and IC describe disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or attempting to discuss it with colleagues. Although the effects of these stigmas have lessened as senior members of the scientific, policy, military, and intelligence communities engage on the topic seriously in public, reputational risk may keep many observers silent, complicating scientific pursuit of the topic.Some people are willing to be candid privately, albeit without attribution. A highly-reliable source with knowledgeable about the investigations into UAPs told the author that objects like the ones recorded by the military pilots are believed to automated probes of alien origin. Analysts don’t believe they are of foreign origin. The objects have been tracked in the atmosphere and in Earth orbit, said the source, who insisted on anonymity.A lot of people will be skeptical of such a claim. Retired computer programmer Mick West has been on a mission to prove that the latest UAP craze is little more than a “flap” based on flawed analysis that will soon fade away. Marik von Rennenkampff, a former analyst with the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, wrote about West’s skepticism in The Hill. (Story: The world’s most passionate UFO skeptic versus the government)Based on what is publicly known about these phenomena, skeptics like West believe that merely speculating about otherworldly explanations – as two former presidents and high-level intelligence officials recently have – is unwarranted. Unsurprisingly, Mick is also dismissive of explosive reports that the U.S. government is actively considering an extraterrestrial hypothesis for the most puzzling phenomena….In an e-mail exchange, I quizzed Mick about Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and former CIA director John Brennan’s recent speculation about extraterrestrial life.In my message to Mick, I noted that it is highly unlikely that former presidents – who still receive the intelligence community’s most robust analyses – would muse so openly about aliens simply on a whim. Surely, they asked what the government makes of these phenomena before speculating about otherworldly life.In his response, which Mick gave me permission to share for this column, West dismisses Obama, Clinton and Brennan’s comments as “low information cryptic statements from non-experts.” More importantly, Mick suspects that such extraordinary theorizing is based on flawed analysis.The Congressional hearing on Tuesday may not provide much additional information about UAPs. It will be interesting to see if any of the legislators will directly ask the two witnesses whether the objects are of alien origin. If they don’t do so with the cameras on, they will have the opportunity to do so during a closed session that will follow the public hearing. 60 Minutes, aliens, Chad Underwood, David Fravor, Department of Defense, DOD, flying saucers, FOIA, Freedom of Information Act, House Counterterrorism Counterintelligence and Counterproliferation Subcommittee, House Intelligence Committee, House Select Committee on Intelligence, Jim Slaight, John Greenewald, Marik von Rennenkampff, Mick West, Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, Roswell Incident, Roswell NM, The Black Vault, U.S. Navy, UAPs, UFOs, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, unidentified flying objects, USS Nimitz, USS Princeton, Wired magazinePost navigationULA Names Chris Ellerhorst Vice President, Kuiper ProgramWhat You Need to Know about NASA’s Boeing Orbital Flight Test-2 PollsIf you had the money, which suborbital spacecraft would you fly on? Blue Origin's New Shepard Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwoView Results Loading ...Polls ArchiveRecent Posts Report: SpaceX Raising Another $750 Million Space SPAC Index: Falcon 9 Launches 47 Payloads for SPAC Companies on Rideshare Mission SpaceX to Kick off 2023 Launch Campaign with Transporter Rideshare Mission on Tuesday Europe, India and Japan Faced Launch Delays & Setbacks in 2022 SpaceX and CASC Close Out Record Launch Year The Best Laid Plans of Mice and Dmitrys: Russian Space Industry Ends 2022 in Isolation U.S. & China Dominated Launch Industry in 2022, Russia Finishes a Distant Third Russia’s 2022 Launch Total Reduced by Ruptured Relations with West Over Ukraine This Week on The Space Show Space Biz Roundup: Recent Raises, Contracts & Partnerships Space SPAC Index: Richard Branson and Virgin Galactic Back in News as Stock Hits All-Time Low; Astra, Spire, Momentus and BigBear Crash Below $1 Four Launches to End Record Year as Europe Picks Up Pieces After Vega-C Failure Who Launched What on SpaceX’s Five Transporter Missions Move Over Cornwall, Here Comes Spaceport Esrange NASA Awards Launch Services Contract to SpaceX for Sentinel-6B Mission Virgin Orbit Obtains Licenses as First Launch From Cornwall Slips into 2023 Vega-C Launch Failure Ends Frustrating Year for Europe Virgin Group Puts Another $20 Million into Struggling Virgin Orbit Space SPAC Index: Arqit Abandons Satellite Plans, Astra Space Faces Lawsuit, Planet Labs Earnings, AST SpaceMobile Agreement with NASA, Satellogic Business Update Satellogic Provides Business UpdateBlogrollAmericaSpaceAviation WeekFlorida TodayNASASpaceflight.comSpace NewsSpace.comSpacetoday.netArchives Archives Select Month January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: matata by valerio. ShareThis Copy and Paste