groundbreaking jurisprudence? …or talmudic vengeance? Were the trials just? …Were the witnesses honest? Were the confessions coerced under torture? Were the executions botched? Were the Allies guilty of crimes against humanity? Does the Nuremberg Code apply to Jews today?
Nuremberg Judaism Powered by Translate Home donations Antisemitism expulsions necessity of antisemitism Torah Jesus in the Talmud the Holy Trinity forgiveness Covenants the Church on the Jews Mystery of the Jewish People Who is human? abortion Jews and Blacks Perpetrators Goy Guide to World History How they do it disarming goyim Chabad the lobby banksters Rothschilds Swindlers list assassins hate pimps Epstein Mossad Jew media metastases kosher internet aftermath shapeshifters marranos donmeh kosher racket Muslims burning churches goy accomplices Catholic action Genocide World Wars Ritual Murder Israelis target children organ harvesting 1948 Big Lies Torah encourages lies Jesus was a Jew Hebrew Bible Kol Nidre Noahide deceit synagogue and state holocaust Nuremberg Judeo-Christian the Romans did it land without a people save any life false flags name calling high IQ Perversion pedophilia and sodomy Torah on women Torah on trannies potty voyeurs sicko sages Paganism kabbalah transmigration Resources documentaries ethical vaccines sacred art memes funny videos cosmology theological certainty levels of sin dispositions for a good death fallacies archive raw data Usury Pharisees Mary marks of the Church sola scriptura once saved private interpretation do this idols purgatory Christian Zionism call no man father asleep Sunday worship Inquisition phony victims Christmas slavery blushing Marxists New Order of Pharisees Jorge Opus Dei dishonorable mentions News jew flu SSPX third temple Putin Trump Kushner get the memo Soros self-reflection China Japan Italy France Iceland Hungary Poland Ireland Britain Antarctica two Lucys search big lies • Nuremberg groundbreaking jurisprudence?… or talmudic vengeance? Nuremberg 1493 Nuremberg 1945 Nuremberg 1946 Nuremberg 1946 Purim Regarding the spectators with contempt he sarcastically announced the whole truth about Nuremberg: “It is the Feast of Purim of 1946!” Julius Streicher as a defendant before the International Military Tribunal. (photo of November 24, 1945). He was executed for being the editor of a magazine, Der Stürmer. clockwise from top right: Streicher, Jodl, Sauckel, Frick, Ribbentrop Were the trials just? …or only vengeance? Were the witnesses honest? Were the confessions coerced under torture? Were the executions botched? Were the Allies guilty of crimes against humanity? Does the Nuremberg Code apply to Jews today? were the trials just? Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 1 Charter of the International Military Tribunal https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp Article 19 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art19 Article 21 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art21 The Injustice of the Nuremberg Trials by Mark Weber https://www.bitchute.com/video/sN11hiPHZKG7/ https://altcensored.com/watch?v=ML0xYYKgPgw The Nuremberg Tribunal of 1945-46 — the most spectacular judicial enterprise in history — was meant to prove that the defeated German regime had been one of unique and monstrous deceit, rapaciousness and evil. But in fact the Tribunal dispensed not justice, but injustice. The four Allied powers that organized and ran it were themselves guilty of many of the crimes they accused the German defendants of having committed. The Tribunal operated on the basis of “ex post facto” law created after the fact expressly for the occasion, and which the Allies applied only to the defeated. The hangings of German leaders ordered by the Tribunal were little more than murders glossed over with a veneer of makeshift, hypocritical pseudo-legality. This 50-minute video received more than 100,000 “views” on YouTube before it was “restricted” in 2017, and then banned altogether. …or only vengeance? 75-80% of the trial staff was Jewish Does the surname Bernays ring a bell? the nexus of agitprop, Nuremberg, and Netflix Murray Bernays took the name of his wife, Hella Bernays who was Edward Bernays’ sister. Edward Bernays wasn’t a mere ‘public relations man.’ He literally wrote the book on propaganda (called...Propaganda) capitalizing on his uncle's ‘psychiatric” views. Important to us today, Ed Bernays’ grand-nephew is Marc Bernays Randolph, the founder of Netflix. https://www.geni.com/people/Maurice-Cohen-Bernays/6000000003186112419 The Jewish-Soviet Nuremberg mastermind This is a cropped version (original) of a photograph originating from the personal album of Robert "Justice" Jackson, the chief U.S. prosecutor at the trial of the major war criminals in Nuremberg. The photograph shows the Russian delegation at the London Conference in the summer of 1945, at which the charter to be used at the forthcoming Nuremberg trial was written. The gentleman on the left of the photograph is Ion Timofeevich Nikitchenko, a veteran of the Moscow show trials and the main Soviet judge at Nuremberg; the young man on the right is Oleg Tryanovsley, present as a translator but a future diplomat (his mother was the Jewish bolshevik Elena Rozmirovich), and the gentleman in the centre is Prof. Aron Naumowitsch Trainin, the Soviet legal genius of whom Holocaust Controversies' Dr. Nicholas Terry wrote: “the legal architecture for the trial was strongly influenced by the Soviets - many of the key ideas came from their chief international legal expert, Aron Trainin, whose prewar and wartime writings were translated into English and cited by the likes of Murray Bernays (also Jewish) in the planning stage. Maxwell Fyfe regarded Trainin's briefs as a ‘godsend’ because they helped clarify the issues the various lawyers faced in organising the trial.” The 1995 Jewish Encyclopedia of Russia states that Trainin was Jewish. He was also a member of the Extraordinary State Commission, and was a signatory to USSR-63; a lengthy report on alleged German atrocities in south-west Soviet Union, including the gassing of 900 Red Army soldiers in the catacombs of the Adzhimushkay quarry in the Crimea. A few days after Trainin would have arrived in London for the conference, a translation of an article he'd written for the Red Army newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda was published by the Soviet embassy in Washington D.C. within which he wrote: “Before a world already aware of the horrors of the wholesale annihilation of people in Smolensk and Maidanek, new sinister pages have opened—Tremblyanka and Oswiecim, Buchenwal and Belsen: trains methodically and regularly supplying living human raw material for destruction; three million victims done to death in Tremblyanka; four million victims annihilated in Oswiecim.” “Justice Shall be Done” by Prof. A Trainin, June 1945 Special Supplement, p.25, of the Information Bulletin, published by the Embassy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Washington D.C., June 30, 1945, 1944. enlarged testimony of the late US Senator Thomas Dodd (D-CT) • 75% Jewish and by Louis Marschalko’s count • 80% Jewish The World Conquerors Chapter 10, New Purim and Nuremberg by Louis Marschalko, 1958 https://educate-yourself.org/cn/worldconquerorchapter10.shtml https://web.archive.org/web/20170421000052/https://educate-yourself.org/cn/worldconquerorchapter10.shtml an OCR scan: http://432thedrop.com/NewDrop/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/MARSCHALKOLouis-The_World_Conquerors_1958-OCR.pdf download the entire book here New Purim and Nuremberg WHO knows about those ancient teachings on which the Jewish doctrine of revenge is based? Who knows the real meaning of the Feast of Purim? Who has seen this feast? Who has seen the Jews getting drunk in their synagogues? For, although they are at other times often teetotalers, on this day their religious duly is to get inebriated. Who, among all the "Bible-reading" Gentiles knows that Purim is celebrated by Jewry to this very day as a feast of rejoicing to commemorate one of the greatest mass-murders in the history of the world? Nearly 2,500 years have passed since the first Purim, but the descendants of Mordecai and Esther still bake their cakes decorated with the lion of Judah. The male members of the Jewish community still become drunk on the fourteenth day of the month Adar, remaining in an ecstasy promoted by a sense of revenge. And when in the synagogues the book of Queen Esther is read, Haman-sticks are taken out of caftan pockets; for orthodox Jews must symbolically strike them on the synagogue bench whenever the name of King Ahasuerus's chief minister is read out in the text. In the synagogues of the East also, drunken Jews who have consumed unlimited quantities of wines and spirits are seen reeling about on this day. In Belz and Sadagora, Palestinian dancing girls perform their lustful eastern dances. This feast is to be enjoyed; it is to celebrate a mass murder and a great revenge. Let us see what the Jews are taught in the Book of Esther. What happened at the first Purim? The Book tells us that *Ahasuerus, the Persian King, fell out with his wife, who was also a lady of Persian descent, and decided to find himself another. The new Queen whom he chose happened to belong to the Jewish community which had been carried into captivity by Nebuchadnezzar. But Esther did not disclose either her origin or her nationality to the King and the royal household. (129) Mordecai, her uncle, forbade this. Thus Mordecai laid the foundation stone of a new political school. He marked out for future generations the policy of having Jewish women selected for the royal chamber and thus influencing kings, emperors, presidents and other statesmen, in order to achieve at a high level the aspirations of Jewish nationalism. Though these Jewish women repudiated the Mosaic commandment, nevertheless they furthered the cause of their nation. At this time Haman, son of Hammedatha the Agagite, was advanced by King Ahasuerus to the highest office, to the post of prime minister of the Empire. The reason is not recorded in the Bible, but Haman was the "enemy of the Jews" and accused them before the king as follows: "…There is a certain people scattered abroad and dispersed among the people in all the provinces of thy kingdom: and their laws are diverse from all people; neither keep they the king's laws..." (Esther iii. 8.) According to the Book of Esther, the King ordered in his edict that on the thirteenth day of the month Adar the Jews must be killed. But old Mordecai learned of the king's plan and sent a message to his niece to go to the king and "make supplication unto him, and make request before him for her people". Thereupon the queen invited the king and Haman to a banquet. "And the king said again unto Esther on the second day at the banquet of wine, 'What is thy petition, Queen Esther? and it shall be granted thee: and what is thy request? and it shall be performed, even to the half of the kingdom.'" (Esther vii. 2.) It is clear from the Book of Esther that by the time the queen began to accuse Haman, the "hater", the king was under the influence of wine. Ahasuerus in a rage left the banquet and went out into the palace gardens to cool himself; meanwhile Haman began to beg the queen for his life. The application of the Nuremberg methods can here be clearly recognised; lies and slander! When Ahasuerus returned, the queen accused Haman of attempting to rape her while the king was out. Thereupon the king ordered that Haman be immediately hanged. The taking over of power was achieved before the prime minister's body was cold. (130) * One of several Mede and Persian kings mentioned in The Old Testament, specifically in the Book of Esther, generally identified with Xerxes. Xerxes (circa 519-465 B.C.) king of Persia was the son of the first Darius. On the order of the beautiful Jewess the king promoted Mordecai to the post of prime minister and simultaneously bloody massacres broke loose from India to Ethiopia, perpetrated by Jews who had actually suffered no harm whatever. After all, Haman's plan remained a plan only, never being carried out, and Haman, the person responsible, was hanged. Then, as always, whenever power fell into Jewish hands, they celebrated their victory by bloody massacres. The husband of the Jewish queen, the ancient symbol of the puppet statesman, graciously permitted the Jews "to take revenge on their enemies". Since the first Purim, Mosaic nationalism has consistently bathed in the blood of victims slain in achieving perpetual revenge. "The Jews had light, and gladness, and joy and honour!" (Esther viii. 16), says The Old Testament. The Book of Esther gives a detailed account of the victims of this mass slaughter who were executed with exceptional savagery. It recounts that all the ten sons of Haman were killed, whose only sin was that their father was an "anti-Semite". In the city of Shushan the Jews first killedmen, then slaughtered another 300 and finally in the provinces "... slew of their foes seventy and five thousand..." (Esther ix. 16) without any plausible reason. To be able to assess the magnitude of these massacres correctly, we must not consider these figures in relation to the present-day population of the earth. The armies of Alexander the Great which conquered India consisted only of 47,000 men. The total strength of the Persian army at Marathon was 5,000, and Hannibal fought the Battle of Cannae with 20,000 soldiers. Therefore the figure of 75,000 massacred Persians was statistically an exceedingly high number. All this happened "on the thirteenth day of the month Adar; and on the fourteenth day of the same rested they; and made it a day of feasting and gladness." (Esther ix. 17.) "Because Haman, the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, the enemy of all the Jews, had devised against the Jews to destroy them and had cast Pur, that is, the lot, to consume them, and to destroy them." (Esther ix. 24.) "But when Esther came before the king he commanded by letters that his wicked device, which he devised against the Jews, (131) should return upon his own head, and that he and his sons should be hanged on the gallows." (Esther ix. 25.) "Wherefore they called these days Purim after the name of Pur. Therefore for all the words of this letter, and of that which they had seen concerning this matter, and which had come unto them." (Esther ix. 26.) "The Jews ordained, and look upon them, and upon their seed and upon all such as joined themselves unto them, so as it should not fail, that they would keep these two days according to their writing, and according to their appointed time every year." (Esther ix. 27.) "And that these days should be remembered and kept throughout every generation, every family, every province and every city; and that these days of Purim should not fail from among the Jews, nor the memorial of them perish from their seed." (Esther ix. 28.) No nation has ever kept a pledge better than the Jews have kept the Feast of Purim for more than twenty-four centuries. Year after year they have celebrated the anniversary of the revenge and massacres. The frenzy induced by blood and wine and the triumphal exultation of satisfied revenge soared from city to city and from village to village. In the small thatched village synagogue, as well as in the impressive domed metropolitan temple, Purim became both a religious and national feast day. The writer of these pages, when in a provincial town in Hungary, happened to witness the caftan-clad troops reeling out of the synagogue in fours. It was the Feast of Purim. Passers-by commented casually: "Hello, the Jews are having their holidays." This same eternal hatred burns behind the teachings of Marx and of the Illuminati. It has turned Marxist Socialism into a creed of hatred. The apostles of this hatred have stood in the background of revolutions and Communist uprisings; they came to power with Bolshevism. Perhaps one day the history of the modern Hamans will be published ~ the story of those politicians, clergymen, statesmen, writers and journalists who were bold enough to see in the hatred demonstrated during Purim, a threat to the Christian world ~ and an account written of how they were persecuted, how their families were (132) ruined and how their children were plunged into destitution, and lastly, how "the haters" were hanged. Jewry's greatest holiday is Purim: the feast of hatred. The greatest holiday of Christianity is the birth of Christ ~ the birth of love. At Nuremberg, Purim was dressed in the robes of legality. Revenge was wrapped up in legal paragraphs. A brand new "legal title" was created for the purpose of carrying out mass slaughters, whilst the real aim behind it was far more ambitious and sinister. Christian and Roman law and, generally speaking, Law itself, was to be nullified. The aim was to humiliate the vanquished nations, to intimidate the minds of the people, and through the "new law" to secure the political possibility of attaining total and complete world rule. Was thefarcical procedure to furnish "war criminals" at Nuremberg an example of democracy in action? Was there really an unbiased court under theUnited States of America, Great Britain, France and SovietRussia, or was the procedure nothing but the sword of Jehovah smiting a defeated people? Were the "new laws", i.e. the basis for theverdicts, Christian in character? Did justice or revenge prevail? The Nuremberg verdicts were pronounced to punish crimes committed against humanity. But on the bench sat the mass murderers of Katyn together with those responsible for the bombing of Dresden. The war propaganda of the allies always protested with extreme vigour against the principle of collective guilt. Nevertheless this principle of collective guilt was sanctioned by the Nuremberg tribunals when the ignominious theory of "guilty organisations" was invented. The radio networks everywhere lectured frequently at this time about "the law", yet at Nuremberg one of the most important legal principles was thrown aside, i.e. that no one can sit in judgment on his own case. American and Soviet flags were displayed together on the tribunal, but the most basic legal principle of the American constitution and judicature was ignored, i.e. Nulla Poena Sine Lege, which means that no one can be convicted for acts which were not punishable by law when committed. In the courtroom sentences were pronounced against barbarism, while concurrently in the basements of the court buildings the Prison Guards of Robert Kempner, the Public Prosecutor, brutally tortured prisoners. The principle of fair play was observed formally only, as the sentences (133) were based on incriminating or forged documents. Any crimes committed against humanity in the concentration camps should have been brought under the jurisdiction of an international court consisting of judges delegated by neutrals, and under conditions in which the court could judge not only the barbaric acts committed by the defeated parties but also those committed by the victorious states. Had this happened, the real criminals could never have obliterated the black stigma branded on them. But by adopting Jewish revenge methods, martyrs were made of certain guilty persons who in any case would never have been acquitted by an impartial court. In the tribunal at Nuremberg, American, Russian, French and British judges sat, but a single victorious power prosecuted and judged: Judah! Now we know what actually took place behind the scenes. Robert M. Kempner, a Jew of course, and formerly an "oberregierungsrat" in Germany, had been wor… truncated (64,233 more characters in archive)