TextSearch

Naming the enemy: Globalist American Empire vs Zionist Occupied Government vs New World Order

Around 2020, people began to use the term “Globalist American Empire” (GAE) — which was popularized by Darren J. Beattie of Revolver News — in place of terms like “Zio…

· archived 5/18/2026, 12:43:46 AMscreenshotcached html
Naming the enemy: Globalist American Empire vs Zionist Occupied Government vs New World Order – Thuletide Skip to content Search for: Search Thuletide Posts About Debunking Race Denialism OPSEC (Stay Anon) Resources and Downloads Blog Feedback Comment Box [For Requests, Suggestions, Complaints, etc.] Race Science Infographics Archive New World Order, Opinion, Politics, Uncategorized Naming the enemy: Globalist American Empire vs Zionist Occupied Government vs New World Order Date: February 26, 2022Author: thuletide 34 Comments Around 2020, people began to use the term “Globalist American Empire” (GAE) — which was popularized by Darren J. Beattie of Revolver News — in place of terms like “Zionist Occupied Government” (ZOG, with “Zionist” being an obtuse way of saying “Jewish Nationalist”). Understandably, some nationalists may prefer the term GAE over ZOG, especially for optics purposes, since the latter can carry skinhead connotations due to its explicit anti-Semitism. Being politically associated with people who look like this is not strategically advantageous, to say the least: It’s the Right-Wing equivalent of Leftists trying to win over the proletariat while looking and behaving like this: The problem is that “optics friendly” alternatives to “ZOG” have existed for a long, long time. See, for example, Globalism / Globalists, the New World Order, or GloboHomo (Globalism + Homosexuality / Homogenization). The flaws of using “Globalist American Empire” may not be immediately obvious to some, but they become crystal clear when analyzing each term side-by-side: Globalism: Globalism, in general, is the problem. GloboHomo: Globalism that spreads LGBT ideology (Western Globalism) is the problem. Zionist Occupied Government: Zionist Jews are the problem. New World Order: A cabal of world-government-building internationalists are the problem. Globalist American Empire: America is the problem and it has an empire that happens to be globalist in scope. Globalism and Globalists are valid terms, even if they are a little broad. GloboHomo is an apt descriptor for Western Globalism but cannot be applied to Eastern Globalism (yet), and is thus too narrow. The world government project can easily be advanced without the promotion of LGBT ideology (which is primarily a method of societal destabilization), as it was for decades or even centuries in the West. ZOG is certainly an oversimplification. Many Globalists were/are not Jewish and many Jewish globalists were/are not Zionists (at least, not openly so). Furthermore, many governments involved with the Globalist project are not occupied by Jews or Zionists. Heavily influenced? Yes. Occupied? No. However, the term at least identifies a major aspect of Globalism: The entire project is centered around Jewish ethnic interests, eschatology, religious and occult beliefs. The Globalist triumph over “regressive” and “antiquated” nationalism, epitomized by the Nazis, is the founding myth of postwar society. It defines ultimate good and evil, from which we derive all societal values, and that which is held sacred and unchallengeable. Not to mention that Jews are undeniably overrepresented in positions of power on a global scale. They could easily be described as the ringleaders of Globalism. The term “New World Order” was coined by Globalists themselves specifically to describe their one-world government project. It has been used for centuries by people such as Karl Marx, H. G. Wells, Henry Kissinger, and even Tony Blair. It refers to their overthrowing of the “old world order” — which is exemplified by private property, hierarchy and order (mischaracterized as “oppression”), homogeneous nation-states, traditional cultures, traditional family units, and so on — and the creation of a new global system in its place: A world-spanning technocracy with monopolistic control over production, banking, communication, transportation, etc., combined with the total abolition of family, nation, race, and private property. This project has been discussed openly for centuries. For more information on the New World Order and how it relates to COVID, the Great Reset, transhumanism, etc., see my recent article on the subject. “Globalist American Empire” stands out from all of the other terms as a blatantly intentional mischaracterization. Not only does “GAE” absolve all of the other countries that are complicit in the New World Order, such as Russia and China, but by blaming one single country, it conveniently masks the true driving force behind the New World Order, which is a rootless, international conspiracy and a vast network of think tanks, NGOs, etc. “GAE” shields all of the usual suspects from criticism: The United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations, NATO, the World Economic Forum, Soros, Kissinger, Schwab, bankers like BlackRock and the Rothschilds, Socialists / Communists / Leftists, the handful of megacorporations that own every major industry on the planet, and so on. By painting America as the ultimate evil, everything that America historically represents also becomes evil, regardless of whether not these things are supported or propagated by the New World Order: Anglo-American cultural values, Liberty, Freedom, Capitalism, and even White Americans themselves. By the same logic, anything that harms or opposes America is viewed as good and righteous. This leads people to praise hostile foreign nations, various forms of oriental despotism, and to delusionally claim that countries like China, which is the New World Order’s technocratic petri dish, will end Globalism, simply because they are geopolitically opposed to America. This anti-American rhetoric is utilized not only by anti-White Leftists but also by ostensibly pro-White “Third Positionists” (Socialists), who claim that Globalism is exclusively a product of “Anglo-American Neo-Liberal Capitalist Hegemony.” In reality, Americans are a victim of this Globalist conspiracy, which has brought their homeland to the verge of total collapse. “GAE” blames the vassals for the crimes of their masters. Darren J. Beattie, who popularized the term GAE, is, in his own words, a “Proud Jew” and “pro-Israel,” meaning that he is a Zionist. It’s clear why he is opposed to a term like “ZOG,” which implicates him and his co-ethnics, regardless of how true the accusation may be. Beattie does good work with the Revolver News website and is generally Right-Wing, but when the rubber meets the road, 99% of people will always put their own kin above superficial political allegiances. To conclude: We live in an age of information warfare and Fourth Generation Warfare; words matter and framing is incredibly important. Globalism is a global problem and New World Order means New WORLD Order, not “Anglo-American Neo-Liberal Capitalist Hegemony.” Share this:TwitterFacebookLike Loading... Related “White Nationalism is Terrorism:” Addressing Zionist Hypocrisy and the 2019 Congressional Hearing on White NationalismSeptember 30, 2020In "Politics"Nationalism 101: What is a “Nation”? (Nation vs State vs Country and why “Civic Nationalism” is just Globalism)January 12, 2021In "History"On Accelerationism: Why Praying for “the Collapse” is an Escapist FantasyApril 23, 2021In "Politics" Post navigation Previous Previous post: Alt-Right and Identitarian links to Aleksandr Dugin [TL;DR version]Next Next post: Non-White immigration was banned throughout the Anglosphere before the Second World War [Replacement Migration, laws, etc.] 34 thoughts on “Naming the enemy: Globalist American Empire vs Zionist Occupied Government vs New World Order” Add Comment Cheese says: February 26, 2022 at 8:49 pm A lot of people vent their hatred of Whites by masking it behind anti-GloboHomo sentiment, I noticed this with Muslims last year during the Taliban takeover. I think it will be quite hard for Jews to subvert China though. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply Searching for Fernando says: February 26, 2022 at 10:37 pm Jews have been pulling the strings in China for at least a couple of hundred years…probably longer. There is plenty of info about this online, if one cares to search. Jews funded the communist revolutions in both Russia AND China. The Rockefeller Foundation was directly behind China’s one-child policy. Why on earth would people who considered huge families extremely good fortune, surrender to that policy…if it did not come from the eternal meddlers? About 25 years ago, I was in a Chinese herb shop, and I struck up a conversation with the wizened old propietor. He mentioned Jews in China. Not being as educated in the subject back then, I blurted out: “There are Jews in China?!!!” His reply: “Too many!!!” LikeLiked by 5 people Reply Searching for Fernando says: February 26, 2022 at 10:39 pm That should read: proprietor LikeLike tgmon says: March 7, 2022 at 4:48 am But they did it already. You’re right it was hard. That’s why it took lots of deaths, famines and persecution of different groups including the Han. I’m not saying there were no famines before that, but CP in China was not an improvement either but a reconfiguration and reinvention of China as the Eastern chapter of NWO. LikeLike Reply donaldsub4u says: February 26, 2022 at 9:16 pm To me as I look at the current world around me I see Oligarks as the enemy. The power structure is white! What is gaining is black power and it seems to be more fair. The worls seems to be in a mess and blacks seem to be more on the side of peace and liberty. I see the black new world order as an alternative. We need to give that a chance to grow and develop LikeLiked by 1 person Reply thuletide says: February 26, 2022 at 10:25 pm are you on drugs? LikeLiked by 4 people Reply Gorgutz says: February 27, 2022 at 11:54 am ^ This guy posts on cuck and african blogs I have seen it from googling his username. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply Theone says: February 27, 2022 at 3:36 pm Blacks on the side of Peace and liberty HAHAHHAHAHA LikeLiked by 1 person Reply joseph says: February 28, 2022 at 11:11 pm yeah im sure the blacks are more capable of governing things than the white that built modern civilization just as they have proven in haiti, rhodesia and south africa, stop waching blacked dude, it does this shit to your brain LikeLiked by 2 people Reply RYGB22 (@RYGB22) says: February 27, 2022 at 12:11 am Your posts are always well-written and concise. A voice like yours, which can decipher and makes these topics easier to understand without all the fancy verbose bullshit is seriously appreciated and I hope you don’t stop. There are too many pseudo-intellectuals and general weirdos on the “Dissident Right” that seem to overanalyze and overcomplicate things. LikeLiked by 3 people Reply thuletide says: February 27, 2022 at 3:00 pm TY, appreciated. yes, too many bloviators who are more interested in sounding smart than being right “Whoever knows he is deep tries to be clear, but whoever wants to seem deep to the crowd tries to be obscure. For the crowd supposes that anything it cannot see to the bottom must be deep: it is so timid and goes so unwillingly into the water.” LikeLiked by 3 people Reply poop says: February 27, 2022 at 4:05 am I would like to ask you why you are so convinced that China is within the grip of the globalists. I am not pro-China but I am not entirely convinced they are under globalist control presently. It is true that those people were present in China during the communist revolution, and indeed the communist revolution in China was very intent on culturally destroying the country as happened in Russia. However many aspects of Chinese culture have been slowly restored since around the 1970s or 1980s, and as far as I can tell, there is little to no immigration to China from anywhere, we see them take actions such as banning video games, effeminate men in media, etc. What’s more is Soros recently called their leader the greatest threat to an open society in the world. To me, this suggests Soros, being an old man who simply believes the world belongs to him at this point, sees China’s leader as his foe who will not co-operate with his interests, and thus will act to oust him. Do you believe this is all or mostly theater? I am very interested in your thoughts. LikeLike Reply thuletide says: February 27, 2022 at 12:03 pm For many reasons covered in these telegram posts : https://t.me/thuletide/2331 https://t.me/MorgothsReview/2338 https://t.me/thuletide/2270 https://t.me/thuletide/2242 China is not literally *occupied*, as the West is, but it is 100% on board with the NWO agenda and is the prototype NWO technocracy LikeLiked by 4 people Reply hello says: March 4, 2022 at 3:40 am Thule, you’ll find this interesting: https://wrenchinthegears.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Melanie-Swan-Quantum-Blockchain-Slideshare-November-2021.pdf LikeLike hello says: March 4, 2022 at 3:43 am Page 87 on is particularly interesting! LikeLike petersson says: February 27, 2022 at 8:14 am You should make a thread entirely on the whole Ukraine-Russia thing. LikeLiked by 3 people Reply Nicholas R. Jeelvy says: February 27, 2022 at 8:50 am If we understand globohomo to also mean globally-homogenizing, which is the original meaning, then this applies to the Peking and Moscow regimes as well. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply agariol says: February 27, 2022 at 3:07 pm You should talk about the TradCath question in a post at some point. There are a lot of anglophobia and anglo hate, among tradcath circles, it’s important to notice there were based anglo tradcaths like Chesterton and Tolkien, but today, many anglo tradcaths hate their own roots, even an intelligent person as E.Michael Jones has some contempt toward anglo culture and anglo imperialism. We should see, many people promoting this tradcath anglophobic agenda are racemixed people from Latin America and some spaniards, due to an ideology called “Hispanismo” which is gaining popularity among rightwing circles in the hispanic world and is a threat toward white people in North America in a similar way Duginist eurasianism and islamism are threats toward white people in Europe. Hispanismo has some similarities with duginism, they promote a racemixed imperialism based in Spain, the same way duginists promote a racemixed imperialism based in Rusia. Both hate the anglo world and anglo cultural heritage, they promote a racemixed identity based in Catholic religion and spanish language, the same way duginists promote that with russian language and orthodox faith. Both ideologies are enemies of the race concept, regarding it as an anglo creation, despite having their base in two racist empires who fought against mongols and moors and conquered many non-white people’s in Asia and America. Hispanismo has the potential to subvert white people in Spain and some white communities in Argentina and Uruguay, the same way duginism is doing that with slavic people’s. Hispanismo is not a minor concern, due to it’s importance in spaniard Right-wing politics, like Vox party, and the growing trend of that ideology in the USA, among conservative circles who label latinos as based and trad, while they have high crime rates, high obesity rates, alcoholism, drogadiction, cartels, prostitution, incest, hatred toward white people, and some irrendentist aspirations, like recreating the Spanish Empire in a mongrelized version or the Mexican Empire conquering Texas and California from anglos. LikeLiked by 2 people Reply Theone says: February 27, 2022 at 3:40 pm Or maybe they just want england and Muttsa gone,after all it was not dugin or hispanists or whatever back then in Normandy. LikeLike Reply How is it different? says: February 28, 2022 at 8:18 pm But why do the Duginites and Hispaniscists push much of the same rhetoric as the US political elite? Seems like they just want an American style empire in their own geographic region. Dugin’s whole thing just seems like he wants a reverse engineered US empire in the east with old USSR elements grafted on. The hispanicists seem to want Pan-Americanism minus “the republic of the north”/”WASPs” LikeLike Rob says: December 31, 2023 at 5:50 pm Hispanism which is nothing more than a secular Catholicism pro-miscegenation disguised as conservatism, miscegenation is one of the biggest mistakes that the Spanish empire made, when precisely we should have done the same as England by repopulating the American lands with European settlers as is as Carlos III did in Andalusia. South American countries have some of the highest crime rates in world, the Hispanic right and leftism are united that the biological differences between a white Spaniard and a South American mestizo can be bridged simply by both speaking Spanish and being Catholic, but forget that South American countries have very high crime rates and their IQ is lower than that of a white person, and that South Americans who live in Spain live mainly on social assistance and that creates the false perception that they can be assimilated (although in Madrid quantitatively the most dangerous neighborhoods are precisely those with the largest South American population) the moment the government withdraws this aid as the current pension system is unviable, Spain will become South America 2.0 on a social and economic level overnight. LikeLike George says: February 28, 2022 at 5:29 am Do you have plans to write an article on the Ukraine-Russia situation? I’ve been following you for a long time and always appreciated your perspective, and your telegram posts have been a reminder that Russia is no great friend and to be rightfully wary of Duginists. At the same time I’d hope to be able to ask questions about the recent NATO buildup and what that means for nationalists inside Europe and North America, though an article specific to that might be the more appropriate place to ask (assuming such an article doesn’t preempt my questions in the first place). LikeLiked by 1 person Reply thuletide says: February 28, 2022 at 11:07 am Need more time and information to see the bigger picture tbh. I don’t want to join the clueless pundits talking out their asses so I don’t come out with anything as stupid as “based Putin.” Generally, I think : 1. The globalist endgame is total world-government 2. Incrementally creating continental superstates and officially abolishing national governments would be the most effective step towards this. 3. This would be best achieved via a world war (WW1 resulted in League of Nations, WW2 resulted in LoN rebranding and expanding to United Nations) We know that le tribe openly occupies the entire west (including Ukraine) and we know that they dominate Russia and whisper into Putin’s ears. We know that Ukraine and Russia are both part of WEF gang and have embraced Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development technocracy. So, I can only conclude that they are intentionally setting up a geopolitical situation that will eventually lead to another world war. Plus, we also know that they are intentionally destroying the West so they can move their base of operations to the east, China and Rusisa. How does that factor into this war? Maybe something to do with energy supplies or the Belt and Road Initiative? LikeLiked by 4 people Reply stradioti says: March 1, 2022 at 3:11 am Putin got his WEF membership revoked i heard. he doesn’t appear in their website anymore LikeLike stradioti says: March 1, 2022 at 3:09 am i thank you for your clear views and for you exposing of oriental despotism, eastern globalism and “based” lefitsts to the intellectually naive and meme-ifed internet radical right, but i fear your americanism is getting the better of you. capitalism is a driving force of globalism. without capitalism the megacorps you hate so much would not have gotten where they are. anglo-american liberalism/rationalism is also a driving force of globalism. many of the useful idiots of Western Globalism are NPCs who blindly and gladly b

… truncated (8,650 more characters in archive)