“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” – Mark Twain “EARTH RISING” The very first photo humans saw of our common home from our closest orbiting p…
Moon Hoax Images | Aplanetruth.info Aplanetruth.info A Plane not A Planet Start Here First Questions Asked? Jesuits; Rulers of Evil History of Geocentric Theory The Heliocentric Globalist Theory Reasons to Doubt the Earth is Truly a Sphere Reasons to Doubt Everything NASA Moon Hoax Images Moon Hoax Videos Trusted FE Links Other Author Websites The F.E.S.S. Forum Flat Earth Videos Flat Earth Library Quotes Flat Earth Gallery I Flat Earth Gallery II FE Memes I FE Memes II FE Music Vids New! FE Maps Flat Earth Book Now On Sale! Moon Hoax Images Comments: 92 “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” – Mark Twain “EARTH RISING” The very first photo humans saw of our common home from our closest orbiting planet. This NASA created shot was impressed upon billions of minds at the time Apollo 8 is said to have taken this photo And reinforced hundreds, if not millions of times in global media. Van Gough, Rembrant, et al. would be ashamed of such amateurish art work, Still, billions believed, and still believe to this day, that this is a real photograph. ***** What do you really see above in the most famous picture in the World? Suspend belief for a few moments in your life. What do you just see in the above picture? Look at the “Blue Marble” as it is called. Incredible detail of the Earth, it’s clouds and even patches of green and brown, incredible details from 238,000 miles away. A perfect globe, even though it is said to be elliptical due to Moon’s gravitational pull, yet never seen. The deep blue ocean, which covers 2/3’rds of our Earth, is what we are told makes the sky so blue in our atmosphere. Why doesn’t the ocean blue overwhelm the photo from space void of atmosphere, like we see from NASA photos on other planets? The Moon’s horizon is level and flat right to left, yet due to the Moon being 1/4 the Earth in size and diameter, curvature should be seen easily across such a panoramic shot that was taken from returning from the dark side of the Moon. The picture of Earth is crystal clear, yet the Moon blurred and indistinct. With a high speed camera setting to get the Earth in such detail (the Earth has is spinning at 1,000 mph we are told!)…. the Moon should have detail as well, a you will see below in many, many other shots. And where are those dang billions and billions of stars, Carl, we all see in space from Earth at night? With no atmosphere on the Moon, and the stark, black background of space, they should be overwhelming every shot, yet nary a one. The Moon is so reflective of the Sun’s rays, we are told, that it lights up or Earth at night so brightly, from 238,000 miles away, that we can see easily see to walk around at night during a full moon. Yet Moon’s surface is shown to be a dull, dusty , least reflecting colors, brown and gray. Yet the Astronots were able to have no problems with such a direct, no atmosphere Sun with temperatures varying between + 250 and – 340 degrees. Thousands of pictures have been released from NASA, so examining the official narrative is relatively straightforward. Interestingly, nearly all pictures of Moon missions were not released until 1991 and after. Let’s chase some rabbits down the a real NASA hole. ***** My first words of my impression of being on the surface of the Moon that just came to my mind was “Magnificent desolation.” The magnificence of human beings, humanity, Planet Earth, maturing the technologies, imagination and courage to expand our capabilities beyond the next ocean, to dream about being on the Moon, and then taking advantage of increases in technology and carrying out that dream – achieving that is magnificent testimony to humanity. But it is also desolate – there is no place on earth as desolate as what I was viewing in those first moments on the Lunar Surface. Because I realized what I was looking at, towards the horizon and in every direction, had not changed in hundreds, thousands of years. Beyond me I could see the moon curving away – no atmosphere, black sky. Cold. Colder than anyone could experience on Earth when the sun is up- but when the sun is up for 14 days, it gets very, very hot. No sign of life whatsoever. That is desolate. More desolate than any place on Earth. ~ Buzz Aldrin, Apollo 11 and 2nd man to allegedly walk on the Moon. Moon temperatures make it Impossible to be on the Moon, much less truck around on Moonbuggies, touch hotter than hell moon rocks and set up sensor equipment. Yet everything, always worked great, we are told, even though man had never, ever experienced such temperatures on Earth. Radio communications, sensors, mobile devices, coolant systems, batteries, buggies, fuel, etc. no problem. Due to no atmosphere the temperatures range each day on the sunny side ranged from a – 387 F degrees to a plus 225 F. The space suits, just millimeters thick and so flexible they creased, keep cooled, no worries mate, depsite having to carry gallons and gallons of water in their packs to run their inner A/C along with batteries, oxygen and human waste tubes and reservoirs. (For how space suits were made that supposedly kept them in comfort, (see here) “The thin atmosphere offers little thermal insulation, so temperatures can drop quickly at night, and rise quickly due to the sun’s radiation during the day.” ..with temps varying from – 225 to + 243 every single day and night”..”The thin atmosphere offers little thermal insulation, so temperatures can drop quickly at night, and rise quickly due to the sun’s radiation during the day. Powerful radiation from sunlight on one side of an object, and shadow on the other will create a large temperature gradient. A “thermal shock” can follow, where different parts of an object thermally expand by different amounts, leading to large potentially failure-inducing strains. The effect of thermal shock is more pronounced in brittle materials such as glass, ceramics or metals below the glass transition temperature (ductile-brittle transition temperature for metals)”.(The Lunar Sourcebook (Heiken, Vaniman, & French, 1991) ***** “One Giant Blunder for Mankind, how NASA lost the moon pictures”, … read the world news headlines in 2006. Just at the time digital imaging was taking apart the NASA photos, they went lost. (Source) The missing tapes were among over 700 boxes of magnetic data tapes recorded throughout the Apollo program which have not been found.[14] On August 16, 2006 NASA announced its official search saying, “The original tapes may be at the Goddard Space Flight Center … or at another location within the NASA archiving system“, “NASA engineers are hopeful that when the tapes are found they can use today’s digital technology to provide a version of the moonwalk that is much better quality than what we have today.“ At the bottom of this post are the debunker’s replies to many of the pictures many questions asked. As you scroll down, see how many flaws you can point out and then see how it matches against the pro CGI (Computer Generated Image) specialists) **** Many more dissections of NASA pictures can be found here. http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html Jack White 1927-2012 Photographic specialist Jack White took time from his many commitments to help us investigate further into the Apollo photographic record. Also, here is an excellent narrative and analysis of NASA photo’s and storyline. http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html *** “You gonna believe me or your lying eyes?” (Nasa) Apollo 11 live footage as well as all prints have come from NASA. Every single one. Here is a highly degreed professional explaining the obvious, and glaring, errors in the photo’s provided by NASA. If one phot is faked, then all must be assumed to be faked. In an attempt to disprove our own additional lighting hypothesis, the authors went to Quantec Image Processing-UK which tested a number of NASA photos from Apollo 11. Founder, David Groves: PhD – BSc (Hons) Class I/Applied Physics. PhD in Holographic Computer Measurement. Chartered Physicist and a Member of the Insitute of Physics. http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html Another photo/image analysis…Image = Imagination ***** A Stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images by OLEG OLEYNIK, Ph.D.c Previously of the Department of Physics and Technology Kharkov State University, Ukraine AS15-87-11793 (NASA Image) Hadley: A Study in Fakery by Professor Colin Rourke ****** So who has been behind NASA since it’s inception and creation in 1958 that was put under the Dept. of War, later named the Dept. of Defense…….would you believe NAZI rocketeers and scientists ?!? Braun at his desk at Marshall Space Flight Center in May 1964, with models of the Saturn rocket family BornWernher Magnus Maximilian, Freiherr von Braun March 23, 1912 Wirsitz, Posen Province, Prussia, German Empire (modern Wyrzysk, Piła County, Poland) Wernher Magnus Maximilian, Freiherr von Braun (March 23, 1912 – June 16, 1977) was a German and later American aerospace engineer and space architect. He was one of the leading figures in the development of rocket technology in Germany and the United States and is considered one of the “Fathers of Rocket Science“. He was also a member of the Nazi party and the SS, and was suspected of perpetrating war crimes during World War II. In the late 1940’s through the 1960’s, the United States government brought known Nazi German scientists into the country illegally and quietly through Operations Paperclip (Source). Even the Presidents did not know about this operation until the 1960’s. Some 3200 scientists were brought over in all an installed in U.S. military and corporate hierarchy. The Vatican provided the passport by establishing “ratlines” as the Nazi’s first journeyed to Argentina and then up to the United States. (Source) Nazi Werhner Von Bruan was the “wunderkind” rocket builder who designed, built and then launched the deadly V1 and V2 “buzz bombs” that killed tens of thousands of allies in European during WWII. He was then brought over to the U.S where he started when NASA was founded and ran NASA’s Saturn rocket program for 26 years straight. (Source). NASA has released nearly ten thousand pictures from space. (source) Most of the pictures from space exploration and moon landings were released after 1991. **** Matthew Boylan, former NASA operational graphics manager, worked for years creating photo-realistic computer graphics for NASA. Now a vocal Flat-Earther, Boylan claims that NASA’s sole reason for existence is to propagandize the public and promote this false ball-Earth heliocentric worldview. Originally recruited because of his skills and reputation as a hyper-realist multi-media artist, he started doing projects like photoshopping various lighting and atmospheric effects onto images of Earth, the Moon, Jupiter, Europa, etc. Having proved himself, and wanting to promote him to do more classified work, a room of NASA higher-ups during a party, as a type of initiatory-rite, explained to him and a few others in detail the reality of the Geocentric Flat-Earth model and how they have fooled the entire world! Refusing to be a part of their deception, Boylan cut his ties to NASA, began researching the Flat-Earth for himself, and has recently become a powerful voice on the lecture circuit and the internet exposing NASA and their heliocentric hoax. In his comedic lectures he speaks candidly and eloquently about how simple it is using nothing more than Adobe Photoshop and a video editor to create any and every type of image NASA purports to be “receiving from the Hubble telescope.” He points out how in most ball-Earth videos lazy NASA graphics workers don’t even bother changing cloud structures in ordinary or time-lapse footage; the same shape, color and condition cloud cover often stays completely unchanged for 24 hour periods and longer! Boylan states unequivocally that every picture and video of the ball-Earth, all the Moon/Mars landings, the existence of orbiting satellites, space stations, and all Hubble images are hoaxed. He even quips anecdotes about how NASA officials and astro-nots privy to the Flat-Earth truth would laugh hysterically at the brain-washed zombie public who unquestioningly believe their televisions. **** REMEMBER, IF ONE PICTURE IS PHOTOSHOPPED, THEY ARE ALL TO BE ASSUMED FALSE AS WELL “ONE MALL STEP FOR MAN; ONE GIANT LEAP FOR MANKIND” Said to be the first footprint on the Moon by Neil Armstrong. Note the lack of impression, or depression. The heel and outside shadows prove the boot print is higher than the surface. The Moon’s surface has little atmosphere with no water so how does the shape even occur? ( Think of being on a beach, with water one gets a footprint but absent of water, just a rough outline.) Yet now and clear impression and depression made into the Moon soil. Huh? the One Footed “From Nowhere to Nowhere” NASA Image. Here we have impressions. If an astronot weighing 1/6th the weight on Earth can make that kind of impression, what kind of impression would a lunar landing module onto the surface create? Note how no impression by LM landing or even a spec of dust. hmmm. Now look at the shadows in the above NASA official picture. It is a physical impossibility for shadows from one source, the Sun, to go in two different directions. WTF? Speaking of Shadows, this is the alleged 2nd Man to walk on the Moon, Buzz “Freemason” Aldrin. This photo was said to be taken by Armstrong when he got on the Moon. Why is Buzz so well lit w/o shadow, even still partially inside LM, when all the rest of the Lunar Module is pitch black due to no atmosphere? **** ISSUED FROM NASA What kind of impact would these 10 thousand pounds of thrust created to slow the LM of a Moon weight 9,000 pound vehicle, with all the batteries, fuel, astronots, etc. would have on a dusty, grainy, no water. gray moon surface? ***** The presence of astronauts’ boot prints in the lunar dust under the LM and in the neighbourhood is far more than strange. The exhaust speed relative to the descending LM reached almost 3000 m/s, so all the dust within many meters had to be blown away. Given the distance that the exhaust plume would have spread in the absence of an atmosphere, such a situation is only possible if the engine was shut off at a height of several hundred meters during the landing, raising legitimate concern for the lives and safety of the astronauts. Breathtaking. But reading the transcript of the radio communications between the LM and Mission Control relieves anxiety and allows us to breathe more easily. In the radio communications the astronauts wisely reported the engine picking up a little dust, which partly obstructed the line of view up to completion of descent manoeuvring. So, well done! They didn’t cut the engines off. But there was no time to exhale with relief. Nevertheless, the very tricky question about the source of the dust under the LM still remains. The dust couldn’t settle, because in the absence of air it doesn’t settle, but scatters or flies away into space, as on the surface of the Moon the escape velocity is just 1700 m/s. It remains to assume the unbelievable: that the Moon has an unknown physical law, in which the particles of lunar dust have some unthinkable property to be attracted to the place from which they were blown away. Then, even more surprising, there’s no dust in its rightful place on the landing pads which remained pristine – clearly seen in the second picture. In addition to the ever-evolving model of the world, we will have to put forward another hypothesis: particles of lunar dust do not settle at all on physical objects of alien origin. Such is Occam’s Razor. **** WHERE DID THE STARS GO IN ALL NASA PICTURES? (NOT A PIC FROM NASA) the view from the Moon is not filtered through an atmosphere, so the stars have many times the luminosity as here on Earth. Even if a camera is stopped down to filter for direct sun, the blackness of space would still show the billions and billions of stars in space due to the lack of atmsphere, yet some astronots saw brilliant, amazing stars, and others saw None. hmmm Twinkle twinkle little star….where the hell did you go billions and billions of little stars…” (NASA Image) Simply, NASA could not CGI in stars because any amateur astronomer would immediately know, by the placement of stars in the sky, if the photo was real or made up. ***** REPORTER I have two brief questions that I would like to ask, if I may. When you were carrying out that incredible Moon walk, did you find that the surface was equally firm everywhere or were there harder and softer spots that you could detect. And, secondly, when you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars in the solar corona in spite of the glare? ARMSTRONG We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the Moon by eye without looking through the optics. I don’t recall during the period of time that we were photographing the solar corona what stars we could see. Neil Armstrong is credited as the astronaut with the greatest interest in observing the heavens. He had flown jet fighters at 40,000 feet to observe the clarity of the universe at that rarefied altitude. Yet he man could not see billions of stars from the Moon surface even though their was no atmosphere to opaque the stars? Wait Found ’em, just took a couple decades www.nasa.gov 4288 × 2844 Search by image Space shuttle Atlantis while still docked with the International Space Station ***** “Outside my window I can see stars – and that is all. Where I know the moon to be, there is simply a black void; the moon’s presence is defined solely by the absence of stars”. Michael Collins, coming around from the Dark Side of the Moon in Apollo Command Module. ***** And M.I.T. Doctorate, Buzz Aldrin had same problem finding billions of stars I slowly allowed my eyes to drink in the unusual majesty of the moon. In its starkness and monochromatic hues, it was indeed beautiful. But it was a different sort of beauty than I had ever before seen. Magnificent, I thought, then said: “Magnificent desolation.” It was a spontaneous utterance, an oxymoron that would take on ever-deeper dimensions of meaning in describing this strange, new environment. THEN, for the first time since stepping on the surface, I looked upward, above the LM. It was not an easy thing to do in a pressurised suit, inflated as stiff as a football, with a gold sun visor jutting out from my helmet. But I managed to direct my view homeward, and there in the black, starless sky I could see our planet, no bigger than my thumb. (from autobiography, “Magnificent Desolation”) **** “Wait Found ’em again! It just took us a decade to capture the billions and billions of stars on our cameras.” Starry Night; The space shuttle Endeavour—payload bay doors ajar—rushes past Earth while docked to the International Space Station on May 28, 2011. Photograph courtesy NASA ***** What Astronots should of seen and filmed while on the Moon. ***** “Houston, it’s been a real change for us. Now we are able to see the stars again and recognize constellations for the first time on the trip. The sky is filled with stars, just like the nights out in Earth” 1st Man on the Moon ~ Neil Armstrong (Rene, R. NASA Mooned America!, 1994) ***** Dr Mitchell expounded to the large audience about how his life had been transformed by the voyage to the Moon on Apollo 14. Edgar explained that as the vehicle revolved to allow solar cooling: he was astounded by the alternating view of the Sun, the Earth and above all the incredible ‘heavenly’ view of the stars. Dr Mitchell explained that the stars were ‘magnificent’, and described them as being ‘ten times brighter’ than when observed from Earth. In … truncated (48,861 more characters in archive)