Ring Makers Of Saturn – What Is The Truth? – Unexplainable.net .lazyload[data-src]{display:none !important;} Skip to content Unexplainable.net Watching The World Change Near-death experience Induced With ketamine Information and Theories Unexplainable Phenomena Movies , Facts About “Stigmata” Religion Articles Theories and Observations: the White Buffalo Woman Myth Information and Theories Zombie Bacteria from Milennia Ago in Lab Technology Articles Ajna (6th chakra) Meditation And Spirituality The Moon Space and Astrology The Colors of Magick: Warm Colors Information and Theories Who is St. Patrick? Information and Theories Near-death experience Induced With ketamine Information and Theories Unexplainable Phenomena Movies , Facts About “Stigmata” Religion Articles Theories and Observations: the White Buffalo Woman Myth Information and Theories Zombie Bacteria from Milennia Ago in Lab Technology Articles Ajna (6th chakra) Meditation And Spirituality The Moon Space and Astrology prev next Ring Makers Of Saturn – What Is The Truth? Posted on December 8, 2005 By jim No Comments on Ring Makers Of Saturn – What Is The Truth? HTML clipboard Back in March of 2001 material relating to NASA image P-23876C, came into my possession. It wasn’t until recently that I was able to obtain the news release accompanying the image. The material related to images that were the foundation images used for a news release, dated Aug. 13, 1981, and image created by NASA/JPL, intended as a comparison of the Voyager I and II images, and to highlight changes apparent in Saturn’s colour patterns. Upon examination, these B&W Voyager I frames appeared to suggest that images being used to demonstrate the presence of large spacecraft, or electromagnetic vehicles (EMVs) in the vicinity of Saturn were in fact composed of several frames, and not at all representative of a “single” Voyager 1 exposure. Back then, I believed there existed the possibility that what I had was manufactured evidence, and that the Ringmakers, as theorized by Dr. Norman Bergrun in his book “Ringmakers of Saturn” (published in 1986), were indeed extraterrestrial machinery. Therefore, after notifying interested parties of my initial findings, I shelved the material for later study. Instead, it was stored away and neglected for almost wo years, until recent new review demonstrated the validity of the images. And also pointed to an error contained in my own research into high speed anomalies in orbit around Saturn, and elsewhere in the solar system. While I still believe it is within the realm of possibility that huge electromagnetic vehicles (I believe this name to be a misnomer, and I will get into the reasons later in this work) exist within our solar system, I no longer believe them to be “nuts and bolts” type machinery, and that P-23876C – or any of its misnomered successors – was generated for specific purpose. Which may or may not have been apparent to the scientist/technician working on the project at that time. At this point it is best we first clear up some technical facts by noting that P-23876C is apparently the only image of record in the JPL library index which demonstrates the anomaly we have come to identify as P23870 (which transparency I purchased from Finley Holiday in 2001 and make reference to in this work). There remains one conclusion only after considerable research: that P23870 is none other than P-23876C. Which fact has been supported by Finley Holiday in writing. And it is my further conclusion that at some point a typographical error resulted in the “6” being typed as a “0” on the commercial transparency previously available from Finley Holiday and labeled P23870, which clearly shows on the image in my possession. (Note: The “C” on NASA transparencies indicates that the image has been coloured. Ironically, it could also denote a composed image). Therefore, for purposes of this writing, reference will be made only to P-23876C, as that is the only JPL image referenced bearing the slightest resemblance to the phenomena demonstrated, and referenced elsewhere as P23870. It has been effectively demonstrated to be the same image. At the request of the author Dr. Norman Bergrun, The Ringmakers of Saturn web pages, which included a labeled image by himself of P23870, are no longer available on the Anomalog web site but I have included a copy in this presentation copied from the purchased slide in my possession, as well as the original data file image of P23876 received from a company in Germany. As we proceed, I think you will find that the evidence speaks for itself. However, the crude reproduction of the same images using the NASA/JPL original B&W frames from Voyager 1 will give you some basic reference point. It is also interesting to note that P23876 precedes by 5 years the similar image appearing in Dr. Bergrun’s work, Ringmakers of Saturn, published in 1986. I draw no conclusions from that fact, other than to note that no other image source has ever been made available to support the theory that the image used by Dr. Bergrun in his book is anything other than the composed image P23876 as published by NASA/JPL. The one attempt, previously published on Anomalog and removed at the author’s request. at proving the existence of a separate source of supporting data for the Ringmaker hypothesis turned out to be bogus, a likely typo(?). This was written about by Dr. Bergrun as P23870 and used in support of the original Ringmakers of Saturn work. How it came to be misnomered I won’t speculate on. P23870 does exist at NASA/JPL, but it is an artist’s conception of the Voyager 1 spacecraft on its way to Saturn. I had hoped the author of Ringmakers of Saturn would review and discuss this present work. But that has not occurred. As previously indicated, P-23876C was generated in support of a published news release. This image is still available on the internet in a low resolution format (72 dpi) http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/saturn/gif/saturn82.gif . The hi-res digital file can be purchased directly from JPL, or any of their officially designated vendors. And, as stated above, a copy of the original news release and image dated August 13. 1981 is in my possession. A DEMONSTRATION OF THE DATA The following images were captured from the NASA Voyagers To The Outer Planets (Voyager I – Saturn Encounter) CD ROM Volume ID: VG_0027 Version 1, 1995. NASAVIEW was used to retrieve and save the images in gif format. Paint Shop Pro 7 (Anniversary Edition) was then utilized for the assemblage. As the images are viewed, you will clearly note the lack of professionalism, most particularly in the coloration, and also in the image layering. No claims are made as to the author’s artistic abilities, but he does stand voraciously behind the conclusions formulated during the analysis. This first animation shows several images shot by Voyager I, and are representative of the spacecraft’s movements during a brief period of time. As you will note, Voyager I is demonstrating quite erratic movement (which is demonstrated by the environmental log below Voyager I Image Log). Of particular note is that there is one only point of light visible at any one time during this cycle. The following layered image is a montage of the four Voyager I images that JPL/NASA claim P-23876C was derived. As is clearly demonstrated, the images of Saturn do not align. However, clearly the four separate “points of light” sources, noted in the brief animation at the beginning of this article, are resolved in one place. This is interpreted as conclusive evidence that the Voyager spacecraft has changed imaging position with each frame. A check of the Longitudinal notations for each of the four shots: 269.61, 270.53, 271.45, & 338.70.` demonstrates this movement. It is important to clearly understand that the “solitary point of light” DOES NOT appear in four SEPARATE LOCATIONS in relation to Saturn, but is resolved in one place. This proves dramatically that all four occurrences of “light points” in P-23876C, in relation to the atypical ring structure, to be the same anomaly. Further, that it is not a point in space as is Saturn, but rather, it is attached to the camera, probably a dust spot, or perhaps damage to the narrow angle lens, its protective coating, or any protective filter that may form part of the camera mounting. This conclusion is further concluded by establishing that the “artifact” is evident in the same location on all of the studied Voyager I images utilizing the narrow angle camera. This writer has viewed several hundreds of Voyager I images, and this same artifact shows in all of them, and in the same relative location. Nowhere in the NASA Voyager I data base is it possible to find the particular “satellite” arrangement evident in P-23876C. To believe that the evidence has been in some way manipulated for the express purpose of disproving the existence of the Ringmakers would be a stretch of the imagination, even for those inclined to demonstrate fiction as truth. I am aware of no reasonable way the Voyager I transmitted data could have been changed without an army of technicians working overtime to accomplish that feat. Every Voyager I narrow angle camera raw data image would have required alteration in order to allow for the “artifact” reproduced in P-23876C”. If the cut-off ring data is true phenomena covering a span of time, the raw data also would require editing to remove collaborating data demonstrating sustained cut-off ring pattern anomaly. There would most certainly exist coincidental data to either side of P-23876C, if it were an “original” exposure. Nor can it easily be claimed that this was a “staged” demonstration of EMV power, as no one would reasonably suggest that creation of the Saturn rings, or their discontinuation for specific purpose, could be accomplished within minutes, leaving no ancillary evidence of its happening. Or could it? There is one possibility, relating more to the UFO phenomenon, than to anything that has heretofore been published about electromagnetic vehicles. More on this later when we discuss archetypal imperative. electromagnetic These following two images are jpg files of the original news release images. Following the images is the actual news release as published by NASA in 1981. No comment need be made regarding them, as they pretty well speak for themselves. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE JET PROPULSION LABORATORY NATIONAL AERONATICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91109. TELEPHONE (213)354-5011 PHOTO CAPTION (TOP) Aug. 13, 1981 P-23876C 50202 Photographs taken by NASA’s Voyager 1 (left) and Voyager 2 (right) show how features in Saturn’s northern hemisphere and the brightness of its rings have changed in nine months between encounters by the two spacecraft. Both photos are composed from images taken through ultraviolet, violet and green filters. The unique blue band just north of the equatorial region in the Voyager 1 image is believed to be strip of deeper atmosphere unobscured by the high level haze that hides lower atmosphere acitivty beneath surrounding belts and zones. But in the recent Voyager 2 image, the same band is now whitish, suggesting that high clouds or aerosola have formed over this area. The broad temperate latitude above the blue band in Voyager 1’s photograph contains two distinct bands (yellow and purplish-brown); Voyager 2 sees the same area as a single, broader bluish-orange band showing more highly defined bright features. The sun-angle on Saturn’s rings has obviously become higher since Voyager 1’s encounter, as seen in the bright appearance of the rings in the second image. The Voyager 1 picture was taken Oct. 18, 1980 from a distance of 34 million kilometers (21 million miles). The Voyager 2 image was taken July 12, 1981. The Voyager project is managed for NASA by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. *** Now that we have established that existing physical evidence does not apparently support the existence of Ringmakers as has been previously described, it remains extremely important that we begin a dialogue to establish possible reasons for the existence of P-23876C. It confounds belief that a NASA/JPL scientist (or image processing technician) would go to such lengths as to produce a comparative Voyager I – II composition using four separate images of such diverse nature. The composed image is easier understood when it is known that four different colour filters were used on the narrow angle camera: Green, Blue, Violet, & Ultra Violet (UV). [Note: when an image is taken with UV filters in place, anything that is blue, is in normal light conditions just dark, and anything that is white, is in normal light conditions just ultra violet.] This information gets us at least part way to our goal. However, where we run into trouble, is in our attempts to justify technical logic at that time, in selecting four obviously dissimilar images – two of them with missing ring data – when there were many other more suitable complete ring combinations available from which to compose the Voyager I portion of the image. It is highly illogical for image P-23876C to have been composed highlighting missing data from the Voyager I mission, given that the Voyager II portion, although composed of the same filter combination, demonstates a completed ring. It is akin to comparing apples and oranges, making the Voyager I portion of the image (with its incomplete ring) akin to artistic expression, rather than any true representation of ring structure as imaged by Voyager I. The important question is why bother? That someone, or some persons, felt it important to so do, inevitably leads to the speculation that something else was happening at that time, which inevitably led to the purposeful creation of P-23876C. (Note: I will no longer refer to P23870, as that image, as it has been represented, has never existed outside of a printing identification error. P23870C exists at NASA as an artist’s conception of the Voyager 1 craft) With that thought in mind, lets postulate three possibilities 1) The image was created for mind control purposes, which would include the channeling of creative energy away from something else that may have been apparent in the Voyager images. 2) Creativity run amok as a joke, the “let’s design something and see who does what with it”. 3) Or perhaps it represents what, for lack of better terminology, we may consider as archetypal imperative; that the technician had no other recourse than to express an inner truth through his artistic interpretation of the Voyager I data. Either by an intuitive interpretation of the separate images being worked upon, or by other things happening with NASA/JPL at that time. While there is undoubtedly fertile ground for exploration in either of the first two options, especially the black ops angle, a lengthy examination of them will not be considered at this time. For now, my purpose is to demonstrate that this image was created, and that it was so done for purposes of establishing a sociological event. An emotional response was elicited, if you would, striking to the core of the UFO phenomenon, and which is addressed most directly throughout this work. NASA VOYAGER I DATA PERTINENT TO THE FOUR IMAGES USED IN THE COMPILATION OF P-23876C. Recap: 3419143: Green Filter: Latitude = 10.94 Longitude = 269.61 Date = 1980-10-18 T21:55:46Z Transmitted 1980-10-19 3419145: UV Filter, Latitude = 10.91, Longitude = 270.53 Date = 1980-10-18 T21:57:22Z Transmitted 1980-10-19 3419147: Violet Filter, Latitude = 10.80, Longitude = 271.45 Date = 1980-10-18 T21:58:58Z Transmitted 1980-10-19 3419413: Blue Filter, Latitude = 8.48, Longitude = 338.70 Date = 1980-10-18 T23:55:46Z Transmitted 1980-10-19 Complete Data from the Voyager I image log” “VOYAGER_1”,”SATURN_ENCOUNTER “,”SATURN “,”1667S1-026″,34191.43,”1980-10-18T21:55:46Z”,”1980-10-19T16:36:12Z”,” NARROW_ANGLE_CAMERA”,”1:1 “,”NAONLY “,”LOW “,”1:1 “,”GREEN “, 5, 1.9200,” “,”11111111”,”NONE “,”VG_0027 “,”[SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419143.IMQ”,”VG_0027 “,”[BROWSE.SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419143.IBG “VOYAGER_1”,”SATURN_ENCOUNTER “,”SATURN “,”1669S1-026″,34191.45,”1980-10-18T21:57:22Z”,”1980- 10-19T16:40:41Z”,”NARROW_ANGLE_CAMERA”,”1:1 “,”NAONLY “,”LOW “,”1:1 “,”UV “, 7,15.3600,””,”11111111″,”NONE “,”VG_0027 “,”[SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419145.IM”,”VG_0027 “,”[BROWSE.SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419145.IBG “VOYAGER_1”,”SATURN_ENCOUNTER “,”SATURN “,”1671S1-026″,34191.47,”1980-10-18T21:58:58Z”,”1980-10-19 T16:45:08Z”,”NARROW_ANGLE_CAMERA”,”1:1 “,”NAONLY “,”LOW “,”1:1 “,”VIOLET “, 1, 1.9200,” “,”11111111”,”NONE “,”VG_0027 “,”[SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419147.IMQ”,”VG_0027 “,”[BROWSE.SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419147.IBG “VOYAGER_1”,”SATURN_ENCOUNTER “,”SATURN “,”0017S1-025″,34194.13,”1980-10-18T23:55:46Z”,”1980-10-19T16: 54:01Z”,”NARROW_ANGLE_CAMERA”,”1:1 “,”NAONLY “,”LOW “,”1:1 “,”BLUE “, 2, 1.4400,” “,”11111111”,”NONE “,”VG_0027 “,”[SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419413.IMQ”,”VG_0027 “,”[BROWSE.SATURN.C3419XXX]C3419413.IBG Information and Theories Post navigation Previous Post: The Illinois UFO Alien Sightings of January, 2000, Part 1Next Post: Aerospace Defense Research finds Free Energy and Antigravity Possible Related Posts A Troubled Paris Jackson Tweets About the Illuminati Information and Theories International Explorers , William Dampier Information and Theories The Memetic Matrix Information and Theories Bird Superstitions 1 Information and Theories Understanding Freedom”¦ man’s conceptual paradox Information and Theories Eating During Medieval Times Part I Information and Theories A Troubled Paris Jackson Tweets About the Illuminati Information and Theories International Explorers , William Dampier Information and Theories The Memetic Matrix Information and Theories Bird Superstitions 1 Information and Theories prev next Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. SearchSearchRecent PostsThe Meat Eater couple arrested for child abuse The Meat-Eater boxer kidnapped and raped a young school Girl Carnist man arrested for 198 years for raping and shooting a woman Mitch McConnell- Eating Cow Corpses Animal Flesh Eater Arrested: Felony Charges Serious Injury To 3 Month Old! Recent CommentsNo comments to show.Archives January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 May 2020 June 2018 February 2018 July 2016 May 2016 February 2016 September 2015 July 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 July 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 … truncated (1,718 more characters in archive)