Genocide Genocide Genocide is more than mass murder that wipes out a whole people. It covers acts intended to destroy national or ethnic groups such as Englishmen. The United Nations definition [ see UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide ] includes more. It applies to what Jews, in particular Zionist crazies are doing to Western Civilization, as well as the people of Palestine, the Stolen Land. It is what the Jews claim that naughty Adolf was doing to them - see the Holocaust® Story on the point. A step on that road is Ethnic Cleansing or Ethnic Fouling aka the Great Replacement. Of course when Jews are perpetrators it is different. It is one of the reasons why there are people who think Adolf had a point. PS The Genocide Convention was adopted in 1948 then pretty much ignored. Genocide Looms For White Farmers In South Africa Blacks are sincerely Racist. In fact they are tribalist too. They have been manipulated by Jews. cunning Jews, Racist Jews to be sure but manipulated none the less. Joe Slovo was only one of them, part of the South African Communist Party, being used by rich Jews like Harry Oppenheimer, who ran De Beers. Four Out Of Ten Murder Victims In South Africa Are WhiteQUOTEIt’s business as usual in South Africa where the ANC has won a predictable victory in the first elections since the death of Mandela. It is unlikely there will be any big changes in a country mired by one corruption scandal after another, which is now the murder capital of the world and which is slowly sliding into economic chaos. And one thing that will not be changing soon will be a relentless upward tick in the grim daily toll of murders of Whites by Blacks. Around 50 murders take place in South Africa every day and according to Genocidewatch around 20 of these are of Whites by Blacks — a grossly disproportionate figure for a minority who make up only nine per cent of the total population. This and the shrill, blood curdling threats from some Black politicians mean many Boers fear a White bloodbath in the future...... Ethnic hatred is a clear factor in these killings, with murder scenes often featuring such graffiti as “Kill the Boer” in blood. An unspeakable level of savagery is also a feature. Gruesome torture with pangas, electric irons or kitchen implements are frequent features and the average victim is elderly. On the day Mandela died, an 84-year-old Afrikaaner woman was robbed in her own home, held down and drowned in her bath........ You might think that with their own history of persecution and sensitivity to pogrom-style killings the Jewish community might be sympathetic. You would be mistaken. For organised Jewry is at the forefront of attempts to howl down, marginalise and discredit the White claims. A good example came in the South African TV interview of the Red October founder [ Sunette Bridges ] where the presenter, an “anti-racist” Jewish judge began by telling the TV audience that the claims are exaggerated........... Both the Africaans and the English-speaking media now give only the most cursory accounts of farm violence often omitting names, ethnicities or progress of investigations. (An exception is the current celebrity murder trial of Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius [ because he is white - Editor ]) Prominent amongst these naysayers are the South African bureau of an international NGO called Africa Check and the university-based Centre for the Study of Open Democracy which are both largely Jewish-run and funded.......... It is worth remembering that the ANC was largely a Jewish creation and the senior ranks were dominated by Jewish communists who talent-spotted and groomed new talent like the young Nelson Mandela whose legal career owed everything to Jewish patronage (see “The role of Jews in South Africa since 1948” by Sam Davidson, The Occidental Quarterly, Summer, 2011). Jews also dominate the main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance. Both its current leader and previous leader and many of its shadow cabinet are Jewish...... Soon Johannesburg will be blessed with the opening of that ultimate international status symbol of Jewish triumphalism — it’s own Holocaust Museum in a plush new building on Jan Smuts Avenue. It will be the third holocaust centre to be opened in South Africa and all schools will be required to visit it. You can bet that the opening ceremony will be a lavish affair.UNQOTEGenocide is policy. So is pandering to Jews. They own the gold mines. They marketed Mandela as a world figure. Jews are setting up the New World Order. Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic cleansing is an ugly euphemism for mass murder, terrorism and driving people from their land. It is popular with the Zionist thugs running Israel. So is the cant going with it. Eight Stages of GenocideThis theoretical paper does not address the issue of governments being perverted, becoming the Enemy Within. UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of GenocideQUOTE Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. Article III: The following acts shall be punishable: (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) Attempt to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide. UNQUOTEArticle III covers a lot of politicians.PS This site tells us that Raphael Lemkin is against genocide. In fact Lemkin is a Jew who will have contrived not know that Zionist crazies who run Israel are keen mass murderers. Genocide ex WikiQUOTE Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. While a precise definition varies among genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group." Because of the insistence of Joseph Stalin, this definition of genocide under international law does not include political groups.UNQUOTEThis what Jews are doing to Christendom now. Genocide In Armenia Politics in the Middle East are a blood sport but telling the truth is not good for the perpetrators. Jews claim it was not genocide. Who believes a Jew? A mug punter. Eight Stages of Genocide You might find this enlightening. There again you might not. White genocide conspiracy theory ex Wiki The title is verbatim & the Wiki's corruption at its most blatant.QUOTE The white genocide conspiracy theory is a neo-Nazi, alt-right, white nationalist/supremacist conspiracy theory,[1] which contends that any one of mass immigration, racial integration, miscegenation, low fertility rates, abortion, governmental land-confiscation from whites, organised violence[2] or eliminationism are being promoted in either predominantly white countries, or supposedly white-founded countries, to deliberately replace, remove, or liquidate white populations,[3] dismantle white collective power,[4] turn the countries minority-white, and hence cause white people to become extinct through forced assimilation[2] or violent genocide.[5] The conspiracy theory was developed by the neo-Nazi David Lane in about 1995. The phrase "anti-racist is a code word for anti-white", coined by high-profile white nationalist Robert Whitaker, is commonly associated with the topic of white genocide.[6][7] It has appeared on billboards in the United States near Birmingham, Alabama[8] and Harrison, Arkansas.[9] The conspiracy theory had already been purported [ sic ] in Nazi Germany by a pamphlet written for the "Research Department for the Jewish question" of Walter Frank's "Reich Institute" with the title "Are the White Nations Dying? The Future of the White and the Colored Nations in the Light of Biological Statistics".[10] The conspiracy theory has been expressed in South Africa and France. It has also been commonly used both interchangeably with,[11] and as a broader and more extreme version of Renaud Camus's 2012 The Great Replacement conspiracy theory, which focuses on the white Christian population of France.[12][13] In August 2018, US President Donald Trump was accused of endorsing the conspiracy theory in a foreign policy tweet instructing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to investigate South African "land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers",[14][15][16] claiming that the "South African government is now seizing land from white farmers".[17] The often critical narrative derived from farm attacks, and land reform, is an established subset theme of the broader conspiracy theory,[4] portrayed in media as a form of gateway or proxy issue to "white genocide" within the wider context of the Western world.[18][17] The topic in relation to South Africa and Zimbabwe is also simply used interchangeably with the subject,[19] as well as being used by white nationalists as a parabolic concept, or cautionary tale,[20] to justify policies to retain or increase white majorities in nation-states, or otherwise maintain their vision of white supremacy.[3][17] UNQUOTE The Wikipedia is just as much a Propaganda machine as the Main Stream Media but it works within a limitation, trying to look impartial. In that it is just like the BBC. Naturally enough it does not mention that Jews, the Zionist crazies who run Palestine, the Stolen Land they call Israel are very keen on Ethnic Cleansing to get rid of Blacks & Arabs. The Wiki knows a lot about lying by omission; it mentions Camus but not Jean Raspail or his best known book, Camp Of The Saints Is about Third World immigration flooding civilization. It annoyed various people. It is rather like the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion; it tells the truth or something very like it. The objectors are the same sort of rogue too. M Raspail's book was published in 1973. It is prescient. The Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory ex Wiki QUOTE The great replacement (French: le grand remplacement) is a far-right conspiracy theory,[1][2][3][4][5] which states that the white Catholic French population, and white Christian European population at large,[6] is being systematically replaced with non-European people,[5] specifically Middle Eastern, North and Sub-Saharan African populations,[3] through mass migration and demographic growth. It associates the presence of Muslims in France with potential danger and destruction of French culture and civilization.[7] The conspiracy theory commonly apportions blame to a global and liberal elite,[6] such as Brussels and the European Union, which is portrayed as directing a planned and deliberate plot or scheme to carry out the replacement of European peoples.[4] The theory has been popularized by Renaud Camus. This notion of replacement, or of white genocide, has echoed throughout the rhetoric of many anti-migrant far-right movements in the West.[8] Among its main promoters are not only far-right populist parties but also a wide-ranging network of protest movements (e.g., Pegida), ideological groupuscules (e.g., bloc identitaire),[9] bloggers (e.g., Fjordman), and noted intellectuals (e.g., Eric Zemmour). Prominent radical right-wing websites such as Gates of Vienna, Politically Incorrect, and France de Souche have provided a platform for bloggers to diffuse and popularize the conspiracy theory.[10] UNQUOTE This Conspiracy Theory [ the phrase is a propaganda term ] is essentially the same as the #White genocide conspiracy theory. It was advanced by #Renaud Camus, who seems, surprisingly, not to be another Left Wing loud mouth. M Camus is not alone. The myth of New World genocide ex The Spectator QUOTE Shortly before the coronation of Charles III, a group of indigenous leaders from around the commonwealth released a statement. They called on the King ‘to acknowledge the horrific impacts on and legacy of genocide and colonisation of the indigenous and enslaved peoples,’ including ‘the oppression of our peoples, plundering of our resources, (and) denigration of our culture.’ Charles was told to ‘redistribute the wealth that underpins the crown back to the peoples from whom it was stolen.’ Yet the argument that Britain should pony up for its historical sins is based on a number of rickety assumptions. One of these is that a substantial portion of the wealth of the UK, or the British Crown, derives from slavery or colonial exploitation. Famously, empire often cost more than it brought in. And, like the rest of northwest Europe, the UK was already wealthy before colonialism or the slave trade. Western Europe would have remained rich even in the absence of overseas adventurism. Germany, for example, was one of the world’s richest areas, long before it gained any colonies. It’s true that overseas resources were exploited; but this was not the sole source of Europe’s wealth. Far from it. Even more questionable than the call for reparations are the claims of ‘genocide’ in the context of New World colonialism. Until a few years ago, only a tiny fringe of historians believed that European colonialism in the New World was ‘genocidal’. In the six-volume, 3,000+ page Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas (published 1996-2000) several dozen specialists saw fit to mention genocide precisely twice. In both of these instances, the scholars in question do so only to reiterate that it did not apply. There are many reasons why historians long shied away from using the term ‘genocide’. There was a recognition that the word should be reserved only for extreme cases, such as the Nazis’ attempt to eliminate Europe’s Jews. Using the word to describe the activities of European colonisers and their respective governments surely falls short of this, because the elimination of native populations was seldom – if ever – a deliberate or sustained policy........... The Spanish government, for example, went to great lengths to protect natives. In 1542, it passed the ‘New Laws of the Indies for the Good Treatment and Preservation of the Indians’. It also established self-governing Republicas de Indios, where Europeans were not allowed to own land. All of this was done with the purpose of increasing Indian population levels – and, by all accounts, it worked: native population levels began to recover soon after. Even when policies came closest to something we would recognise as ‘genocidal’, as during the American Trail of Tears debacle, context reveals a host of reasons why, even here, historians have been reluctant to use this term.............. In recent years, the study of history has become increasingly politicised. Claims of genocide across the New World have subsequently emerged – but these are riddled with demographic exaggerations. New Left darling Howard Zinn acknowledged that Hispaniola, the island where Columbus first landed in 1492, likely had about 250,000 people. UNQUOTE Recall that various Left Wing liars alleged genocide in Tasmania. Using the Education Industry to market fraudulent history is part of the Long March Through The Institutions. They were countered by Keith Windschuttle in his book, The Fabrication Of Aboriginal History. Zionists In Israel Stole Babies From Jews [ 14 August 2016 ] QUOTE It is Israel’s darkest secret – or so argues one Israeli journalist – in a country whose short history is replete with dark episodes. Last month Tzachi Hanegbi, minister for national security, became the first government official to admit that hundreds of babies had been stolen from their mothers in the years immediately following Israel’s creation in 1948. In truth, the number is more likely to be in the thousands. For nearly seven decades, successive governments – and three public inquiries – denied there had been any wrongdoing. They concluded that almost all the missing babies had died, victims of a chaotic time when Israel was absorbing tens of thousands of new Jewish immigrants............. Mr Hanegbi, who was given the task of re-examining the classified material by prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has been evasive on the question of official involvement. “We may never know,” he has said.......... The stolen babies were not randomly seized. A very specific group was targeted: Jews who had just immigrated from the Middle East. Most were from Yemen, with others from Iraq, Morocco and Tunisia. The Arabness of these Jews was viewed as a direct threat to the Jewish state’s survival, and one almost as serious as the presence of Palestinians. Israel set about “de-Arabising” these Middle Eastern Jews with the same steely determination with which it had just driven out most of the area’s Palestinians......... The Israeli historian Ilan Pappe has observed that settler colonial movements are distinguished from ordinary colonialism by what he terms the “logic of elimination” that propels them.............. Israeli campaigners seeking justice for the families of the stolen babies point out that the forcible transfer of children from one ethnic group to another satisfies the United Nation’s definition of Genocide............ Rather, it should alert Israel’s Arab Jews to the fact that they face the same enemy as the Palestinians: a European Jewish establishment that remains resolutely resistant to the idea of living in peace and respect with either Arabs or the region. UNQUOTE Jonathan Cook, a respectable journalist living in Bethlehem knows of what he writes albeit he is polite enough not to mention that Tzachi Hanegbi is a determined liar convicted of Perjury. Yes, Genocide is government policy in Palestine, the Stolen Land that Jews call Israel. I think he is completely wrong about that against Aboriginals in Australia; he has assumed that Main Stream Media and the Education Industry were not lying in their teeth. NB Jews are Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Mizrahi & other tribes. All are grossly Racist, which is why Ashkenazi like Ben Gurion are so keen on Genocide. Western establishments are opting for a full population replacement to keep the ball rolling [ 29 June 2017 ] The technical term is Genocide, which is a crime under international law. See e.g. the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide QUOTE The Gefira team has taken a year to analyze the current state of affairs in the world. The promising role of the BRICS countries has disappeared whilst the US still has the characteristics of a waning power and the European Union failed to become the world’s leader. The global economy cannot operate without a decisive intervention from central banks. The Western powers did not succeed in bringing democracy to the Middle East and the conflicts with Islamists are intensifying. Nationalism in Europe is on the rise while the global elites keep on foisting a multicult… truncated (10,080 more characters in archive)