Among my favorite hoax topics is the fraudulence of the International Space Station. Videos purporting to be from the International Space Station are absolutely not taken from orbit. This has been …
Irrefutable Scientific Proof ISS Footage is Fraudulent – Piece of Mindful Skip to content Piece of Mindful How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again! (Mark Twain) Primary Menu Home About This Blog (and its writers)expand child menu Start Here Commenting Policy Maarten’s Posts Mark’s Posts Steve’s Posts Tyrone’s Posts Irrefutable Scientific Proof ISS Footage is Fraudulent Among my favorite hoax topics is the fraudulence of the International Space Station. Videos purporting to be from the International Space Station are absolutely not taken from orbit. This has been demonstrated without the slightest shadow of a doubt in many different ways. There are dozens of undeniable anomalies in videos without any acceptable explanation. These are conclusive to anyone who is fairly judging; the ISS footage cannot possibly be shot in a real weightless free-fall orbit environment. With that said, I think I have discovered the most conclusive self-outing ISS video possible. The smoking gun, if you will. In this post, you will find a video of André Kuipers (pictured above) and a screw, and boy does André really screw the pooch with this screw… For the already well-documented ISS outings, there are the many cases where the ISS actors get tangled up or pull on their invisible wire harnesses. The best examples of this are the failed space somersaults by the old astronauts, where the old farts fail spectacularly and are obviously brought back down by typical surface-Earth gravity. The ISS ought to implement age limits on their somersault demonstrations. They give away the whole charade. Then there are actually videos where the harnesses are still visible and accidentally not cropped out! Take a peek at the GIF below. Good luck trying to justify that one, with some guy meant to look like he is hovering by in the background while wearing a full body wire harness! Beyond this, we have the videos where men disappear before turning a corner. There are videos where objects disappear suddenly, or where ISS actors are pretending to manipulate a weightless object where we just see them doing funny motions with their hands and no actual object. Not to mention all the women with the obviously bad hairspray job done on their hair. The list goes on and on. The best of these videos is prepared in compilation format and found on (sigh) Flat Earth YouTube pages. Here I can link you to a YouTube search, if interested. I refuse to link or directly embed Flat Earth content. Readers, feel free to add video links in the comments below. My general point is that the ISS has already been outed. Conclusively. With that said, there is always just the slightest amount of wiggle room left in these examples so that members of the herd can find a way to deny it. I am sure if you are a herd member and read the paragraphs above you thought: Well, what if that harness was for something else? Well maybe the belt is just part of the uniform? Maybe the shirt is just dimpling unusually? Well maybe it was just an awkward somersault? Of course the woman’s hair would get crazy in space! This guy is a nut job! The gymnastics we get from this sort are truly impressive. They think we are the kooks, when in truth you would have to be blind to excuse away all of these obvious, obvious cases of clear fraudulence. These videos are thorough outings. There is no possible chance the videos are being shot in a genuine weightless orbit environment. Ah, the things people will believe if an authority tells them it is so!! With all of that said about existing outings, I just stumbled across a video which is more compelling than any I have ever seen before. This video cannot possibly be explained away by shills and fanboys. It conclusively defies the basic laws of gravity. Since most ISS videos are heavily edited with fake weightless objects, the best debunking examples usually revolve around glitches in these computer graphics. We have to imagine that computers are making certain objects visible or invisible…it makes it hard for your average Joe to believe it. They hide behind the cognitive dissonance of not WANTING to believe it. Rarely do we have an example of an ISS actor touching a piece of the actual “set” in a way that would reveal gravity’s unencumbered effect upon that real object. I am sure they are trained to not manipulate real objects for this very reason. Enter André Kuipers, a man who really shits the bed here. Please watch the very short clip below. What a “screw” up! I had never seen this video before, so I do not know if it has been buried by the algorithms or what. I have done extensive research in this area before and I am stunned this video is not more popular. As of my posting here, this Vimeo video has 62 views in 10 months. A little strange if you ask me, or sad in either case. For anyone who did not bother to watch the clip, Kuipers is explaining something about the toilet, proceeds to unscrew something, then accidentally loses control of the screw. Does the screw float or fall? Who wants to take a guess? If this is a real weightless orbit environment, this screw should be floating around. What actually happens? It drops like a stone! His attention is immediately drawn to the floor where the object has fallen. Not only is this a completely impossible event in space or orbit, I can actually use the basic physics to prove conclusively that this must actually be occurring on the surface of planet Earth. If you take a stopwatch from the moment he finishes unscrewing until you hear the screw hit the floor, you will get a free-fall time of about a half second. Kuipers is 5’10” and drops the screw from just below shoulder height. This means that the screw dropped somewhere around 4 feet. How long would free-fall from this height take under the force of gravity on the surface of Earth (at a gravitational acceleration of 9.81 m/s2)? Almost precisely 0.5 seconds, the exact amount of free-fall time we witnessed in the video! This is conclusive proof that we are witnessing footage shot on the surface of the Earth. So there you have it, folks! This is the dream mistake that I feel we have always been looking for and lacking. The classic test of gravity, dropping an object, has been shown in ISS footage and it obliterates any notion that the footage was shot in orbit. I welcome anyone to try and explain otherwise. Such an event is not possible in orbit. As for how NASA and the rest of the fakers create all of this footage, that is worthy of a whole post. They have fancy virtual reality contact lenses that allow the astronaut actors to seem like they are manipulating weightless objects (like a weightless microphone). They love to spin and twirl these objects for maximum effect. In one video, when a woman starts to get tangled in her wires, another astronaut quickly pulls out a fake weightless baseball and starts spinning it as if to say “look over here!”. It is comical stuff. Beyond the virtual objects, we get a mixture of plain old CGI and Photoshop-type tricks, with an occasional video shot in the swimming pool (for space walks) or the parabolic vomit airplane. Speaking of the parabolic airplane, check out the video below. In it, American astronaut Karen Nyberg tries to convince us that this is actually how she washes her hair on the ISS. What stands out to me? This 160 seconds worth of footage has at least 14 distinct cuts in it, for an average shot length of 11.4 seconds…and don’t forget about the dulled sound of what definitely seems like jet engines in the background. Much Dramamine was consumed in the making of this video. Gee, 11.4 seconds per shot…and no shot longer than 20 seconds! Let’s match that with the chart above. Outed. The hair washing video was shot in an ISS mock-up airplane, flying the route seen in the chart over and over. I am sure they have methods I have not even dreamed of, and these are only the obvious cases where we can clearly tell that they are using certain methods. On the full ISS “tour” videos, these are no doubt created in a manner similar to a Hollywood film. Please do not think that this post means that I am convinced by any one specific type of space fakery theory. Certainly not Flat Earth, and I subscribe to no overarching explanation or conspiracy here. Space fakery is an area of great obfuscation, and all I can really say with certainty is that the ISS footage is not shot in weightless orbit. There is too much misdirection for me to get much farther than that with the logic…no doubt, that is by design. For the record, I lean towards a more simple explanation that space travel with our rudimentary Earth-based rocket technology would be completely cost prohibitive and suicidal. We would require another major leap forward in technology to make space-based technology like the ISS logical and cost effective. With rocket-based technology, the ISS would have never been possible to assemble, let alone maintain for dozens of years. The charade continues to this day for two basic reasons. First, NASA is too juicy of a revenue sucker off of the Federal budget for all kinds of other secretive programs. Second, it is a lie they has been deemed too embarrassing to admit to the public. They have deemed it preferable to keep up the charade. The moon landing and space travel is part of our mythology now, and they cannot take that away…especially if it is bringing them multi-billion dollar budgets each year! The lie continues around the world for similar reasons…a country like Russia is also too invested in the lie. For a new country like China, they figure that if the US and Russia are going to claim to be capable of this crap, they had better claim to be capable of it as well. It is a sort of arms race of fakery and stupidity. Then if China is going to do it, India wants to claim to be able to do it. Stupidity on top of hubris. That’s all, folks! PS: To the shills who will claim that nothing fell in the Kuipers video, see below. An object is removed, we hear it hit the floor, and Kuipers looks immediately down. Share this:FacebookTwitterRedditLinkedInLike this:Like Loading... Posted on September 17, 2020September 17, 2020 by FauxlexPosted in CGI, Control of the herd, Fabricated News, Fake events, False leaders, ISS, Photo fakery, Propaganda, Public hoaxes, Pursuit of truth, Science, Search for truth, SpaceTagged ISS, ISS Hoax, NASA, NASA Hoax, Space Fake. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Two important court casesNext Next post: Ear Worms 72 thoughts on “Irrefutable Scientific Proof ISS Footage is Fraudulent” Mark Tokarski says: September 17, 2020 at 12:43 am Please be more kind to older people. We never planned it this way. It just happened. LikeLike Reply Fauxlex says: September 17, 2020 at 12:44 am Hell, if I’m that old and they ask me to do a somersault, I tell them to kiss my ass! LikeLike Reply Pingback: Irrefutable Scientific Proof ISS Footage is Fraudulent — Piece of Mindful – Antisioniste se cancer pour l'humanité Maarten Rossaert says: September 17, 2020 at 7:00 am Great topic and great write-up! Fascinating to read the denial and spin control in the comments for this clip on YouTube. Question: Would you entertain the idea that a video like this is released “accidentally on purpose”? In other words, they know this is a complete give-away, and they put it out their to mess with our minds. Any photo or video I see anymore I ask myself the question, “How is it that I am seeing this?” For example, the post-Sandy Hook footage of Gene Rosen rehearsing his lines. The person filming that HAD to be in on the hoax. And so the release of that footage to the public was absolutely part of the bigger ploy. Ditto for Boston bombing wheelchair guy, etc. In other words, could it be that the goal here is not really to convince us there are ISS-nauts as it is to give us one more thing to argue about endlessly and so be distracted from the bigger picture? LikeLiked by 1 person Reply Fauxlex says: September 17, 2020 at 10:39 am I have definitely considered that they might just be trolling us. If your organization’s entire existence is based on such extensive levels of fakery, trolling is something that would come very naturally to you. The bastards might just be laughing on set and saying, “Hey Andre, do one where you pretend to drop something and it isn’t weightless!” With that said, it is hard to decide between an explanation of laziness, trolling, or an intentional reveal. They might just be lazy in relying upon the virtual reality technology programs to make everything look weightless, so the guy shooting the footage is just trying to get the astronaut speaking his lines and be done with it. They release it to Dutch foreign-language site, with far less scrutiny than a typical video. Laziness is hard to eliminate. This is why I mentioned that I find it very hard to ever draw any conclusions beyond that the footage is NOT shot in orbit. It is next to impossible to deduce their intentions, but you are absolutely right. They may just be trolling us here. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply ScottRC says: September 17, 2020 at 10:48 am Maarten, I’m the same way now about every piece of media I see, hear or read. My first questions are, How is this supposed to make me feel? What beliefs, values, attitudes and underlying assumptions do the creators of this material assume I must have in order to be manipulated, emotionally triggered and/or intellectually engaged by the material? And what am I supposed to take away from it? I’ve come to believe that obvious mistakes, inconsistencies or “screw”-ups like the one in this post are an essential element of propaganda. At a deep unconscious level, these “mistakes” force us to make a choice between trusting our own perceptions and seeing through the deception, or assuming there is a “logical” explanation and allowing authority figures to do our thinking for us. The latter choice rewards us with the safety of social reinforcement and acceptance. The first choice carries with it the threat of being ridiculed and ostracized as “conspiracy theorists.” These so-called mistakes are a key component of mind control. Fooling us over and over again would be a huge pain in the ass if we were actually in the habit of thinking for ourselves and trusting the evidence of our senses. This is why I mistrust conspiracy authors like MM who claim that these mistakes are evidence of sloppiness or division within the ranks, or are in some other way an indication that the PTB are slipping up. They are not. These glaring “glitches” in the Matrix are built into every hoax and psy-op and are perhaps the most important aspect of them, because of the way they erode our consciousness from within. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply Fauxlex says: September 17, 2020 at 10:54 am I get what you are saying, I really do. I just think that sloppiness is not so bad an explanation. If they were so unafraid and put out mistake videos intentionally, then why do they constantly erase the videos from YouTube? As a double bluff? We want you to see this, but we are going to delete it so that you think we don’t want you to see it? This is where I lose the thread on these kinds of things being intentional reveals. That said, I wholeheartedly agree with you about analyzing any content for how it is TRYING to make you feel. That is absolutely critical. I am just not sure that this video is anything other than a silly screw-up that they did not realize the significance of at the time, as he is speaking in Dutch and this may have been a video for a far lesser audience. LikeLike Reply ScottRC says: September 17, 2020 at 11:11 am “Why do they constantly erase these videos from a YouTube…” For me, the keyword in your question is “constantly.” With every hoax, including the current scamdemic, we are CONSTANTLY presented with evidence of deception that is CONSTANTLY memory-holed. (Think of the co-morbidity report on COVID deaths that the CDC posted and then took down.) We have all seen this evidence, it enters EVERYBODY’S mind, but when it is yanked down and the deceptions remain, we must make a choice. Do we dump that evidence into our own internal memory-holes, or do we go along with the false narrative and accept it as true? Even better, this presentation of and then yanking down of evidence serves to make “conspiracy theorists” seem even more quixotic and unhinged. “That video was just up yesterday! I swear I saw it! You’d believe me if you saw it too!” Our leaders want us to think they are stupid. Incompetent. Out of touch. Complacent. Screwing up. Why install a Bush or a Trump in the White House otherwise? So these apparent “screw-ups” serve that purpose as well, helping folks like you and me delude ourselves about the extent of their control. LikeLike Reply David says: September 22, 2020 at 4:05 pm once upon a time, there was a jeweler. A customer came into his shop and offered to sell him a diamond ring. On close inspection the jeweler said, “I cannot buy this ring; there is a big scratch on it.” So then i will sell it to you very cheap; make me an offer.” After he bought the ring, and the customer had left, the jeweler got out his tools and turned the scratch into a little flower. The next day, he sold it at a very high price. LikeLike Reply grahamsdiffusion says: September 17, 2020 at 7:31 am What’s the bigger picture? Only a tiny corner of the internet is arguing over or even doubting the veracity of the ISS. I doubt NASA or ESA is producing these films for our benefit. It’s free cinema, a free circus [on entry, although paid for by taxes] and almost everyone loves it, even we do from a different perspective. What scientist with half a brain will fall for the ISS nonsense? None, but you don’t bite the hand that feeds or shit in the nest. Having said that, I find it absurd to think these glitches passed the NASA censor. LikeLike Reply Fauxlex says: September 17, 2020 at 10:55 am Sadly, a lot of scientists. LikeLike Reply Isaac says: December 18, 2021 at 6:00 am Hi there, I just wanted to add, Nasa most likely produces those “errors” for several reasons including: 1- to calculate the percentage of population that don’t buy that bullshit, 2- to improve censorship with youtube, Google, etc 3- they want to polarize both sides, maybe to make the sheeple turn places like YouTube reddit etc into a trollfest, this way its impossible for the ppl with critical thinking to progress. I really like this website, I just want to also add that YouTube is deleting your referenced videos.. LikeLike Reply Mark Tokarski says: September 17, 2020 at 8:16 am I’ve seen this often, though I don’t pretend to understand. MM recently wrote about the coup d’etat in Guatemala in the last century, and how a mainstream media source is actually reporting honestly about it. I remember when that happened, the reporting and not the event, that it fell under a rubric of journalism called “NICBT,” or now it can be told. There’s no harm in telling the truth when hardly anyone is listening. This is similar, Sandy Hook and “pull it” after 911 too … it seems directed at just a few who are awakened, and rubs our face in it with their power over the minds of just about everyone alive. LikeLiked by 1 person Reply Fauxlex says: September 17, 2020 at 10:49 am I always attributed those cases to carelessness, or with a thing like Guatemala the idea that propaganda to cover your actions is only necessary if someone actually cares about your actions. Nobody in America cares about Guatemala. People would definitely care if NASA were inherently fraudulent though. If it were not an aggressively guarded secret, we would have more than these few little breadcrumbs that are constantly being erased from any public forum. They may not particularly care that we’re onto them, but I certainly don’t think they’re feeding us cases like this. They absolutely do not want this to become… truncated (47,221 more characters in archive)