Forty percent of American millennials (ages 20-36) believe the government should intervene when citizens say something that might be considered offensive to minorities, a Pew Research study reveals. It is not entirely clear what is meant by “intervene” and “minorities,” and the term “offensive” is b…
Thought and Speech Crimes: The Disturbing Case of Revisionist Ursula Haverbeck | Winter Watch MENU Writers ► Articles by Russ Winter Articles by Thomas Müller Articles by Torchy Blane Guest Posts News ► International News US News Politics Crime Culture Business ► Media Hidden History Videos Podcasts About ► Privacy Policy News Ticker [ January 3, 2023 ] Trump Suggests He May Run On Third-Party Ticket In 2024 Around the Web [ January 3, 2023 ] German youth in migrant-heavy neighborhoods once again turned Berlin and other German cities into war zones on New Year’s Day Around the Web [ January 3, 2023 ] Setting the Record Straight: White Europeans Were Captured and Traded as Slaves for Centuries Articles by Russ Winter [ January 2, 2023 ] Idaho quadruple ‘killer’s’ criminology professor reveals he was ‘a brilliant student’ and one of smartest she’s ever had and says she’s ‘shocked as sh*t’ he’s been arrested for murders Around the Web [ January 2, 2023 ] Excerpts from the Democrat-to-English dictionary: updated for 2023 Around the Web [ January 2, 2023 ] Alchemists and Early Modern-Era Organized Poisoning Articles by Russ Winter [ January 1, 2023 ] Law Will Install Kill Switches In All New Cars Around the Web [ January 1, 2023 ] Laid-Off Silicon Valley Workers Panic Sell Start-Up Shares As Valuations Crash Around the Web [ January 1, 2023 ] Bryan Kohberger Busted in the Idaho 4 Murders Case Articles by Russ Winter [ January 5, 2023 ] House Republicans Find Text and Email Evidence that Pelosi Staffers Secretly DECREASED Security at US Capitol for Jan 6 – While at Same Time Pelosi Was Organizing Film Crew that Day Around the Web [ January 5, 2023 ] Books Claims Biden Refuses to Speak Freely Around His Secret Service Agents Because They’re White Southerners Around the Web [ January 5, 2023 ] 22 Million Americans Still at Risk of Lead Poisoning from Water Pipes Articles by Russ Winter [ January 4, 2023 ] WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? Jan 6 Committee Sealed All Important VIDEOS and Documents for 50 Years – So They Can Continue to Lie About J-6 Protests and Fed Involvement Around the Web [ January 4, 2023 ] College of Psychologists of Ontario attempt to Strip Jordan Peterson of his License Around the Web [ January 4, 2023 ] The Casting Couch of Hollywood’s Jewish Phallocrats Articles by Thomas Müller Search for: Writers Articles by Russ Winter Articles by Thomas Müller Articles by Torchy Blane Guest Posts News International News US News Politics Crime Culture Business Media Hidden History Videos Podcasts About Privacy Policy Thought and Speech Crimes: The Disturbing Case of Revisionist Ursula Haverbeck May 8, 2018 Thomas Müller Articles by Thomas Müller, Crime, Culture, Hidden History, International News, Winter Watch Articles 13 Ursula Haverbeck in court in October 2017. PHOTO: Der Tagesspiegel/Reuters Forty percent of American millennials (ages 20-36) believe the government should intervene when citizens say something that might be considered offensive to minorities, a Pew Research study reveals. It is not entirely clear what is meant by “intervene” and “minorities,” and the term “offensive” is broadly defined. As usual in the world of Newspeak we go to our standby- the dictionary. Offensive: causing someone to feel resentful, upset, or annoyed. Wow, the eggshell world is here. Intuitively, the question likely pertains to the sort of nonsense we are seeing involving censorship and public persecution of those who espouse views that are deemed “politically incorrect.” Despite the threat of political correctness (PC) from millennials, Americans overall still put a high value on free speech, with only 28% in favor of government regulation of speech. Among respondents, 27 percent of Gen Xers (37-52), 24 percent of Baby Boomers (ages 53-71) and 12 percent of the Silent Generation (age 72 and older) believe government should control and limit offensive speech. The dwindling Greatest Generation universally defends free speech, but they are now over age 90. In Germany, a troubling 70% are in favor of limiting free speech. That country will jail those who engage even in revisionist history involving WWII, and even debate on the Holocaust is considered taboo. In fact, it is illegal in Germany to deny or even downplay the Holocaust. The term deny is curious given that no leading revisionist on the topic actually denies atrocities or actions against Jews and others. Understanding of the Case of Ursula Haverbeck 89 year old Ursula Haverbeck was supposed to report to prison to serve a two year sentence for “holocaust denial”. Instead she is on the run, presumably sheltered away someplace by supporters. The Jewish ‘International Auschwitz Committee’, apparently oblivious to the bad optics, is asking German police to use ‘high pressure’ to hunt down and imprison this elderly woman. Update: Ursula apparently went back to her home after five days on the run, and police hauled her to prison. Ursula Haverbeck was sentenced for violating section 220a [see below]. For a woman of her advanced age, this is the equivalent of a death sentence. The following video is the interview that got her into hot water. Watch it before it’s removed from the Internet. Apparently, “downplay” is double-speak for revisionism. Watch the interview closely, as if you were on the jury. Nowhere does Haverbeck deny that crimes or atrocities were committed against Jews (and others), nor does she refuse to accept that they were rounded up or persecuted. Rather, she speaks mostly about the nature, methods and the numbers, which is deemed “revisionism.” The following is an excerpt from the German law, and what a broad and sweeping law it is. In essence, it demands no one disturb the public peace, ruffle feathers or challenge a history that has been deemed set in stone or static. (3) Whoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or renders harmless an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the type indicated in Section 220a subsection (1), in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine. Please, watch Haverbeck for yourself. See if you can identify her so-called offensive words that “might disturb the public peace.” In fact, Haverbeck was remarkably well composed and was relatively careful in her word choice. Despite the news coverage on her imprisonment, I certainly didn’t hear her “approve of” atrocities or claim they didn’t happen. Do you hear her “rendering harmless” acts committed under the rule of National Socialism? She did go into the rarely discussed — but I think much-needed — topic of the mass murder (Hellstorm) of German civilians and POWs as the war wound down and after the defeat of Germany. Basically, she is “guilty” of processing things outside of the box and not functioning under prescribed terms. Her “revisionism” only involves researching and questioning the size and degree of atrocities against Jews and the aspects of the Hellstorm. She did suggest that truth or history on these topic has been “distorted.” She uses the term “Das Groste Problem” to define this distortion. This is problematic in her eyes because this historical distortion has been used as an agenda to kowtow Germany and promote Zionist power. I’m sorry, but I don’t see “The Great Problem” train of thought as a jailable crime. I don’t see being an aggressive revisionist as being a jailable crime either. Nor is hurting someone’s feelings a jailable offense. Any sensible observer would say that ALL history has been distorted to one degree or another and should be subjected to frequent revision, review and question. Nothing should be set in stone. Courageous Jewish historian Norman Finkelstein has addressed the issue of shaping history and ranking human suffering (uniqueness doctrine) to achieve questionable agendas as it relates to Palestine. This is also what Haverbeck challenged. To help set the facts straight on this case, I believe Haverbeck essentially adopted the work of the French historian Paul Rassinier and probably also French historian Robert Faurisson. The latter focused on the so-called confessions of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoess under severe torture. Since his death, some of his views (such as no gassing in camps within Germany) have quietly been accepted with little notice by the mainstream Holocaust historians. Haverbeck is not an original researcher but has picked up the mantel. Incidentally, Amazon just purged the works of these historians from their online marketplace. TNN has no intention of going into the thought police tarpit of discussion on Rassinier and Faurisson’s outlawed historical revisionism. We have no strong conviction one way or the other and, like most events, especially when the victors write the history, there are shades of grey. There is far too much false dichotomy on both sides of the issue. We do find the notion of a court approved version of events that one could lose their liberty over beyond Orwellian. The “judge” would not permit testimony from a revisionist historian in court. It is fundamental that there should be open discussion, even of controversial views, without threat of prosecution. But if the authorities are willing to make an example out of an 89-year-old woman, well, what more is there to say. Mind-Blowing Comments in Joseph Goebbels’ Diaries I don’t claim to have the answers. But something popped up while reading through the Goebbels Diaries that blew my mind. In the diary there is a reference to Hungary. And it looks like Goebbels the insider and one of Hitler’s closest confidants thinks something completely different is going on. According to the official narrative the deportation of the Hungarian Jews began on April 29, 1944 when a train load of Jews were sent to Birkenau. In ten short weeks 400,000 were alleged gassed there. Did Goebbels not get the word of such a major operation? Curious comments indeed. Some claim Goebbels was lying to avoid incrimination. But Goebbels bluntly said plenty in his diaries to incriminate himself, and had no intention of ever appearing as a defendant before a tribunal. Apr 18, 1944 (II.12.44) The Führer then explained to the Gauleiters the background of his campaign in Hungary, and how it was designed. He gave an amusing description of his talk with Horthy. He had to use strong-arm tactics because the old man was not comfortable with the necessary measures. The Führer left him in no doubt, that either it would be a fight to the death or that he had to submit. The Führer had so many forces to apply to this campaign that Horthy offered no serious resistance. In particular, the Führer expected contributions from Hungary of food, oil, manganese, and people. In particular, he wants the 700,000 Jews in Hungary involved in beneficial activities for our war effort. Apr 27, 1944 (II.12.199) 300,000 Hungarian Jews have been detained and imprisoned in the concentration camps. They should come, in large part, to Germany as a workforce. Himmler will take care of this; above all, they are to be used for our difficult war production programs. May 4, 1944 (II.12.232) Our plenipotentiary in Hungary, Veesenmayer, gives an excellent speech on the decisive Hungarian factors. …In particular, it’s to his credit that the Hungarian potential is now in large part requisitioned for our war efforts. Also, the Jewish Question is now being handled more energetically. I insist that the measures taken against the Jews in Hungary have a factual basis. It’s not enough that one only announces in the press what happens, but one must also explain it. In Budapest the Jews are starting to be gathered into ghettos. The ghettos are built in the vicinity of the armament factories, because air attacks are likely there. It is hoped thereby to avoid British-American attacks on Budapest, if at all possible. The notion that the vast majority of Jews sat around passively awaiting their fate is a myth. The Jewish Telegraph Agency has numerous stories of evacuations as the eastern front advanced. See: [Jewish News Archive, 7/8-1941; 45,000 Bukovina Jews Evacuated to Soviet Interior]and [Jewish News Archive 2/18/1942, Uzbekistan Becomes New Home for Hundreds of Thousands of Evacuated Jews] or fought back. Apparently Goebbels didn’t have any idea about the scale of any killing operations against Jews either. Apr 29, 1942 (II.4.201) ** The SD gave me a police report on conditions in the East. The danger of the Partisans continues to exist in unmitigated intensity in the occupied areas. The Partisans have, after all, caused us very great difficulties during the winter, and these difficulties have by no means ceased with the beginning of spring. Short shrift (kurzen Prozess) is made of the Jews in all eastern occupied areas. Tens of thousands must bite the dust, and the Fuhrer’s prophecy is fulfilled for them, that Jewry has to pay for inciting a new World War with the complete removal (Ausrottung) of their race.. Later, indeed these Jewish ghettos near armament factories were bombed by the Allies. One Hungarian Jew in the Yad Vashem interviews who was conscripted to work on the Carpathian fortifications stated that his grandparents and sister were killed in such a Budapest raid. We do find it deeply disturbing that Haverbeck is to be imprisoned at all. And what of those who simply defend free speech and the right of Haverbeck to conduct this interview without prosecution and jail time? Are they, too, going to be subjected via some contorted circular logic leading to derision, ridicule or even prosecution? Support for Ursula Haverbeck can be provided here. GabSaveEmailShareWhatsAppMorePrintLike this:Like Loading... Star Chamber JusticeSuppressed & Hidden HistorySuppression of Free Speech Previous article Next article Related Articles Around the Web Here’s where the ‘facts’ about me lie — Facebook bizarrely claims its ‘fact-checks’ are ‘opinion’ January 2, 2022 Winter Watch 2 Around the Web Google Sister Company Using SPLC Data to Develop Comment Moderation Engine May 12, 2019 Winter Watch 0 Around the Web ‘New Pages’ of Anne Frank Diary Prove that Her Father Wrote Most of the Book May 20, 2018 Winter Watch 1 13 Comments on Thought and Speech Crimes: The Disturbing Case of Revisionist Ursula Haverbeck Bill Kilgore September 3, 2017 at 11:41 am https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/394fb659748338b442c06300fab0d96a051e38ffe2131f3813157e4b8bbf2aba.jpg Loading... Reply Nicks87 March 10, 2021 at 9:26 pm WTF? They were asking for millions of dollars in aid money for things they had no proof of? No wonder people think the holocauscht was fake, they had been lying about it before it even happened! Loading... Reply Brabantian September 3, 2017 at 11:49 am The irony of a Jew who had his books burned (!) repeatedly over many years by post-war, modern Germany, after he dared to question the official Shoah / Holocaust narrative – A Jew who is now being gradually web-erased, ‘memory-holed’ after his death. German-speaking Jewish author Josef Ginsburg – pen name ‘Joseph G. Burg’, was born 1908 in Chernivtsi, Austria-Hungary (now Ukraine), & died 1990 in Munich, Germany, was a rabbi’s son who became a fervent Communist. Like most Jews before 1940, Ginsburg was anti-Zionist, but all his life he continued to believe that Zionism & Israel were disasters for Jews. During World War II, Germans sequestered Ginsburg in the open in Transnistria under great hardship. Freed by Soviet Union armies, Ginsburg joined advancing Soviet trooops as part of official Soviet teams entering into & inspecting Nazi camps in Poland such as Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek, Treblinka, & Sobibor, known today as the ‘death camps’. As Ginsburg visited Auschwitz in 1945 & spoke to hundreds of surviving inmates, anti-Nazi Jew Ginsburg “formed the opinion that there were no ‘extermination’ camps at all, that gas chambers had never existed & that there had been no plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe.” Ginsburg said he could find no gas chambers which were not de-lousing stations, nor witnesses who had seen any. Ginsburg said many other things too, such as that it was Jews themselves who pushed the idea of Jews wearing yellow stars of David in Nazi-occupied regions (‘wear it proudly’) Technically himself a ‘Holocaust survivor’, Ginsburg wrote books saying the ‘Holocaust’ was a fraud. It remains illegal in nearly half of Europe to support Ginsburg’s opinions. Josef Ginsburg also said with conviction, that Rothschild family members all sign secret iron-clad contracts to go along with many things they may personally despise, in order to keep their share of family fortune. Ginsburg’s ‘holohoax’ claim does have problems. Millions of religious non-Zionist European Jews seem to have disappeared – Did they all change so quickly to Zionistic views? But how Ginsburg was treated was shocking. West Germany’s government continually attacked Ginsburg, confiscating & burning 7 of Ginsburg’s 13 major books / writings from 1962-89, the West German regime ice-cold to the irony of burning a Jew’s books over a much longer period than Nazis themselves ever did. Ginsburg was attacked & beaten, apparently by other Jews, & Jews refused to bury him when he died. Ginsburg’s story is in process of being internet-scrubbed, not too far from being effectively ‘erased’ from English language web searches. Instead of countering Ginsburg’s views with facts or argument, or saying he was stupid, or crazy, or deluded by his Communism or his perhaps fanatic anti-Zionism, the response to this Jewish writer & WW2 survivor was to burn his books & near-erase him from media & now the internet. Yet his story is fascinating, at the very least, however ‘wrong’ Ginsburg may have been. A few items on Josef Ginsburg still show, one an article on Josef Ginsburg’s striking testimony at a Canadian ‘Holocaust denial’ trial of his friend Ernst Zündel … the Canadian crown prosecution refused to cross-examine him http://www.zundelsite.org/archive/harwood/dsmrd/dsmrd24burg.html An interview with the aged Josef Ginsburg (Joseph G Burg) which he gave in his final years http://www.faem.com/eric/2000/et004.htm Loading... Reply Brabantian September 4, 2017 at 8:46 pm The above became an article on Henry Makow’s anti-cabal site, with numerous additional quotes from Josef Ginsburg – Joseph G Burg himself: https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/09/Josef-Burg.html Here a photo of bearded Josef Ginsburg – Joseph G Burg (1908-90), from the 1980s when he travelled to Canada to testify in the trial of his fellow Holocaust revisionist Ernst Zündel (1939-2017), who died last month on 6 August, Ernest Zündel on the left in the photo, Josef Ginsburg – Joseph G Burg on the right https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fe1298228517db8fdd0a8b5c4818ecd98dcbb58a20d6f3f6a4b93a35f49f1e46.jpg Loading... Reply Douteux55 September 3, 2017 at 5:26 pm The newspaper clip displayed in the aid link is from 2015 so is Ursula currently serving time or was there a later decision? As it is nearly the end of 2017 is she coming out soon? Great info from Brabantian. I guess it’s nearly impossible to get any of Ginsburg’s works anymore. Very disturbing and demoralizing. As a teacher I’m finding it increasingly difficult to teach anything anymore because of the lies and the efficacy of the brainwashing in play since time immemorial. Will we ever wake up? I understand a similar law is awaiting legislation here in the US. Why can’t people see this for what it is? I blame the christian churches- all denominations. Loading... Reply Russ Winter September 3, 2017 at 6:17 pm There is a new black out, but she just lost her appeal, and while the star chamber aka court was at it, it increased her term to 2 years without the possibilty of parole. My understanding is that she was remov… truncated (11,766 more characters in archive)