Education Industry Education Education is important because it brings out the best in children who are going to be the adults of the next generation. At all events, that is the way that it should be and it is the reason why subversives with agendas have infiltrated the industry. There was a term being used by post Marxists a few decades ago; entryism which means worming one's way into positions of influence and power in order to take over. It was part of the Long March Through The Institutions & the Marxist Takeover Of The Ruling Classes. They do not use them in public anymore because they have done it. They are imposing Cultural Marxism. The objective is Cultural Genocide They have succeeded. Here are some comments on the results. One answer is use Home Schooling. Then you know what they being fed unlike the disaster that is Eton Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed. Joseph Stalin Jews Took Over Education Circa 1960 QUOTE Conspicuously missing from the list of Jewish allies are lower- and middle-class Whites. These are the groups that were most vilified by the New York Intellectuals and the Frankfurt School, and they have suffered the most by the multicultural revolution. These people are being pushed out economically and politically. They are the enraged participants in the Tea Party movement that is so visible right now and they voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. They can’t move to gated communities or send their children to all-White private schools. Their unions have been destroyed and their jobs either shipped overseas or performed by recent immigrants, legal and illegal. Their fortunes will continue to decline as millions more non-Whites crowd our shores. Those among them who wish to become professors will perforce have to turn their backs on the political and economic interests their own people. The result of this revolution is the American university as we see it now. Conservatives need not apply. And heterosexual White males should be prepared to exhibit effusive demonstrations of guilt and sympathy with their oppressed co-workers—and expect to be passed over for high-profile administrative positions in favor of the many aggrieved ethnic and sexual minorities who now dominate the university. UNQUOTE Is Professor MacDonald overstating the case? If only it were true but, as always he quotes sources; he gives us the evidence. He was part of the industry for decades so he knows what he is talking about from rather unpleasant direct experience. Undoing The Dis-Education Of MillennialsThe somewhat graceless title leads to something much better. Professor MacLeod tells university students that they have been sadly misled and how to up their game. Archbishop Cranmer states the problem. The professor states the answers. Universities As A Bastion Of Free Speech?Not any more, they aren't. Archbishop Cranmer has a view and assumes that you know your Trollope. E. G. West ex Wiki Edwin George West (27 February 1922 - 6 October 2001) was an economist and economic historian at Carleton University [ in Canada ] interested in the relationship between the state and the education sector. He applied public choice theory to state education and "he had a profound influence on both academic scholarship and education policy in Britain and abroad [1] The E.G. West Centre at Newcastle University is named in his honor. His book, Education and the State, published in 1965, continues to be highly influential. He researched how the state gradually became more and more involved in the education system of England and other countries. He examined the effect it had on the quality of education, concluding that its influence was ultimately negative. West was visiting professor at the University of California at Berkeley (1974), Emory University (1985-1988), the University of Western Australia (1995) and the University of Kentucky (1995).[2] And Vindictiveness for AllThe education industry is run by Moral Cretins who are dumbing down, keeping children ignorant. They gave up teaching grammar years ago. Now they don't even teach spelling in government schools in Thamesmead, a part of London where drug addicts, blacks etc. are warehoused - at cost of millions. Grammar SchoolsThey were designed to teach grammar. Now they don't teach spelling. An ex-teacher explains the Marxist takeover; saying also that the Tories are no better. Education Is A Racket, A Ponzi SchemeThe price goes up. The quality goes down. Why leave a university with a bit of paper owing thousands when you could have gotten a worthwhile job four years ago? Modern Education And The Destruction Of Culture The education industry is a Propaganda tool being used by our self-appointed Invisible Enemy as part of their Culture War against us. See Nature Versus Nurture on the point. Reading This is about how to understand what you read as well as what you should be familiar with. Ultimately it is counter-Propaganda or even Deconstruction. Academic strife: the American University in the slough of despondUniversities are about bringing on a new generation of the intellectually gifted; future leaders, researchers etc. aren't they? If only. They are a maelstrom of malice and political agendas. Tom Sharpe would have had fun with them. His satire was too gentle or English universities were nicer. Education 1895 In 1895 they were serious about education. It was intended to help people help themselves. The syllabus was impressive. Could you have passed this exam, the one taken by 14 years old children in rural America? Education and Politics Education is very political. Here is more on the point. Education In Los Angeles Read this and shudder for the future of England. Los Angeles is different - for the moment but London is being made into another place like it. Importing blacks, yellows, browns, Third World undesirables, free loaders generally has that effect. That is why it being done to us. Then see what will happen in the schools. Education In Nigeria Education is Nigeria is different. In Lagos market they sell biltong, dried meat and babies disappear. Cause and effect? That is what the police say; they should know how things worked. Education Should Aim At Destroying Free Will Says Bertrand Russell QUOTE "Education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished." (Page 50 - The Intended Result of Education).UNQUOTEThe education racket does sort out the clever, the cunning. It is about Brainwashing, socialization, Propagandizing & Social Engineering just like the Main Steam Media. Enstupidation - Fred Explains Education You might feel that Fred over-states his case. In some ways he does but not by much. There is a solid core of truth in what he tells us. It makes a good case for Home Schooling. Head Start Fails Thus Proving That IQ MattersHead Start was an American government operation that was intended to improve education for the less successful, those presumed to be victims of less opportunity. It proved that IQ is the issue; in Nature Versus Nurture, the former matters most. You cannot make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. See e.g. a source that Professor MacDonald mentions - Is Head Start Working for American Students? [ Hint: No but it costs lotsa money & keeps people off the dole. - Editor ] Home Schooling Is not a problem; it is an answer and a very good one. It gets your children out of the grip of the propaganda machine. Intelligence Measuring intelligence makes sense. So does using it. Find it, then bring it on sounds good to me. But politics get in the way. Psychologists measured it then decided they did not like the answers they got so now they claim it cannot be measured. This is because blacks rate low. Keith Windschuttle And Education Doctor Windschuttle tells us that history education in Australia is corrupt and a pack of lies. They were telling us that we oppressed Abos out of sheer nastiness. He named perpetrators They didn't sue for libel. In other words they are guilty as Hell. London School of Economics Was set up by communist subversives of the Fabian Society, as a working tool to destroy England Marketing Homosexuality Yes, Homosexuality is being marketed by the Media [ the BBC has a very personal interest here ] and the education industry. It is one front in a war of subversion; destroying our moral standards and our culture. Antonio Gramsci, the chief theoretician of the Italian communist party would have loved it. Multiculturalism's War on EducationQUOTEBack to school nowadays means back to classrooms, lessons and textbooks permeated by multiculturalism and its championing of "diversity." Many parents and teachers regard multiculturalism as an indispensable educational supplement, a salutary influence that "enriches" the curriculum. But is it?....... Leaf through a school textbook and you'll find that there is a definite pattern behind multiculturalism's reshaping of the curriculum. What multiculturalists seek is not the goal they advertise, but something else entirely......... What these textbooks reveal is a concerted effort to portray the most backward, impoverished and murderous cultures as advanced, prosperous and life-enhancing. Multiculturalism's goal is not to teach about other cultures, but to promote -- by means of distortions and half-truths -- the notion that non-Western cultures are as good as, if not better than, Western culture.UNQUOTEWe are being lied to big time. The education industry is just as bad as the media and quite possibly more dangerous. The Myth of American Meritocracy Getting into the top universities in America is highly important for success. The process has been corrupted by the pressure & Jews. Parents Right; Math Experts WrongUNQUOTE"Parents Right; Maths Experts Wrong. curriculum mistake made by the so-called education experts who demanded that schools ..."UNQUOTE The Lunatic Fringe is out there and the kiss of death for anything they control. Politics Undermining Learning Scholars Warn University Of California An uncompromising headline. Is it justified? Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself. Rigging the Admissions Game Admission at Harvard Keeping Jews out was the point and a failure. Now Jews keep honest men out. The University of Chicago is a Moral CesspoolQUOTEBy FRANCIS A. BOYLEProfessor of Law, University of Illinois School of LawIt is now a matter of public record that immediately after the terrible tragedy of September 11, 2001, U.S. Secretary of War Donald Rumsfeld and his pro-Israeli "Neoconservative" Deputy Paul Wolfowitz began to plot, plan, scheme and conspire to wage a war of aggression against Iraq by manipulating the tragic events of September 11th in order to provide a pretext for doing so. Of course Iraq had nothing at all to do with September 11th or supporting Al-Qaeda . But that made no difference to Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and the numerous other pro-Israeli Neo-cons in the Bush Jr. administration. These pro-Israeli Neo-cons had been schooled in the Machiavellian/Nietzschean theories of Professor Leo Strauss, who taught political philosophy at the University of Chicago in their Department of Political Science........................ Chicago routinely trained me and numerous other students to become ruthless and unprincipled Machiavellians............... For their own different reasons, both groups also worked hand-in-hand to support Israel's genocidal Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, an internationally acknowledged war criminal. Strange bedfellows indeed.UNQUOTEUniversities are very influential; training young minds at an important stage of development. That is why Chicago was infiltrated by subversives with very ugly agendas and morals to match. If you think that Oxford and Cambridge are different you should have another look. The BBC is where their graduates go in order to do the maximum damage. BTW was it before or after that Rumsfeld and the Jew, Wolfowitz started plotting? Didn't they know before that it was going to happen? Why Do British Charities Want To Shut Down Private Schools In Africa? QUOTE Why would anyone who claims to care about the world’s poorest children try to shut down their schools? It’s strange and sad, but several British charities, in cahoots with some British unions, are making a concerted effort to close down hundreds of schools in Africa. They are doing this because they dislike private education, seeming not to care that this will destroy the life chances of thousands of desperate children, forcing them, at best, into state schools where the teachers are often absent, drunk or incapable. The campaign involves not only an alphabet soup of left-leaning charities from ActionAid to Amnesty International but also Unison and the National Union of Teachers (NUT). Their attacks are directed at Bridge International Academies, a private company backed by, among others, Bill Gates and the British government. If Bridge set up bad schools that failed African pupils, the campaign would make sense. But it doesn’t. Bridge schools are good and improving education. Founded by an American husband and wife about a decade ago, Bridge started with a single pilot project in a Nairobi slum and has grown to 600 schools across Kenya, three other African countries and India. Simply built and painted green, the schools are now a familiar sight in the poorest areas. Bridge makes no secret of its aim to one day make a profit by charging fees, albeit very low, but it will reach that stage only when it has grown its student population from the current 100,000 to half a million. The Bridge dream is to one day educate 10 million children. I visited a Bridge school in the slums of Gilgil in Kenya’s Rift Valley. Gilgil is a mess of rusty tin shacks, open sewers and stinking rubbish. The parents I met were all desperately poor, but equally desperate that their children should be better off. I spoke to a man called Charles Maina, whose daughter had graduated from the school. He just about survives by selling potatoes in the local markets, yet despite their circumstances, he and his wife had spurned the local government primary school because it did not offer a good enough education for their daughter, Anne. Instead, they often went hungry to send her to the Bridge school where she scored high marks in her examinations, went on to a top secondary school and now dreams of becoming a doctor. Asha Said, another Bridge parent, is a hairdresser in a slum salon. ‘The teachers here are better than in a government school,’ she told me. Inside the Bridge classrooms I visited, teachers conducted lessons on a Kindle-like electronic device using the national curriculum. The teaching is entirely scripted and transmitted from a central office in Nairobi. The students appeared engaged, the teachers attentive, and at least twice a day Bridge’s central offices monitor the performances of every student, classroom and teacher. All Kenyans I spoke to about Bridge told me the schools enjoy an excellent reputation. Poor parents are keen to send their children to one if they can afford the fees — just over £60 a year. In the countries where it has set up business, nobody disputes that Bridge’s exam results are consistently better than those of children from state-run schools. Yet a caucus of charities and unions — many of them UK-funded — is determined to shut these schools down. In a recent letter to Bridge’s investors, it urged them to ‘exit in the shortest possible time from their investments [and make] no further financing commitments’. It accused Bridge of a ‘lack of transparency, poor labour conditions and non-respect of the rule of law’. David Archer, a senior official at Action Aid, told me Bridge was a ‘clever American con trick’ motivated by the founders’ ‘ego’. Sylvain Aubry, another campaigner, condemned Bridge as purely commercial in its aims. He described the schools as illegal and posing a ‘threat to the fabric of society’. Bridge’s adversaries gave me a litany of their crimes across continents — human rights abuses, health and safety violations — but across 600 schools, very few had led to a conviction or even a fine and none for serious offences. Most of the allegations were preposterous. One was a claim that Bridge violates the ‘sovereignty’ of African countries like Uganda. Uganda’s education minister, Janet Museveni, the wife of the strongman Yoweri Museveni, who has ruled his benighted country for 32 years, has ordered all 63 Bridge schools in the country closed. Her government alleges Bridge schools teach pornography and ‘convey the gospel of homosexuality’. Bridge dismisses these claims. Bridge’s opponents claim that pupils in Uganda can simply walk across the street and enrol in government schools. ‘There is no evidence that Bridge has improved access to education,’ Archer told me. ‘If they were closed it would make no difference,’ said Aubry. Yet recently crowds of Bridge families took to Uganda’s streets, asking the government where they should send their children when the schools close, because in Uganda some 700,000 children are believed to be out of school. In a report on UK aid for overseas education compiled last year by Britain’s parliamentary International Development Committee, Uganda’s legendary homophobia got no mention. Instead, the committee, headed by Labour MP Stephen Twigg, described the UK’s support for Bridge schools as ‘controversial’, while endorsing the expansion of aid to state schools overseas. Archer says Bridge aims to lure talented children away from state schools in order to boost their exam scores. He also told me that although Bridge children did not come from the very poorest families, they still faced sacrifices to cover Bridge fees. From what I have seen, this is true — but the fact that a poor African family values its children’s education above anything else is surely admirable. Education International is a global coalition of unions of which the NUT is a member. It is a leading attacker of Bridge, and its core policy is to oppose the privatisation of schooling. These organisations stick unstintingly to the line that privatisation of education in Africa is evil because it saps the will of governments to make their state school systems function properly. On Twitter in February this year, Winnie Byanyima, the global executive director of Oxfam (and a Ugandan), praised Museveni's government for closing down Bridge schools. ‘Well done,’ she gloated, claiming the company’s schools ‘take advantage of poor people by offering low-quality education leading kids nowhere’. In private, Byanyima apparently believes the opposite. In October 2015 she wrote an email, which I have seen, in which she conceded that ‘Bridge and other low-cost private schools are … delivering education where public schools are — or are perceived to be — low quality’. This, she accepted, was due to ‘unacceptable failures of public policy, the result of political and financial neglect of public education’. While Byanyima celebrates the closure of private schools for the poor in her homeland, she had no problem with sending her own son, Anselm, to the elite US Choate Rosemary Hall in Connecticut. Ugandan media photographed Anselm puffing on a Toro Grande-sized cigar at his school graduation last year. One box of his Montecristos would cover the annual fees for two poor Ugandan children to attend a Bridge school. With cruel hypocrisy, Byanyima and our own education activists argue that the way forward is to … truncated (130,372 more characters in archive)