TextSearch

beast of babylon against the son of hercules, the (1963)

Specializing in old, bad and obscure horror, thriller and science fiction movies lovingly reviewed.

· archived 5/18/2026, 12:44:51 AMscreenshotcached html
beast of babylon against the son of hercules, the (1963) menu homesite newsfeature moviehorror/sci-fi/fantasyanthologies etceteracosmic catgiallohammer filmsjunglelandkrimimexican churrosnoirroger corman moviesserialssilents pleasesword and sandalthe detectivesthrill metokyo driftas seen on tva for andromedaandromeda breakthroughbeastscity beneath the seamanimalmoonbase 3pathfinders in spacepathfinders to marspathfinders to venusprimevalquarksecret beneath the seaquatermass and the pitquatermass experimentquatermass iispace rangersfawlty towersunaired/unsoldunaired/unsold pilotsthe veillists, essays & cool stuffgary's listsspotlightsblock bustersquotesthe cat's meowwhere are you?who am i?joe's cornerlinksauthor login You are here:   Homesword and sandalbeast of babylon against the son of hercules, the (1963) sword and sandal beast of babylon against the son of hercules, the (1963) review with movie 1960's The evil Balthazar (Piero Lulli) killed the king of Babylon and has taken over the throne.  With his high-priestess, Ura (Moira Orfei), by his side, the false king has suppressed the people and offers virgins to their god as sacrifice. Returning to Babylon, after being in exile, and under the protection of Cyrus (Mario Petri), the King of Persia, is Nippur (Gordon Scott).  Nippur is the son of the king of Babylon and the true heir to the throne.  Nippur is apprised of the situation in Babylon by his friend Namar (Andrea Scotti).  On the way they save a slave girl named Tamira (Genevieve Grad), who was destined to be a sacrifice, from the Babylonian troops. When Nippur gets to Babylon, he interrupts the sacrifice of the latest batch of virgins.  When he asks for his father, Balthazar tells him he is on a mission and will be back in a month.  Nippur doesn’t believe this and accuses Balthazar of having his father in prison.  A tour of the prison shows that he is not there, but Nippur believes that he is either hidden somewhere or has been murdered.  Nippur is recognized by the head of the guards as the man who saved Tamira.  He tells Ura, who thinks she may be able to use this information to her advantage.  With all the treachery and torture going on, Nippur decides to align himself with the slaves and the oppressed people of Babylon.  He is attacked and wounded by Balthazar’s guards.  He is found by Cyrus’ men and nursed back to health.  With Cyrus on his side, Nippur vows to return to Babylon and free his people.  Instead, he ends up chained in the dungeon while the sacrifices continue. “The Beast of Babylon Against the Son of Hercules” AKA “L'eroe di Babilonia” AKA “Hero of Babylon” was released in 1963 and was directed by Siro Marcellini.  It is an Italian French sword and sandal film.  It is also one of the movies that were sold to America and compiled into the “Sons of Hercules” syndication package.  The copy of the film I have, which may be the British version, is one of the original films that was dubbed, not as a “Sons of Hercules” film but as “Hero of Babylon”. This is your standard Peplum style movie with Gordon Scott doing a reasonable job as the hero of the story.  Piero Lulli as the sadistic Balthazar is quite convincing.  When you complain that the screams of the people you are torturing is interrupting the pleasure of your meal, then you are one sick dude.  The other actors are standard sword and sandal movie types, and the plot too is typical of sword and sandal films, but Balthazar, and his cold stare, adds a queasy touch to the movie. The movie is noted as being one of the few to show Gordon Scott with chest hair.  An interesting tidbit, but the fact that Reeves did his own stunts is more impressive.  Some of the sets used were from “The Fury of Achilles” (1961). Reportedly, the movie is a fictionalized depiction of the Fall of Babylon.  In 539 BCE, Cyrus the Great invaded Babylonia.  I’m not sure I want to give the plot all that much credit. But…  Even the various historical records, and I use the term “historical records” loosely, don’t agree as to what happened, therefore, much artistic freedom is to be expected.  The record of the event comes from The Book of Isaiah and The Book of Daniel, from the Bible, as well as the Cyrus Cylinder and the Chronicle of Nabonidus, which were both written after the event.  All in all, it is propaganda from the seventh century BCE. Previous article: atlas in the land of the cyclops (1961) Prev Next article: beastmaster (1982) Next No comments Leave your comment In reply to Some User Cancel Name * Email address * Comment Text * To open the popup, press Shift+EnterTo open the popup, press Shift+Enterp0 words Toggle Editor Save reviews by tags zombies 91 werewolf 53 vampire 112 reviews with trailer 36 review with movie 2538 propaganda 63 mummy 38 frankenstein 42 dracula 37 dinosaurs 134 2020's 10 2010's 111 2000's 144 1990's 105 1980's 220 1970's 343 1960's 581 1950's 399 1940's 299 1930's 260 1920's 76 1910's 20 1900's 5 1890's 1 latest reviews noise god told me to (1976) frankenstein unbound (1990) dr heckyl and mr hype (1980) beast of the yellow night (1971) winterbeast (1992) mutilations (1986) dracula (spanish) (1931) demon hunter (1965) bloody new year (1987) blood sabbath (1972) blood legacy (1971) blair witch project, the (1999) beyond dream's door (1989) behemoth (2011) Search SearchType 2 or more characters for results. Search