Research Suggests That A Woman’s Body Incorporates DNA From The Semen Of Her Casual Sex Partners | Manosphere.at
Research Suggests That A Woman’s Body Incorporates DNA From The Semen Of Her Casual Sex Partners | Manosphere.at Manosphere.at Search Primary Menu Skip to content Home Forum Search for: Uncategorized Research Suggests That A Woman’s Body Incorporates DNA From The Semen Of Her Casual Sex Partners September 7, 2015 Roosh Valizadeh 463 Comments Compelling new scientific research has shown that female insects and mammals are able to absorb foreign DNA throughout the cells of their bodies. In human beings, this phenomenon has been conclusively shown to occur in women during pregnancy where genetic material from her growing fetus becomes fused within areas of her brain, affecting her chances of developing Alzheimer’s disease. The evidence now shows that female animals can incorporate sperm DNA from her prior sex partners. This foreign DNA winds up in future children after the woman successfully reproduces with a completely different male. In the human world, this means that the children a man has with a promiscuous woman could possess genes from previous sexual partners he has never seen or met. There are existing sociological studies that show a marriage is far more likely to fail when a woman had more than two prior sexual partners (1, 2, 3, 4), but now renewed support for the once-questionable field of telegony is showing that there are also genetic reasons not to start a family with a promiscuous woman: children you have with her may have their gene pool polluted by her random affairs and one-night stands. Telegony is an idea first proposed by Aristotle that claims offspring can inherit genes from the mother’s previous sexual partners. This idea was not scientifically supported until evidence piled up of microchimerism, the phenomenon of foreign DNA becoming incorporated into the genome of an individual. This was first noted to happen in the case of blood transfusions. If you have received blood while in a state of trauma, your donor’s DNA can become incorporated into your genome. Surprisingly little research has been done on microchimerism since then, but all signs point to this being a widespread and common genetic phenomenon throughout the animal kingdom. A groundbreaking study on flies last year showed the process of females incorporating DNA from previous male partners and then exhibiting that male DNA into future spawn they had with completely different males. Scientists at the University of New South Wales discovered that, for fruit flies at least, the size of the young was determined by the size of the first male the mother mated with, rather than the second male that sired the offspring. […] “Our new findings take this to a whole new level – showing a male can also transmit some of his acquired features to offspring sired by other males,” she says. “But we don’t know yet whether this applies to other species.” […] Dr Stuart Wigby of the Department of Zoology at Oxford University added: “The principle of telegony is theoretically possible for pretty much any internally fertilising animal, but these hasn’t historically been much evidence for it. Scientists involved in the study are making the guess that sperm DNA gets absorbed into female eggs without fertilizing them: The researchers suggested that the effect is due to molecules in the seminal fluid of the first mate being absorbed by the female’s immature eggs, and then influencing the growth of offspring of a subsequent mate. It was already observed that the human female body acts as a sponge for foreign DNA placed within it: It is possible that Mc [microchimerism] in the brain is able to differentiate into various mature phenotypes or undergoes fusion with pre-existing cells and acquires a new phenotype, as suggested by murine and human studies in which bone marrow-derived cells circulated to the brain and generated neuronal cells by differentiation, or fused with pre-existing neurons. […] Although the relationship between brain Mc and health versus disease requires further study, our findings suggest that Mc of fetal origin could impact maternal health and potentially be of evolutionary significance. The above study has two seismic implications. The first is that a woman can absorb enough DNA during her lifetime that it changes her phenotype (i.e. her appearance and overall health state). There could be some truth to the phrase “slut face” in which highly promiscuous women suffer a change to their appearance because of all the variable sperm from different males that have been deposited inside them. The second implication stems from the fact that it’s scientifically conclusive that single mothers have DNA of their bastard children residing permanently within their bodies. Any man who reproduces with a single mom will have a child that contains DNA from the bastard spawn, which of course includes DNA from the absentee father. This means that men can be genetically cuckolded without being traditionally cuckolded, and that having a baby with a single mom is essentially giving the father of her first child a bonus prize in the game of evolution. Microchimerism has also been noted in dogs, where older siblings pass on their DNA to younger siblings, suggesting that first-borns possess the highest genetic purity, a suspicion perhaps suspected by the royalty of old. Not only that, but the mother dogs incorporated Y-chromosome material from her male children. The mother dog essentially becomes more masculine by having sons. The researchers found cells with Y-chromosomes in the mother after these births, meaning the mother had male cells present in her female body. The researchers also found genetically similar male cells in the mother’s female puppies from a later litter. Those puppies were newborn and had never been pregnant, strongly suggesting that they acquired the cells that were left behind by their older brothers while in the womb. If a woman absorbs Y-chromosome genes from male sperm via casual sex, this would easily explain why women with high notch counts exhibit more masculine traits, something that any international playboy can anecdotally confirm. The promiscuous girl becomes more masculine because various masculine genes are being inserted into her genome and affecting her phenotype. Some of the older ideas on telegony, dating over a century, now don’t seem so left field: French biologist and philosopher Felix Le Dantec in his work “Individual Evolution, Heredity and Neo-Darwinists” (1899) mentions several facts that demonstrate telegony. But the evidence was quite pseudo-scientific even for that epoch. The author gave two examples with animals and one for humans. Le Dantec wrote that some farmer told him that once his swine copulated with a boar and their pigs absolutely resembled the father in color. But when the same swine copulated with another boar some pigs of the second farrow still resembled the color of the male pig the swine had copulated first. He also wrote about Lord Morton who first interbred a mare and a zebra and got a hybrid of horse and zebra. Next time he interbred the same mare with a horse. As a result of the second copulation the lord still got a colt that had lines resembling those of a zebra. Microchimerism is on the leading edge of genetic research that has lately included epigenetics, which is the switching on and off of certain genes due to environmental cues. Epigenetics has raised questions against evolutionary theory because it shows genetic adaption can occur within individual organisms without the need for natural selection. New research is revealing how little we actually know about how the human genome works, suggesting a more complex picture than we’ve imagined. Sociological research was the first to show that marrying women with a robust sexual history increased the likelihood of a failed marriage. Now genetic research adds more evidence to show that such women will birth children that—to a degree we don’t yet understand—are not entirely of the father’s. Because this new field of research is politically incorrect in painting strongly negative consequences for women leading a “strong and independent” promiscuous lifestyle, we are unlikely to see liberal universities approve much in the way of further research in this area. For thousands of years, a woman’s purity was cherished above all else when it came to creating a family. Now the scientific community is confirming the validity of that practice. Until the science is settled, men who insist on reproducing with a promiscuous woman should at least demand to interview her previous sexual partners so he can become familiar with the men whose genes may be passed on to his future children. Read Next: The Deregulation Of The Sexual Marketplace Post navigation Previous PostOnly White Countries Are Expected To Let In Hordes Of Illegal MigrantsNext PostTransgender Activists Report Cross Dressing Charity Fun Run To Police As Hate Crime 463 thoughts on “Research Suggests That A Woman’s Body Incorporates DNA From The Semen Of Her Casual Sex Partners” farotw says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am Telegony isn’t new, it’s debunked junk science popular in Islamic press. You’re discrediting this website and its readership by putting this up. Reply Robert What? says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am And your basis for saying this is … ? Reply A Street in Texas says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am Telegony was dismissed as nonsense back in the early 1900s IIRC. However, the research cited here (and elsewhere) suggests that the concept may not be entirely bogus. Whether it occurs in other species is currently an unknown. Basically, he read something that he didn’t like. Reply Robert What? says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am I ain’t saying ’tis true and I ain’t saying ’tisn’t. But since genetic science has changed enormously since the early 1900s (for better and worse), it’s worth a fresh look. Reply Remo says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am So now that there is a new scientific study confirming that *yes* there are genetic factors that are passed down that confirm telegony we are going to dismiss it because it was debunked as junk science 20-30-40 years ago back when we did not have the means to properly test the theory? If science is self correcting then you are the stick in the mud that demands that the Earth is flat and isn’t the center of the Universe because you do not like the results Reply Rick Leonardi says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am Here you go dumabss: Professor Leonard A. Herzenberg of Stanford University in 1979 for the first time proved that fetal DNA can pass into the mother during pregnancies.[19] Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in 2012[20] has shown that it is not uncommon for fetal DNA to get through the blood–brain barrier and into the brain of the mother.[21]Leiden UniversityMedical Center in the same year published a result which indicates fetal DNA from previous pregnancies can enter the bodies of younger siblings.[22] In 2013, scientists around the globe demonstrated in animals, the significant effect of incorporating foreign DNA.[23][24] Apart from the above-mentioned, one Chinese scientist has proposed possible molecular mechanisms that may account for the reported cases of telegony.[25][26] The proposed mechanisms include the penetration of spermatozoainto the somatic tissues of the female genital tract, the incorporation of the DNA released by spermatozoa into maternal somatic cells, the presence of fetal DNA in maternal blood, incorporation of exogenous DNA into somatic cells, presence of fetal cells and fetal DNA in maternal blood and sperm RNA-mediated non-Mendelian inheritance ofepigenetic changes. Reply No one important says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am Studies like this are quickly buried or discredited because of how inconvenient it would be for women’s rights if proven conclusive. Right now, there are things that our society absolutely CAN NOT accept, despite all their claims for enlightment. It was like this in the past, and it will be like this in the future. Many well established scientific truths today were ridiculed and denied during centuries before they were accepted. Reply Crowdkontrol says: September 8, 2015 at 3:00 am Correct; however, the enlightenment Era started very roughly 300 years ago fyi to help put things in perspective. I prefer to be humble before nature as we do not understand much yet in the grand scheme. This is probably some important process in nature or else it wouldn’t have evolved then again this is the first time I’ve heard of it. Personally as long as she hasn’t slept with people I know, is LOYAL, makes it past the qualifying stage and is pleasant be around I could care less. The real behind the scenes issue is people resent being lied to. Reply Sunspot says: September 9, 2015 at 3:00 am It’s more that if you procreate with someone who is not a virgin, you’re being cuckolded to some degree. Reply Carrie ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says: September 9, 2015 at 3:00 am Well, women today have more opportunities to procreate with virgins than ever before. Males, however, have the least amount of such options today. Reply Crowdkontrol says: September 9, 2015 at 3:00 am You sir need therapy. You got some self esteem issues. Take some mescaline in a safe environment and think about that. Doctors orders. Reply Sunspot says: September 10, 2015 at 3:00 am Cuck’s orders? Reply TonySandos says: September 17, 2015 at 3:00 am don’t kill yourself if you ever find out you’re a “cuck offspring” yourself, which is very likely if this is your new threshold for cuckoldry. You do suffer from low self esteem and terminally egoistic thinking. On the other hand you could be autistic so it’s not your fault you think in only black and white terms, I’m sorry. Honestly try to understand the doctor’s thoughts behind this, or you may end up being very unhappy in a world of dwindling virgins and the book “sperm wars” in existence Reply Sunspot says: September 17, 2015 at 3:00 am I’m sorry you blew your chance. The socialists talked a lot of people into giving up a lot of things in the 90’s and 00’s. I’m very lucky in that my parents came of age in the time before the sluttification of females and cuckization of males, and with further luck, my offspring will come of age after the sluttification and cuckization has passed.. Reply Sunspot says: September 18, 2015 at 3:00 am Immaterial to the discussion. The male body does not appear to incorporate the DNA of its mates. Likely this is the core reason behind the whole general tendency of females not to care if men sleep around, but non-cuck men get murderous if the woman sleeps around. Reply TonySandos says: September 18, 2015 at 3:00 am This reeks of omega tendencies Reply TonySandos says: September 18, 2015 at 3:00 am It’s an odd assertion to claim some non-specified motive on my part. I’m sorry you’ve failed to noticed, but the socialists kind of won the battle in small part. The questionable purity of the genome of the general populous is already irreversibly tainted is the point of reality. British scientists have already made their latest attempt at playing god with creating the first three parent child. None of us consented to this, but it’s beyond our control. If you recoil like this at the modern turmoil, I don’t see how you’re capable of looking back at the darker chapters of history, especially in conquest and warfare. Reply Sunspot says: September 18, 2015 at 3:00 am Just curious, do you follow human r/k theory at all? If true, it will turn everything on its head at some point. Reply TonySandos says: September 18, 2015 at 3:00 am As will an asteriod hit the earth again at some point. Reply Carrie ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am If you believe that females have a general tendency to not care if men sleep around, I seriously hope you do not possess or drive an automobile, because you are beyond insane and could cause mega-damage to entire swaths of sidewalks. And it is pretty misandrist of you to claim that men (of any sort) “get murderous” over anything. Men actually have consciences, you know, and self-control, and integrity, despite what boards like this one keep trying to tell us about men. *Also, this author’s interpretations of these scientific findings are pretty far out there, pretty daft. I mean it’s fun to have a wild imagination but there should be limits. Reply Carrie ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am Mescaline? Or Datura? Reply Sunspot says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am Not only do I possess a car, but it’s even *paid off*. How hot is that? My wife is pretty happy that I’m murderous over her, though. She knows that if the power ever goes out, I’ll be murderous on behalf of her and the kids. Who you gonna turn to, cupcake? Reply Sunspot says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am R/K is the asteroid that will hit leftists only. Reply Carrie ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am Well, my husband’s a retired military sniper who teaches hand-to-hand combat now. Maybe he’d know someone we could turn to. Of course whenever tshtf, I plan to leave the door ajar to take out the first few shits myself. The dogs are gonna need meat what with the stores being looted. But the wife of a self-proclaimed murderous piece of shit who reads rapey pickup artistry websites will probably turn to a nice divorce attorney before I’d need any help when the power goes out, Limburger dumplin’. {EDIT: I like how you think having one paid-off car is anything other than the minimum of what is expected of any adult! Our 15 1/2 y.o. paid-off his own car and he’s not even old enough to drive it on the streets!} Reply Sunspot says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am So then you understand that the point of men is to be murderous when murderous is called for. We have a purpose, tied into our sexual identity, and it all wraps up into a nice bow, see? Reply Carrie ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am No. That is NOT the point of men. That is NOT “your purpose”. The very belief that that is the point of men is why so many of you end up in prison, on the streets, and in morgues, not to mention in divorce courts with limited custody. I heard the term “toxic masculinity” once but I couldn’t conjure up any fitting examples. But you sure as hell did that trick better than any long-winded article could. I know this is a site that gives no fuck whatsoever about the rights of men beyond the misguided “right” to trick drunkards into sleeping with you against their will and still not pressing charges, but there ARE a good number of people who actually DO care about the rights of men, and the welfare of men, and abolishing your toxic definitions of manhood should be a big, fat number one on the list. Men are infinitely better than you give them credit for. Reply Sunspot says: September 20, 2015 at 3:00 am Complement accepted! I am extraordinarily toxic to evil and destructive people. Reply Carrie ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says: September 21, 2015 at 3:00 am There you go calling men “evil and destructive people” again, all the while poor, misguided men who think as you think keep ending up homeless, murdered, or suicided. Sheesh, you’re a man-hater. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c0e1e4f672fb16d6ebd7162364387fca7bea6842639c92bd3e953e9283f30df3.png Reply Sunspot says: September 21, 2015 at 3:00 am It’s good that you have married into a military-type guy who knows what he’s doing, as you have questionable judgment and reading comprehension. Reply TonySandos says: September 21, 2015 at 3:00 am Lol no. When you find out that extremely country girl you searched years for in the sole purpose of marrying a virgin, don’t murder her when you find out she fucked someone before you. Reply Sunspot says: September 21, 2015 at 3:00 am I’m far too discriminating to not detect the stink of other men on a girl. I haven’t been neutered yet! Reply TonySandos says: September 22, 2015 at 3:00 am A com… truncated (170,635 more characters in archive)