Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

I have hesitated to release my "free energy" magnetic designs because out of nearly 7 billion people there are too many insane thugs out there. I just wanted to be safe, no risks, build them one day without anyone knowing that they're being built, and then hit the world with the extreme detailed documentation and videos using the guaranteed distribution method I've outlined at my forum, but that day will probably never arrive since I'm far too involved in diode array stuff. So perhaps one day soon, someone will build it, and with some hard work it will eventually work.

Anyhow, this may sound like theoretical stuff, but I've spent too much time on the magnetic theory to know better. Numerical analysis mathematics using conventional physics clearly shows an energy gain. There is just no getting around it! My magnetic theory, based on conventional physics mathematics, clearly shows where the energy comes from (ambient thermal energy), and how the device captures such energy. The only difficulty is in overcoming losses from friction, etc.


Here's Free Energy design #1 -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?topic=164.0


Hopefully in a few weeks I'll create the animation for designs #2 and #3 and release them.


PL

overunity wimhurst for the win !

If I understand it correctly. You use the window of opportunity you have with lagging materials to force a changing flux through a coil, before said coil can react to the source of this change by impeding its motion?

The magnetic viscosity is not for the coil, but to provide a window of opportunity to *increase* the magnetic field within the core in such a manner that would require ambient thermal energy more work to break the magnetic bonds. I know that probably sounds like a zip compressed sentence, and it is because it's too difficult to explain, even on a single sheet of paper using math because it requires mathematical numerical analysis to go over the details.

If you would see it per infinitesimal time unit. Then at one unit the flux is A,for instance, and at the next unit the flux is 100*A. But as a result this also would give a high EMF peak for 1 unit of time. Isn't this too little power to be useful? Unless you increase the frequency then that peak can become a steady voltage. Btw I have not used the fact that your black rods were powered, because I don't understand why in the way I understand it.

Actually the amount of power these designs should produce is considerable. A shoebox size device should be able to power a typical house. As for how much energy, it depends on the design you're talking about-- #1 or #2. In #1, the typical gained energy per event is equal to input energy times 1.2 to 1.6.  That does not mean #1 is only 120% efficient. No, because if 80% of the energy is returned that went into magnetizing the core during 1/2 cycle (inductance), then the efficiency is 100% + 20% * (100% / [100% - 80%] ) =2600%. If you get back 90% of the energy from the inductors, then it comes to 300% efficient.  Using 1.6 gain instead of 1.2 and we get 700% efficiency.

PL

Regarding Free Energy design #1, here's a quick outline of how it captures the ambient energy, but I'm pretty much waving my hands here. To make it easier, I would have to show the numerical analysis in person, and go over everything, but here goes nothing.

Magnetize a short ferrite rod using a copper coil. The rod length is the same as its diameter. The effective permeability is ~ 3.9 ish.  The magnetic field within the material is say 1000 Gauss. Consider three of such ferrite rods that are separated from each other. Then quickly move all three rods right next to each other in magnetic attraction so they form one long rod. The net magnetic field within the center rod just immediately increased by 1.74 times before the rod has time to react.

Now here's the secret. Just because the magnetic field increased does not mean more ferromagnetic atoms are going to begin aligning. If you remove the voltage source from the coils then ambient thermal energy will begin to demagnetizing the material ***even though the magnetic field is 1.74 times greater than when it was magnetized with the coil.***  That means ambient thermal energy *must* work harder to demagnetize the cores.

This is very simple to see and understand in FEMM.

PL

Then quickly move all three rods right next to each other in magnetic attraction so they form one long rod. The net magnetic field within the center rod just immediately increased by 1.74 times ***before the rod has time to react***.

My above quote is a key area. If the three rods were moved at an ordinary rate, and of course you'll need to short the coils to passively retain the magnetic energy in the cores, then the ferromagnetic atoms will decrease at a rate relative to how close the other rods approach such that the end resulting field is the same, 1.0, instead of 1.74.  The shorted coils consume no power, so lets say they are superconducting to simply the example.

The point is, as the three rods approach each other, the net permeability increases, and the ferrite rods want to maintain the same magnetic field.

If the net magnetic field from each separated rod is 1000 gauss (due to the coil), then there is X joules of energy released in the rod. Some of such energy goes into the form of heat (kinetic), some in the lattice and other areas (potential). When the field is removed, it requires ambient thermal energy to break the ferromagnetic bonds, which is why the magnetic material cools down. This effect is known as MCE (Magnetocaloric effect). So, when the core magnetizes to 1000 gauss, there's X joules of energy added to the core from potential magnetic energy, but due to magnetic viscosity the core is suddenly 1000 * 1.74 = 1740 gauss, which requires 1.74 * X joules of ambient thermal energy to break the ferromagnetic atomic bonds. Per cycle there is a net loss of ambient thermal energy.

This is so clear cut and a guarantee!  I'm telling you, anyone who builds such a machine, and if they can overcome the losses, and move the parts fast enough to overcome the magnetic viscosity, then it's a *guaranteed* "free energy" machine!


PL

the spinning wheels of the wimhurst, would also be perfect for moving a magnet towards, through, and away from 2 other magnets.


each Pleiadian ship is more or less a giant wimhurst machine.
the giant mushroom head interior of their ships, even help propagate certain frequencies of sound.

to make their wimhurst-ship into an OVERUNITY wimhurst ship.

each Pleiadian ship is more or less a giant wimhurst machine.
the giant mushroom head interior of their ships, even help propagate certain frequencies of sound.

I don't doubt you brother!  Such technology is beyond me. I just want to take the guaranteed path. Present mathematics using conventional physics clearly shines the path. Ambient thermal energy is plentiful, with over one billion joules per cubic meter of common matter, all sustained by the Sun.

PL

Paul,
Is your idea along the lines of Kunel's patent?

http://rechercheblog.de/wp-content/downloads/KunelPatent.pdf